Robinson wrote:Omega-1 wrote:I'm disappointed that it will be HBK vs Ric Flair at Wrestlemania. I wanted to see Sting vs Ric Flair instead.
That would never have happened
Well, that's how it should be.
Robinson wrote:Omega-1 wrote:I'm disappointed that it will be HBK vs Ric Flair at Wrestlemania. I wanted to see Sting vs Ric Flair instead.
That would never have happened
Omega-1 wrote:Robinson wrote:Omega-1 wrote:I'm disappointed that it will be HBK vs Ric Flair at Wrestlemania. I wanted to see Sting vs Ric Flair instead.
That would never have happened
Well, that's how it should be.
Omega-1 wrote:Well, then who do you think should retire Flair? Politics and contracts aside, I can't see anybody better than Sting. Some people think that Flair should put over some up and coming star but to me, it's not a big feat for any up and coming star to beat an almost 60 year old Ric Flair. They try to make it seem like it's believable but really, it's not. It's just silly. Sting is one of the few remaining active wrestlers that was one of Flair's biggest rivals. I think it would be the most fitting to renew their feud one last time. To me, it's a more memorable moment then Shawn Michaels retiring Ric Flair. Another match could be Hogan vs Flair, but that's almost like a slap in the face to Flair.
Now that is a scenario I like. Thay could definitly work.Omega-1 wrote:I agree with that, but he didn't, so now we are talking about the best scenario for Wrestlemania. So who do you think he should wrestle if not Sting? The only other person I can think of that might make it a memorable match is maybe if he wrestled one of his sons. But because his sons are relative unknowns, it would not be as interesting a match.
Another more realistic scenerio but still unlikely is if they would have been to let Flair face Orton for the title at Wrestlemania. Everybody would think Orton would win because everybody knows Flair is retiring and Orton is the "legend killer". But then to throw a twist on it, let Flair win the title and then have the winner of Money In The Bank come down to the ring and challenge in right there and beat him for the title.
Prowl76 wrote:Now that is a scenario I like. Thay could definitly work.Omega-1 wrote:I agree with that, but he didn't, so now we are talking about the best scenario for Wrestlemania. So who do you think he should wrestle if not Sting? The only other person I can think of that might make it a memorable match is maybe if he wrestled one of his sons. But because his sons are relative unknowns, it would not be as interesting a match.
Another more realistic scenerio but still unlikely is if they would have been to let Flair face Orton for the title at Wrestlemania. Everybody would think Orton would win because everybody knows Flair is retiring and Orton is the "legend killer". But then to throw a twist on it, let Flair win the title and then have the winner of Money In The Bank come down to the ring and challenge in right there and beat him for the title.
Robinson wrote:But then you would have people complaining about rehashing storylines because thats basically what edge did at new years revolution like 2 years ago. He didnt use the MITB right away like you say, but he did use it right after the champ was in a grueling match.
Dr. Heavy B wrote:wwe is starting to plug tna and roh. this is ether the opening shot in an new promotion war. or most likly the guy from wrestle zone pluging his website
http://www.wwe.com/inside/industrynews/6549888
http://www.wwe.com/inside/industrynews/6544892
Registered users: Bing [Bot], ChatGPT [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], OpenAI [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot]