Evac is a newly created Autobot character specially for the Transformers The Ride.
The Ride is set to open this coming Saturday, 3rd December 2011 at Universal Studios Singapore at Sentosa .

Seibertron, Ultimate Transformers Resource!
I doubt it, since this guy is a "new recruit" and all.alldarker wrote:I still don't understand why they are using a pretty recent character name that's already sort of established within the Transformers franchise, for this 'new character' in the TF ride. Or will this character actually be the same as 'helicopter' Evac?
LadyBug wrote:If you guys learned anything from the Ride, Evac has been around in the Transformers universe for a while. He was just never used before in anything major.
http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Evac_(Cybertron)
alldarker wrote:I still don't understand why they are using a pretty recent character name that's already sort of established within the Transformers franchise, for this 'new character' in the TF ride. Or will this character actually be the same as 'helicopter' Evac?
alldarker wrote:LadyBug wrote:If you guys learned anything from the Ride, Evac has been around in the Transformers universe for a while. He was just never used before in anything major.
http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Evac_(Cybertron)
We all know who the CURRENT character Evac is, Captain Obvious... read my question again:alldarker wrote:I still don't understand why they are using a pretty recent character name that's already sort of established within the Transformers franchise, for this 'new character' in the TF ride. Or will this character actually be the same as 'helicopter' Evac?
BTW: your non-working link should actually be: Evac (disambiguation)?
zodconvoy wrote:
I just wish this ride was coming to the States. I'm not a fan of roller coasters but I'd have to ride this one on principal. But if they do a figure of it, does that make it Swerves partner? Cuz that's what I will be using it as.
starwarrior1227 wrote:I do wish he was given a dif. name than the heli we already got but i won't mind since i can always just rename him myself.
that ride will be AWESOME!
it isn't comin state side?!
NNNOOOO!!
well lucky u all who can ride it can then!
LadyBug wrote:zodconvoy wrote:
I just wish this ride was coming to the States. I'm not a fan of roller coasters but I'd have to ride this one on principal. But if they do a figure of it, does that make it Swerves partner? Cuz that's what I will be using it as.
This ride isn't a roller coaster... why does everyone think it is?
zodconvoy wrote:alldarker wrote:LadyBug wrote:If you guys learned anything from the Ride, Evac has been around in the Transformers universe for a while. He was just never used before in anything major.
http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Evac_(Cybertron)
We all know who the CURRENT character Evac is, Captain Obvious... read my question again:alldarker wrote:I still don't understand why they are using a pretty recent character name that's already sort of established within the Transformers franchise, for this 'new character' in the TF ride. Or will this character actually be the same as 'helicopter' Evac?
BTW: your non-working link should actually be: Evac (disambiguation)?
Or you both could've done it like this. The link can say anything you want. Pull up a quote on this post to see how.
I just wish this ride was coming to the States. I'm not a fan of roller coasters but I'd have to ride this one on principal. But if they do a figure of it, does that make it Swerves partner? Cuz that's what I will be using it as.
zodconvoy wrote:alldarker wrote:LadyBug wrote:If you guys learned anything from the Ride, Evac has been around in the Transformers universe for a while. He was just never used before in anything major.
http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Evac_(Cybertron)
We all know who the CURRENT character Evac is, Captain Obvious... read my question again:alldarker wrote:I still don't understand why they are using a pretty recent character name that's already sort of established within the Transformers franchise, for this 'new character' in the TF ride. Or will this character actually be the same as 'helicopter' Evac?
BTW: your non-working link should actually be: Evac (disambiguation)?
Or you both could've done it like this. The link can say anything you want. Pull up a quote on this post to see how.