Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:55 pm

Look at this, he has some points, but I still don't want to belive it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3Oh8Msw4SM

Remember the vid from that guy who analised the trailer?
He mentoioned something of ACE 2004, could it be that taht referes to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MER-B

News Credits: 103 · by **Cyber Bishop** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:17 pm

Dead Metal wrote:Look at this, he has some points, but I still don't want to belive it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3Oh8Msw4SM

Don't believe it.
The Godzilla license is owned by Columbia Tristar not Paramount..
Again, the Godzilla license is on hold right now...

People just keep grasping at straws.
Why would they make a high profile monster movie by utilizing the "persons perspective" with the camcorder?

by **WarHorse** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:55 pm

Sonray wrote:Whetever this "monster" is it has to be mechanical. Those things it fires into the air like missiles make me think this. If it was a monster then it could only i dunno, shoot out a fireball like Godzilla or a stupid beam of light like Gamara. These however get launched into the air, and then after a certain altitude they have a secondary firing stage, like a large firework, where they explode and split up into more smaller projectiles, which then as we see impact the buildings in the trailer.

Not to mention the fact that when they are flying through the air, you can hear the sound of some sort of propulsion system, like a rocket or as i already said a type of missile.

Its mechanical in at least some form.

I'm not saying that it's mechanical or not but those things that flew into the air didn't at look at all like missiles to me. They just looked like shrapnel from the large explosion. The sound they make wasn't a propulsion system, it was the sound any fire makes in the wind. Just my opinion though.

by **Sonray** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:55 pm

WarHorse wrote:
Sonray wrote:Whetever this "monster" is it has to be mechanical. Those things it fires into the air like missiles make me think this. If it was a monster then it could only i dunno, shoot out a fireball like Godzilla or a stupid beam of light like Gamara. These however get launched into the air, and then after a certain altitude they have a secondary firing stage, like a large firework, where they explode and split up into more smaller projectiles, which then as we see impact the buildings in the trailer.

Not to mention the fact that when they are flying through the air, you can hear the sound of some sort of propulsion system, like a rocket or as i already said a type of missile.

Its mechanical in at least some form.

I'm not saying that it's mechanical or not but those things that flew into the air didn't at look at all like missiles to me. They just looked like shrapnel from the large explosion. The sound they make wasn't a propulsion system, it was the sound any fire makes in the wind. Just my opinion though.

If it was just debris then how comes they all explode at the same time in mid air and seperate?

I think everyone is looking into this waaaay too much and besides, wasnt there a transformers movie out sometime soon or something?

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:43 pm

here are some interesting facts i found. especially this pic some of you might know, some of you dont. also these videos have interesting evidence.

this video below has really interesting theory's. this is a must see. look at the guys shirt and your gonna be like WTF?!? isnt that the guys name thats posting the cloverfield evidence videos? real interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWCuw-2g-RA

this video does also. really weird but it proves a point
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTpYGJzqcUU

check at 00:58 for the hidden sound the trailer has, can you guess?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmFxQnMe48I 00"58

Try and look at it in christianity.... The Week of Prayer celebrates 100 years from 01-18-1908 - 01-18-2008. And look up bible passeges Matthew 12:36 "But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken."
pic 1 12:01AM 1 min past twelve..opp end of clock 12:36AM (time on second pic) Pic 3 12:48AM, opposite end of clock (30mins later) You guessed it 1:18AM hmm next pic 1-18-08 1:18AM ?!?!?!?

News Credits: 34 · by **Supreme Convoy** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:48 pm

Mr.RobotoAutoMan wrote:

Personally I think that "face" is somebody's back or rumpled clothes.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I think the handheld camera perspective of this film is a gimmick to downplay the trailer I dont think the film is gonna be entirely produced this way,I think its a smoke screen that JJ Abrams is using to gather interest for the film,but thats my opinion.

I like the first person POV. Even though it's used in Blair Witch, I like that perspective for the documentary look.

In anycase, I love the hype and seeing all the theories out there.

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:54 pm

its the pic with the 2 girls face close to each other. probably its the ugly parasite jj was talking about lol.

News Credits: 34 · by **Supreme Convoy** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:58 pm

Mr.RobotoAutoMan wrote:its the pic with the 2 girls face close to each other. probably its the ugly parasite jj was talking about lol.

Yeah, I know that. But why would they be facing away from "the monster"?

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:00 pm

Supreme Convoy wrote:
Mr.RobotoAutoMan wrote:its the pic with the 2 girls face close to each other. probably its the ugly parasite jj was talking about lol.

Yeah, I know that. But why would they be facing away from "the monster"?

i have no clue? but why is it in there in the 1st place? are they messing with us? cause i feel like iam wasting time just tryng to figure this out. why doesnt he just tell us.

by **Sonray** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:08 pm

Dont bother trying to figure it out, you wont be able to. Just wait for more info as its released. You wont be able to figure it out unless THEY want us to. Personally i find it being a Power Rangers remake hilerious, and frightening.

