Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
No, collectively the don't either. They show nothing. As I said earlier, this could as easily be a way of better understanding other life forms as it could them having sex.Tramp wrote:Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:But since there is nothing that even remotely referrs to the fact that they do either, it is not "obvious" that they can reproduce sexually. Your multiple sources refer to nothing but "other means" & "family relations" that could just as easily be for the purpose of better understanding other cultures as it could be "proof" of sexual relations among TFs. Like I said, your argument has no concrete evidence...as they do not specifically mention that they sexually reproduce nor do they show conception, birth, or growth among TFs in any way. They have shown creation, construction, protoforms, rebuilding(Pax-Prime, Ariel-Elita)....but there is simply no evidence to back up your claim.Tramp wrote:Damolisher, I have not just been using one line form one source. I have used multiple sources from all over TF lore. It is not "obvious" that they are incapable of sexual reproduction. Just because they are mechanical, does not make them incapable.
Individually, no, they don't. collectively they do. As I said, research is not about looking for a single source with all the answers, it is about piecing together evidence from many sources. And just because they only showed one method of creation, does not limit it to only that method, especially when we have sources which state that there are other methods available. and, yesm they do show growth among transFormers, we see small children in Victory children of adult transformers. Do you honestly think that they would remain chibis forever?
question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
Excuse me? How do you get two life forms of the same speices (in this case, Transformers), a male and a female, engaged in a romantic relationship and engaged in courtship being for the purpose of "understanding other cultures"? That makes absolutely no sense! If this were after they had been to Earth, that might make some modicum of sense, but not relationships that have been going on for millions of years before they ever encounterd humans, and between individualts who have never been to Earth. They do not need to specifically mention sexual activity among TransFormers to make it possible. You don't need a magic bullet. All you need to do is piece the evidence together.Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:No, collectively the don't either. They show nothing. As I said earlier, this could as easily be a way of better understanding other life forms as it could them having sex.Tramp wrote:Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:But since there is nothing that even remotely referrs to the fact that they do either, it is not "obvious" that they can reproduce sexually. Your multiple sources refer to nothing but "other means" & "family relations" that could just as easily be for the purpose of better understanding other cultures as it could be "proof" of sexual relations among TFs. Like I said, your argument has no concrete evidence...as they do not specifically mention that they sexually reproduce nor do they show conception, birth, or growth among TFs in any way. They have shown creation, construction, protoforms, rebuilding(Pax-Prime, Ariel-Elita)....but there is simply no evidence to back up your claim.Tramp wrote:Damolisher, I have not just been using one line form one source. I have used multiple sources from all over TF lore. It is not "obvious" that they are incapable of sexual reproduction. Just because they are mechanical, does not make them incapable.
Individually, no, they don't. collectively they do. As I said, research is not about looking for a single source with all the answers, it is about piecing together evidence from many sources. And just because they only showed one method of creation, does not limit it to only that method, especially when we have sources which state that there are other methods available. and, yesm they do show growth among transFormers, we see small children in Victory children of adult transformers. Do you honestly think that they would remain chibis forever?
& your best argument about the lack of growth is ,"Don't you think they wouldn't stay chibis forever"???" This alone shows your lack of evidence & how your argument is faltering & nothing more than trying to fit round pegs into square holes.
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
Tramp wrote:Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
No, Cyberplex, I don't think that is what Thunder Thruster means by his first question. Based upon his proevious posts, he agrees with the seven criteria of life being a requirement. His follow-up questions also point to that. Correct me if I am wrong here Thunder Thruster.
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
Well, going back to the Star Trek sci-fi stuff, Data engaged in several activities that served him no other purpose other than to better understand other life forms...including having a girl friend...it's not so much a stretch to think that given their ability of space travels & being known to interact with several different life forms, some of which that might not be human but still go through similar mating rituals....it's possible it could have been an older customs they picked up from some long-forgotten friendly relations they were trying to better understand.Tramp wrote:Excuse me? How do you get two life forms of the same speices (in this case, Transformers), a male and a female, engaged in a romantic relationship and engaged in courtship being for the purpose of "understanding other cultures"? That makes absolutely no sense! If this were after they had been to Earth, that might make some modicum of sense, but not relationships that have been going on for millions of years before they ever encounterd humans, and between individualts who have never been to Earth. They do not need to specifically mention sexual activity among TransFormers to make it possible. You don't need a magic bullet. All you need to do is piece the evidence together.
