Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THUNDERCATS #3 Cvr P 1:20 Line Art Dynamite Comics 2024 FEB240203 3P Lee + Chung"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/dynamite/thundercats/03P/t-DSC04428.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THUNDERCATS #2 Cvr C Dynamite Comics 2024 JAN240107 2C (W/CA) Shalvey (A) Moss"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/dynamite/thundercats/02C/t-DSC02051.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THUNDERCATS #2 Cvr J LTD virgin Dynamite Comics 2024 JAN240114 2J (CA) Nakayama"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/dynamite/thundercats/02J/t-DSC02948.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THUNDERCATS #3 Cvr ZD 1:15 Virgin Dynamite Comics 2024 JAN249146 3ZD (CA) Moss"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/dynamite/thundercats/03ZD/t-DSC04426.jpg)
Ken Christiansen wrote:Not totally accurate with how it appeared in the film - but it was for Hasbro's toy marketing, and I think it works as a pretty cool toy version of movie Cybertron.
GEEWUN wrote:Cybertron should look like this
BeastProwl wrote:Funny thing is, Cybertron looked different in the first film.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
GEEWUN wrote:Cybertron should look like this:
Or even this:
Not this:
MINDVVIPE wrote:Thats seriously lame. Sure Cybertron looked different a bunch, but hell even the oldschool 80s renditions were more complicated and creative than this. With all the movies over complication of robot designs, they decided to crap out on the one place its warranted. Movies just got so much wrong, its insane.
Hotrodimust wrote:I thank you for giving me my 7 scuckles of the day and I totally agree with you the first 2 pics are cybertron not the bees hive
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:MINDVVIPE wrote:Thats seriously lame. Sure Cybertron looked different a bunch, but hell even the oldschool 80s renditions were more complicated and creative than this. With all the movies over complication of robot designs, they decided to crap out on the one place its warranted. Movies just got so much wrong, its insane.
Clearly you an I have very different definitions of "complicated." For instance, a massive multilayer series of netting of variable sized is complicated to me. A planet where half of the surface is perfectly flat and smooth and the rest is a bunch of random city-like structures, not nearly as complicated.Hotrodimust wrote:I thank you for giving me my 7 scuckles of the day and I totally agree with you the first 2 pics are cybertron not the bees hive
So what are the pictures I posted of? Because they didn't look anything like the two he posted.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:GEEWUN wrote:Cybertron should look like this
So...what, you just started when WfC rolled around or something? You know, Cybertron never, ever looks the same twice, right?
G1 cartoon
G1 Marvel Comics
Beast Wars
Beast Machines
Beast Machines again
RID
Dreamwave
Armada
Energon
Cybertron...or Galaxy Force if you don't want this to be too confusing
IDW
Universe
'07 movie
Animated
War for Cybertron
Prime (The ONLY instance if Cybertron's design remaining the same between series)BeastProwl wrote:Funny thing is, Cybertron looked different in the first film.
We never really saw Cybertron in the first movie, just that bit of promotional material.
Shadowman wrote:Well, that's your opinion, sure. I happen to think this is vastly more complicated than any other version of Cybertron. Much more detail while at the same time the deeper levels still appear coherent, not simply random details, giving the planet the image of a massive series of net-like pathways and passages right down to the planet's core.
The whole design makes a ton of sense when you really think about it. It's randomized, but uniform at the same time, reflecting the inhabitants (Robots, which are famously logic-fueled) while the honey-comb appearance reflects their somewhat insectoid designs. It all comes together; a big hive, as built by robot bugs.
Hotrodimust wrote:But they are not bugs
Hotrodimust wrote:and other designs of cybertron were multi leveled.
Hotrodimust wrote:Cybertron has buildings on it like in iacon I don't see buildings in the honey comb
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Hotrodimust wrote:But they are not bugs
Insectoid. It means "bug-like," and yeah, they do look buglike. Starscream is the biggest example, Decepticon ships in DOTM also had hulls that looked like a beetle's carapace. Their young are shown in clusters of translucent eggs on stalks, even.Hotrodimust wrote:and other designs of cybertron were multi leveled.
