The Energon Pub

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

*cocks a shotgun*

The Happy Locust wrote:

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

****** a shotgun*

That poor poor shotgun

Psycho Warrior wrote:

The Happy Locust wrote:

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

****** a shotgun*

That poor poor shotgun

What the heck? Guess that counts as a typo. Should have been "Caulks a shotgun"

The Happy Locust wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

The Happy Locust wrote:

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

****** a shotgun*

That poor poor shotgun

What the heck? Guess that counts as a typo. Should have been "Caulks a shotgun"

Even thought that's not how it's spelled. "Caulk" refers to a gooey adhesive used for construction, which idiots (Like me!) use as a dirty joke.

The Happy Locust wrote:

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

****** a shotgun*

Best medicare EVER!

Tweezy wrote:

The Happy Locust wrote:

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

****** a shotgun*

Best medicare EVER!

No no no. I would tend to the racehorse to make it able to walk again and breed it. The people would become medical experiments.

The Happy Locust wrote:

Halo wrote:

Psycho Warrior wrote:

Halo wrote:Psycho Warrior-
How did you find out about that? The government had that classified.

I still have a peice of the shrapnel from little Susie's shattered pelvis lodged in my eye. I was across the street at the time, sitting in the gutter where my poppa left me to congeal.

Crap, I thought we took "care" of them all.

The Halo Medicare plan. We treat you with the same care we would a racehorse with a broken leg.

****** a shotgun*

NOOOO! NOT THE FACE!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh hey guys I think I lost my puncuation over the break I had prescribed by a doktor from Halo the worst medicare person of them all also I got this guy! Hey my puncuation is back!

Rodimus_Lantern wrote:I've just now seen Fight Club, Boondock Saints and Donnie Darko in the last few months.

-Does that make me a bad person?

it depends..do you know the first rule of fight club?

nemesis zenith wrote:Oh hey guys I think I lost my puncuation over the break I had prescribed by a doktor from Halo the worst medicare person of them all also I got this guy! Hey my puncuation is back!

I'm awesome, in case you've forgotten.

ALSO, IT IS NOT YOUR PLACE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. PLEASE STOP. THANKS.

nemesis zenith wrote:Oh hey guys I think I lost my puncuation over the break I had prescribed by a doktor from Halo the worst medicare person of them all also I got this guy! Hey my puncuation is back!

We don't care that you got a repaint of Movie Jazz. And we don't care that most of your entire post is just reiterating someone else's joke.

nemesis zenith wrote:

Rodimus_Lantern wrote:I've just now seen Fight Club, Boondock Saints and Donnie Darko in the last few months.

-Does that make me a bad person?

it depends..do you know the first rule of fight club?

Remember that time Halo told you to stop answering questions? I liked that one.

And, as an aside: Roddy Lantern's post was made two months ago. And it's not just something you notice all of a sudden, I spent ten goddamn minutes going through this threads backlogs trying to find out how old that post was.

I want to hurt you in ways that, so far, have only been chronicled in horror movies.

Shadowman wrote:

nemesis zenith wrote:Oh hey guys I think I lost my puncuation over the break I had prescribed by a doktor from Halo the worst medicare person of them all also I got this guy! Hey my puncuation is back!

We don't care that you got a repaint of Movie Jazz. And we don't care that most of your entire post is just reiterating someone else's joke.

nemesis zenith wrote:

Rodimus_Lantern wrote:I've just now seen Fight Club, Boondock Saints and Donnie Darko in the last few months.

-Does that make me a bad person?

it depends..do you know the first rule of fight club?

Remember that time Halo told you to stop answering questions? I liked that one.

And, as an aside: That post was made two months ago. And it's not just something you notice all of a sudden, I spent ten goddamn minutes going through this threads backlogs trying to find out how old that post was.

I want to hurt you in ways that, so far, have only been chronicled in horror movies.

Which horror movies?

Dead Metal wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

nemesis zenith wrote:Oh hey guys I think I lost my puncuation over the break I had prescribed by a doktor from Halo the worst medicare person of them all also I got this guy! Hey my puncuation is back!

We don't care that you got a repaint of Movie Jazz. And we don't care that most of your entire post is just reiterating someone else's joke.

nemesis zenith wrote:

Rodimus_Lantern wrote:I've just now seen Fight Club, Boondock Saints and Donnie Darko in the last few months.

-Does that make me a bad person?

it depends..do you know the first rule of fight club?

Remember that time Halo told you to stop answering questions? I liked that one.

And, as an aside: That post was made two months ago. And it's not just something you notice all of a sudden, I spent ten goddamn minutes going through this threads backlogs trying to find out how old that post was.

I want to hurt you in ways that, so far, have only been chronicled in horror movies.

Which horror movies?

First I thought "Slasher movies" then I thought "No, that would be too specific, I need a broader scope."