I was referring to your argument about TFs having sex on the whole with the peg/hole comment. But the fact that your best argument for them not growing is "why shouldn't they?" still shows that your filling in gaps in you argument with nothing other than "I want it to fit together this way, so it can't be anything else."Secondly, no asking if you expect the chibis—the child TransFormers—to remain small children forever is not putting square pegs into round holes, nor is it a sign of a weak argument or lack of evidence. The children of the DinoForce look like chibi versions of their parents. They are child TransFormers. This was specifically stated. They are smaller, cuter versions of theit parents' forms with childish proportions, just like a baby wolf or baby human is a smaller, cuter version of their parents, with "child-like" proportions.
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
That's actually all I have been trying to get across is that wether they do or not is purely preference.....sorry if it sounded like I was arguing with you. I was just trying to clearify. I never said that it wasn't possible that they could be doing the wild toaster dance, just that they never say anything about it. Personally, I find it rather hillarious to display my Energon Arcee gawking at E-scorponok's tail...tucked under his legs... but yeah, I was just trying this whole time to point out that the whole thing is fiction & they can do whatever the hell they want with TFs, but so far no wild toaster dances or pregnant TF girls being rushed to the nearest medical facility/motorpool to pop out a bouncing baby micromaster or TF wedding nights.ThunderThruster wrote:Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.
you are correct, i'm not using the 7 criteria to establise anything!
as for the sexual reproduction, your right there is no solid evidence to support this, but having said that there is also only conjectural evidence to say that they dont! either way theres no conclusive evidence, at the moment, of saying if they do or dont, as it is a subject many of the writers seem to avoid!
yes its fictional so if thats what the writers wanted to do, they could!
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:That's actually all I have been trying to get across is that wether they do or not is purely preference.....sorry if it sounded like I was arguing with you. I was just trying to clearify. I never said that it wasn't possible that they could be doing the wild toaster dance, just that they never say anything about it. Personally, I find it rather hillarious to display my Energon Arcee gawking at E-scorponok's tail...tucked under his legs... but yeah, I was just trying this whole time to point out that the whole thing is fiction & they can do whatever the hell they want with TFs, but so far no wild toaster dances or pregnant TF girls being rushed to the nearest medical facility/motorpool to pop out a bouncing baby micromaster or TF wedding nights.ThunderThruster wrote:Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.
you are correct, i'm not using the 7 criteria to establise anything!
as for the sexual reproduction, your right there is no solid evidence to support this, but having said that there is also only conjectural evidence to say that they dont! either way theres no conclusive evidence, at the moment, of saying if they do or dont, as it is a subject many of the writers seem to avoid!
yes its fictional so if thats what the writers wanted to do, they could!
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:Well, going back to the Star Trek sci-fi stuff, Data engaged in several activities that served him no other purpose other than to better understand other life forms...including having a girl friend...it's not so much a stretch to think that given their ability of space travels & being known to interact with several different life forms, some of which that might not be human but still go through similar mating rituals....it's possible it could have been an older customs they picked up from some long-forgotten friendly relations they were trying to better understand.Tramp wrote:Excuse me? How do you get two life forms of the same speices (in this case, Transformers), a male and a female, engaged in a romantic relationship and engaged in courtship being for the purpose of "understanding other cultures"? That makes absolutely no sense! If this were after they had been to Earth, that might make some modicum of sense, but not relationships that have been going on for millions of years before they ever encounterd humans, and between individualts who have never been to Earth. They do not need to specifically mention sexual activity among TransFormers to make it possible. You don't need a magic bullet. All you need to do is piece the evidence together.
...not to mention, Victory is meant to take place quite a while after first contact with humans. In fact the first few episodes show Star Saber dropping their series' kid off at school.