News Credits: 3 · by **Barricade** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:10 pm

i like the power rangers theory that would be freaking awesome

News Credits: 3 · by **Barricade** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:11 pm

what is the importance of slusho???

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:30 pm

Barricade wrote:what is the importance of slusho???

its from japan and then it cuts to the japanese food. see something interesting. probably a japanese remake of giant monsters.

News Credits: 3 · by **Barricade** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:14 pm

that pic at the top of the page kinda looks like streek from gremlins....

News Credits: 3 · by **Barricade** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:16 pm

Supreme Convoy wrote:
Mr.RobotoAutoMan wrote:its the pic with the 2 girls face close to each other. probably its the ugly parasite jj was talking about lol.

Yeah, I know that. But why would they be facing away from "the monster"?

maybe hideing or running away from it...

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:11 pm

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:33 pm

Mr.RobotoAutoMan wrote:

Yes, that is an explosion. You win a gold star!

*

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:52 pm

lol i know its an explosion you can makes lots of faces with it. i found one that looks like donkey kong.
SCREW ALL THESE CLUES!!! iam just gonna stick with my "armageddon end of the world theory biblical"

News Credits: 49 · by **Senor Hugo** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:20 am

So, we all agree it's not Voltron now?

You know, I was looking around, and the movie is called The Parasite 'internally'.

Now, Arthur Conin Doyle wrote a novel entitled "The Parasite"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Parasite

This novel has to deal with the Occult and psychic powers. So, while I doubt it has anything to do with the film. There is always that possibility where they took the name from the book, and changed everything else about it.

The "face" that was shown, thats just hair. We're seeing a face due to a little tidbit known as "Matrixing" which is were you see objects where there are none. Like how you see a face in the clouds, or the tree, or in a photo of hair.

by **Mr.RobotoAutoMan** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:56 am

Senor Hugo wrote:So, we all agree it's not Voltron now?

You know, I was looking around, and the movie is called The Parasite 'internally'.

Now, Arthur Conin Doyle wrote a novel entitled "The Parasite"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Parasite

This novel has to deal with the Occult and psychic powers. So, while I doubt it has anything to do with the film. There is always that possibility where they took the name from the book, and changed everything else about it.

The "face" that was shown, thats just hair. We're seeing a face due to a little tidbit known as "Matrixing" which is were you see objects where there are none. Like how you see a face in the clouds, or the tree, or in a photo of hair.

maybe that guy named rob in the trailer is the austin guy in the book and he seems nervous in the trailer. is it because its that girl playing tricks on him. maybe who knows.

woah the book was written in 1894. then they coulve changed its setting on modern day. probably thats it. the movie is based on this book. lets spill the beans and tell ppl lol.

by **Astrotrain** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:10 am

10 bucks says its a blob remake...

News Credits: 6 · by **Dr. Caelus** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:38 am

Astrotrain wrote:10 bucks says its a blob remake...

You know, I was just thinking last week, "isn't it odd that noone has remade The Blob?"

That movie terrified me as a child.

I doubt that's it though, I don't remember the blob causing lots of explosions or throwing statues around.

News Credits: 103 · by **Cyber Bishop** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:49 am

Caelus wrote:
Astrotrain wrote:10 bucks says its a blob remake...

You know, I was just thinking last week, "isn't it odd that noone has remade The Blob?"

That movie terrified me as a child.

I doubt that's it though, I don't remember the blob causing lots of explosions or throwing statues around.

The last Blob remake was in 1988

http://imdb.com/title/tt0094761/

News Credits: 26 · by **Wheeljack35** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:47 pm

Oh smack CB I love that sig

OBTW that 1988 remake of the Blob sucked

by **Duo Prime** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:34 pm

There is a random theory that this is the Rampage movie. Apparently, the IMDB Rampage site was available for viewing before, but now, you can only see it with IMDB pro(whatever the hell that is). Supposedly, it was due out in 08', and the details of it were also kept extemely secret. The Slusho connection is one of the guys in the trailer at the party has on a Slusho T-shirt. There is a website that explains some things about the whole Slusho thing. It's a drink that some company made from some ingredient they found at the bottom of the ocean, frozen in ice, and it seems to do strange things to people. If i recall correctly, the people in Rampage drank some sort of soda and accidentally became those monsters.

here's the link to the Slusho thing.
http://www.slusho.jp/

There is also a theory that this movie is about some religious thing, somthing to do with revelations or somthing. This states that there are three monsters, Behemoth:the land monster, Leviathan: the sea monster that breaths fire, and Ziz: the monster of the sky. What this theory states is that, the first roar is accompanied by an earthquake(Behemoth), the second is the fireballs with the roar(Leviathan), and the third is the head of the statue O.L. being flung from the sky(Ziz). There is a bit more to it with the number 3 all over the place.

Both theories sound pretty cool, but, personally, i like the Rampage one the best, but who the hell knows, besides that Abrahms dude?
Personally