I figure I'm going to implant Xenomorph eggs in him while I make horrific phone calls from inside the house, and get a bunch of zombies and vampire to chase him, and while he's passed out I'll kill him from inside his dreams. I'll also kill a promiscuous girl, because that's how these things go.

Shadowman wrote:

Dead Metal wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

nemesis zenith wrote:Oh hey guys I think I lost my puncuation over the break I had prescribed by a doktor from Halo the worst medicare person of them all also I got this guy! Hey my puncuation is back!

We don't care that you got a repaint of Movie Jazz. And we don't care that most of your entire post is just reiterating someone else's joke.

nemesis zenith wrote:

Rodimus_Lantern wrote:I've just now seen Fight Club, Boondock Saints and Donnie Darko in the last few months.

-Does that make me a bad person?

it depends..do you know the first rule of fight club?

Remember that time Halo told you to stop answering questions? I liked that one.

And, as an aside: That post was made two months ago. And it's not just something you notice all of a sudden, I spent ten goddamn minutes going through this threads backlogs trying to find out how old that post was.

I want to hurt you in ways that, so far, have only been chronicled in horror movies.

Which horror movies?

First I thought "Slasher movies" then I thought "No, that would be too specific, I need a broader scope."

I figure I'm going to implant Xenomorph eggs in him while I make horrific phone calls from inside the house, and get a bunch of zombies and vampire to chase him, and while he's passed out I'll kill him from inside his dreams. I'll also kill a promiscuous girl, because that's how these things go.

Oh no wiping out a whole city wile you're at it?
Other then that it sounds very professional and not at all impossible

We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

Tweezy wrote:We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

But the real question is:

Was it better than the Beowulf starring Christopher Lambert?

Gutter Bunny wrote:

Tweezy wrote:We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

But the real question is:

Was it better than the Beowulf starring Christopher Lambert?

My sources tell me that the Lambert version is in fact better!

I've never actually seen it!

Tweezy wrote:

Gutter Bunny wrote:

Tweezy wrote:We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

But the real question is:

Was it better than the Beowulf starring Christopher Lambert?

My sources tell me that the Lambert version is in fact better!

I've never actually seen it!

Is it better than an average episode of Barney the Dinosaur?

Shadowman wrote:

Tweezy wrote:

Gutter Bunny wrote:

Tweezy wrote:We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

But the real question is:

Was it better than the Beowulf starring Christopher Lambert?

My sources tell me that the Lambert version is in fact better!

I've never actually seen it!

Is it better than an average episode of Barney the Dinosaur?

Nope.

Tweezy wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Tweezy wrote:

Gutter Bunny wrote:

Tweezy wrote:We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

But the real question is:

Was it better than the Beowulf starring Christopher Lambert?

My sources tell me that the Lambert version is in fact better!

I've never actually seen it!

Is it better than an average episode of Barney the Dinosaur?

Nope.

I don't get to use this often, so it's kind of a special treat for me:

By the Moons of Kanthorr!!

Shadowman wrote:

Tweezy wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Tweezy wrote:

Gutter Bunny wrote:

Tweezy wrote:We'll just make you watch Beowulf the movie 300 times for every obvious genital censor!

Seriously... I saw it today. angelina jolie had no expression but a smug smile throughout the whole movie, Beowulf did the hero pose... while naked, being censored by poorly generated CGI smoke and a sword, he kills the dragon at the end (and if you didn't know Unfurth was supposed to kill it) He never battled grendels mother, instead she succeeded in seducing him. Oh and when he does go to battle her... His clothes magically disappear! no transition scene, nothing. one frame he has his clothes on, and in the next they suddenly disappear! For no reason what-so-ever!
It was like a bad attempt to rip off 300. I seriously almost thought that they secretly let Uwe Boll direct it! The people looked like they were from shrek! While that's not a bad thing, it is in a movie that you try to pass off as realistic!
There were two good points of this movie...

-1.) A non plot related superman pose
-2.) backflipping midgets (yes, they really did have backflipping midgets!)

But the real question is:

Was it better than the Beowulf starring Christopher Lambert?

My sources tell me that the Lambert version is in fact better!

I've never actually seen it!

Is it better than an average episode of Barney the Dinosaur?

Nope.

I don't get to use this often, so it's kind of a special treat for me:

By the Moons of Kanthorr!!

I just want to know if it's better than, worse than, or just as insane as last year's Canadian version, which is called "Beowulf and Grendel". Fun Fact: B and G's Beowulf is Gerard Butler, of "300" fame.

Why am I so horribly addicted to Assassin's Creed?

Halo wrote:Why am I so horribly addicted to Assassin's Creed?

I don't know. Tim Buckley from CTRL+ALT+DEL said it was pretty much the same thing over and over, right down to the NPC lines. The only thing different from mission-to-mission was the guy you have to kill.

Halo
because it's full of awesome.