I was referring to your argument about TFs having sex on the whole with the peg/hole comment. But the fact that your best argument for them not growing is "why shouldn't they?" still shows that your filling in gaps in you argument with nothing other than "I want it to fit together this way, so it can't be anything else."Secondly, no asking if you expect the chibis—the child TransFormers—to remain small children forever is not putting square pegs into round holes, nor is it a sign of a weak argument or lack of evidence. The children of the DinoForce look like chibi versions of their parents. They are child TransFormers. This was specifically stated. They are smaller, cuter versions of theit parents' forms with childish proportions, just like a baby wolf or baby human is a smaller, cuter version of their parents, with "child-like" proportions.
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:That's actually all I have been trying to get across is that wether they do or not is purely preference.....sorry if it sounded like I was arguing with you. I was just trying to clearify. I never said that it wasn't possible that they could be doing the wild toaster dance, just that they never say anything about it. Personally, I find it rather hillarious to display my Energon Arcee gawking at E-scorponok's tail...tucked under his legs... but yeah, I was just trying this whole time to point out that the whole thing is fiction & they can do whatever the hell they want with TFs, but so far no wild toaster dances or pregnant TF girls being rushed to the nearest medical facility/motorpool to pop out a bouncing baby micromaster or TF wedding nights.ThunderThruster wrote:Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:ThunderThruster wrote:lets try and agree on a few points that seem to be going round and around!
1: Transformers ARE mechanical lifeforms, they are living robotic beings. Just because they are not organic, does not mean that they are not alive!
2: Protoforms and 'building' TFs are the standard methods that species propogates itself, but there are other undisclosed methods, perhaps even sexually reproduction!
3: they are an alien lifeform, and therefore, IF they are capable of sexual reproduction, who is to say we would even recognise their sexual organs!
before anybody decides to argue these 3 points, take 5 minutes to compose yourselfs, and think carefully about why you are agruing or disagree with them!
question about #1: by that do you mean that they don't have to fit Tramp's criteria for life to be considered alive? Because if that's the case, I agree, & but the problem is the argument, at least on my part, is that A: there is no evidence that they reproduce sexually, & B: it's a fictionary setting, & so if the writers wanted to, they could just have them poping up from out of the ground every time the ground gets hit by lightning, & still be considered alive.
you are correct, i'm not using the 7 criteria to establise anything!
as for the sexual reproduction, your right there is no solid evidence to support this, but having said that there is also only conjectural evidence to say that they dont! either way theres no conclusive evidence, at the moment, of saying if they do or dont, as it is a subject many of the writers seem to avoid!
yes its fictional so if thats what the writers wanted to do, they could!
Eradicator wrote:OK, I'm gonna hoin this seemingly endless debate.
You all put up fine arguments, but you all say why are there WOMEN Transformers. How about why are there MEN Transformers, from a WOMEN'S point of view. I can agree with all that Transformers, aka ROBOTS in disguise do NOT have sexual organs. *shivers". I mean COME ON. People need to think about sex but not our way of sex. Something I have thought about is that, ok, we saw Silverbolt and Blackarachnia kissing in BW. Supposing when kissing, or ok, HAVING SEX without the use of our well known reproductive organs? Supposing while doing this, their spark's essence forms into one, and is put into a protoform and is the "parent's kid" ala Rattrap's aunt Arcee? I mean, they are ALIENS. They culd do things beyond our comprehension. I mean, hell, they already have mass shifting. Or what if the 2 Transformers of both sexes witness Primus putting a spark in the protoform, and they are the parents?
As for the sexes, and not the reproduction/kids, I can't think of an explanation. You all argue against each other, saying they are wrong, but how do you now you aren't? Do you have a fanwank, hell, fanmade explanation like this? We know the origins of the Transformers so far are the Quints, Primus, and the Allspark. So, do you guys have fanmade explanations? If so, please share it with me, I'd like to hear it. And please, don't tell me "Your explanation is stupid, wrong, and retarded because I'm older than you." I am just offering my opinion.
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: -Kanrabat-, Bing [Bot], Drop Bear, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]