Well, sort of. They had some depths but you couldn't really see or tell what was down there.Hotrodimust wrote:Cybertron has buildings on it like in iacon I don't see buildings in the honey comb
Which Cybertron? We've been over this, the design changes in every series, sometimes the design changes within the series itself, so you have to be specific. Still, out of all the designs I've seen, (And posted!) only some of them have random details that kinda-sorta look like buildings. The rest look like metal balls with random generic detailing.
Hotrodimust wrote:Shadowman wrote:Hotrodimust wrote:But they are not bugs
Insectoid. It means "bug-like," and yeah, they do look buglike. Starscream is the biggest example, Decepticon ships in DOTM also had hulls that looked like a beetle's carapace. Their young are shown in clusters of translucent eggs on stalks, even.Hotrodimust wrote:and other designs of cybertron were multi leveled.
Well, sort of. They had some depths but you couldn't really see or tell what was down there.Hotrodimust wrote:Cybertron has buildings on it like in iacon I don't see buildings in the honey comb
Which Cybertron? We've been over this, the design changes in every series, sometimes the design changes within the series itself, so you have to be specific. Still, out of all the designs I've seen, (And posted!) only some of them have random details that kinda-sorta look like buildings. The rest look like metal balls with random generic detailing.
Ya in the movies they do kinda look like bugs I'll give you that. And none of the cybertrons can you actually see down their but if you look at some of the drawings from Wic they do show a lot of multi layered civilization and almost every pic of cybertron has a large looking city on it and a part that looks like a hole and I said most not all. But I think the best look at the landscape would be thru the video games and it's illustrations
Hotrodimust wrote:Hotrodimust wrote:Shadowman wrote:Hotrodimust wrote:But they are not bugs
Insectoid. It means "bug-like," and yeah, they do look buglike. Starscream is the biggest example, Decepticon ships in DOTM also had hulls that looked like a beetle's carapace. Their young are shown in clusters of translucent eggs on stalks, even.Hotrodimust wrote:and other designs of cybertron were multi leveled.
Well, sort of. They had some depths but you couldn't really see or tell what was down there.Hotrodimust wrote:Cybertron has buildings on it like in iacon I don't see buildings in the honey comb
Which Cybertron? We've been over this, the design changes in every series, sometimes the design changes within the series itself, so you have to be specific. Still, out of all the designs I've seen, (And posted!) only some of them have random details that kinda-sorta look like buildings. The rest look like metal balls with random generic detailing.
Ya in the movies they do kinda look like bugs I'll give you that. And none of the cybertrons can you actually see down their but if you look at some of the drawings from Wfc they do show a lot of multi layered civilization and almost every pic of cybertron has a large looking city on it and a part that looks like a hole and I said most not all. But I think the best look at the landscape would be thru the video games and it's illustrations
And I know it meant bug like lol
MINDVVIPE wrote:I guess I forgot we were talking about the movie Cybertron. Who even cares, the movies are a joke. The only Cybertron that matters to me is the one seen in WFC, the comics, G1, pretty much anything but the movies. But ya, since they are so overly buglike in the movies, the hive can work, even though I still think it reaks of uncreativity.
Capt.Failure wrote:MINDVVIPE wrote:I guess I forgot we were talking about the movie Cybertron. Who even cares, the movies are a joke. The only Cybertron that matters to me is the one seen in WFC, the comics, G1, pretty much anything but the movies. But ya, since they are so overly buglike in the movies, the hive can work, even though I still think it reaks of uncreativity.
Let me simplify this statement: "The only Cybertron that matters is the multitude of various redesigns from the series that I like as part of my No True Scottsman view of the series, since the parts of it I don't like aren't TRUE Transformers shows."
Pardon me while I laugh at you. True Fans are the real joke here, not the movies.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blackeyedprime, D-Maximal_Primal, Fires_Of_Inferno, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], LeisterORrimmer, MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, Sabrblade