Seibertron.com - The Ultimate Transformers Fansite
Moderators: Counterpunch, Cyber Bishop, Supreme Convoy, robofreak
by daimchoc » Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:06 pm
by xyl360 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:09 pm
daimchoc wrote:Technically, Springer only used his cybertronian mode.
by rpetras » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:40 am
RodimalToyota wrote:daimchoc wrote:Why are people looking for Assaulter to have a G1 look when it's obviously using a Cybertronian mode?
Because people have a affliction of liking old, outdated designs, and want them to be repeated every two years.
by Mekatron » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:26 pm
by NTESHFT » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:30 pm
by Mkall » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:35 pm
daimchoc wrote:
by xyl360 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:56 pm
Mkall wrote:daimchoc wrote:
All right, who's the orange guy? He looks kinda neat,
by RK_Striker_JK_5 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:24 am
by daimchoc » Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:33 am
headsortails wrote:Glad I got him on preorder....
Still don't get why Steelcore hasn't made it to e-tail stores yet.
by RodimalToyota » Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:00 am
rpetras wrote:RodimalToyota wrote:daimchoc wrote:Why are people looking for Assaulter to have a G1 look when it's obviously using a Cybertronian mode?
Because people have a affliction of liking old, outdated designs, and want them to be repeated every two years.
1986 to 2012 does not equal 2 years.
by RK_Striker_JK_5 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:06 pm
by RodimalToyota » Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:17 pm
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:So this just leaves Sandstorm and Blitzwing for G1 triple-changers who don't have some sort of G1 representation. And no, I do not count that Scout-class redeco or TF: Animated Blitzwing.
by xyl360 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:52 pm
RodimalToyota wrote:rpetras wrote:RodimalToyota wrote:daimchoc wrote:Why are people looking for Assaulter to have a G1 look when it's obviously using a Cybertronian mode?
Because people have a affliction of liking old, outdated designs, and want them to be repeated every two years.
1986 to 2012 does not equal 2 years.
I meant "G1 inspired", not just Broadside, who honestly was one of the worst G1 toys. either way.
by Sodan-1 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:18 pm
by Mekatron » Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:42 pm
xyl360 wrote:RodimalToyota wrote:rpetras wrote:RodimalToyota wrote:daimchoc wrote:Why are people looking for Assaulter to have a G1 look when it's obviously using a Cybertronian mode?
Because people have a affliction of liking old, outdated designs, and want them to be repeated every two years.
1986 to 2012 does not equal 2 years.
I meant "G1 inspired", not just Broadside, who honestly was one of the worst G1 toys. either way.
Yeah, me too. I wanted G1 inspired (more so than this), which was all I was complaining about. What we got instead would be comparable to WfC/FoC Optimus Prime. He's certainly still Optimus Prime, just as this is still (in a way at least) a version of Broadside. But if I'm looking for a Prime that transforms into a truck even remotely similar to the G1 version, I won't settle for the WfC or FoC version of Prime, I want MP-10 or Classics or something along that line. That's the only reason FP's creation didn't strike the right nerve with me. It's nothing against them at all, and as I said before, it looks like a really cool figure, it's just not quite what I was looking for.
by xyl360 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:47 pm
Mekatron wrote:xyl360 wrote:RodimalToyota wrote:rpetras wrote:RodimalToyota wrote:daimchoc wrote:Why are people looking for Assaulter to have a G1 look when it's obviously using a Cybertronian mode?
Because people have a affliction of liking old, outdated designs, and want them to be repeated every two years.
1986 to 2012 does not equal 2 years.
I meant "G1 inspired", not just Broadside, who honestly was one of the worst G1 toys. either way.
Yeah, me too. I wanted G1 inspired (more so than this), which was all I was complaining about. What we got instead would be comparable to WfC/FoC Optimus Prime. He's certainly still Optimus Prime, just as this is still (in a way at least) a version of Broadside. But if I'm looking for a Prime that transforms into a truck even remotely similar to the G1 version, I won't settle for the WfC or FoC version of Prime, I want MP-10 or Classics or something along that line. That's the only reason FP's creation didn't strike the right nerve with me. It's nothing against them at all, and as I said before, it looks like a really cool figure, it's just not quite what I was looking for.
You guys DO realize that FP are kinda... attempting to branch-out & do their own thing with their latest figures, right? I realize most of their figures homage TF characters, but FP has definitely got their own style & look going on. They are not making Masterpiece or Classics figures for Hasbro...
by craggy » Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:22 pm
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:... Scrounge?
by RK_Striker_JK_5 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:18 pm
RodimalToyota wrote:RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:So this just leaves Sandstorm and Blitzwing for G1 triple-changers who don't have some sort of G1 representation. And no, I do not count that Scout-class redeco or TF: Animated Blitzwing.
I liked the classics, but imagine a properly done Astro-train.
Blitzwing is a must, I wonder why iGear hasn't copied the Custom MP
one on eBay.
by Mkall » Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:49 pm
by daimchoc » Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:34 am
Mkall wrote:For those complaining it doesn't look like a proper carrier:
found on /toy/
by Gauntlet101010 » Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:31 am
by Agamemnon » Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:39 am
by Stormrider » Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:54 pm
Mkall wrote:For those complaining it doesn't look like a proper carrier:
found on /toy/
Return to Unofficial Transformers 3rd Party and Knock Offs Toys
Counterpunch, Cyber Bishop, Supreme Convoy, robofreak
Registered users: ausbot, Banjo-Tron, Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], ishigoto, Lord Raze, MSN NewsBlogs, MSNbot Media, Shadowstream, Susha, Syko, Va'al, warmech95, xyl360
