sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:tigertracks 24 wrote:I am not a mod, but you guys have to start laying off. This is getting close to political discussion, and leading towards thread derailment. Damolisher I know there is history, but your comment is unecessary, and meant to be derogatory, against the rules.
Call it a draw and move on. Opinions cannot be right or wrong, they can only be well supported by fact or not.
This can be taken either way, Tramp can be considered right, that is how I was thinking of it, but sto_vo_kor_2000 et al. I can see where the Star Wars influence comes in as well. However, unless you are Simon Furman or Don Figueroa you do not know-- so you need to concede the stalemate and return the thread to discussion, not baiting and attacks.
First of all what do you mean by "but sto_vo_kor_2000 et al"?Also I wasnt baiting or attacking and if you read all my post's you would see that I stated numerous time that I personaly beleaved something simular to what Tramp [and now you] was saying about what Sunstorm might have been hinting at.......what I've been debating with Tramp is that the orignal poster was looking for any plot hole or line that could have suggested to the readers that Meg's And Screamer were father and son and that tramp said that there was no such line ever suggested.The fact is that even thou that line is open to interpretation ,because it was never finish, It could have and did lead to that school of thought for many readers [my self not included]
I wasnt the one trying to force my point of view down other's throat's.I wasnt the one trying to speek from a position knowing all the facts and I wasnt the one who said that every one who got from that line that they were father and son must have misunderstood the statement.I'm also not the one who cant admit when I've made a mistake.
T
So before you enter a debait maybe you should read all the post in it.Tramp and myself had had these kinds of debates before and I dont thing that ether of us thing that we're attacking each other.
Brother you need to calm down a little. I did read the entire thing and you kept putting in big bold letter that he was wrong.
I am not saying he did not have it coming to him, but repeatedly telling him he is wrong like that is not going to make him suddenly switch to your side.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
YOU WERE WRONG
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:YOU WERE WRONG THIS TIME AND THERE'S NO WAY OUT OF IT
Are you telling me that these statements are not baiting someone to bite back at you?
I did see that you said you thought his ideas were right, but why can you not just let the issue thing go? Are you expecting him to say that you are right? If you've dealt with Tramp in the past you know that's not going to happen so why beat the dead horse into derailment.
"et al." refers to the others that you are defending in your debates.
You don't see how when you brought up BUSH you opened flood gates that didn't need to be? Damolisher piles on and then it goes astray from there.
I was not going after just you, if you didn't notice. I mentioned Damolisher and Tramp also. I know we all like to read our own names only, but check it out, I did not refer only to you, I simply asked you guys, ALL OF YOU GUYS-- Damolisher, Tramp, and you to let it hang as a stalemate.
You having a rough day or something? I barely mentioned anything, I just asked for it to be on topic BY EVERYONE and for you to stop calling him out
WITH BIG RED LETTERS!.
All that serves to do is embarrass and get someone worked up, like what you tried to do when you were telling me that I need to read the whole thing--in large letters. I did. Over and over, and over, which is why I asked you guys to call it a draw. It can lead to a pile on, which Damolisher gladly joined in on.