First-Aid wrote:Ok...fact number 1: Randy Moss has missed 3 games in 2004 and 3 games in 2006. Other than six games he has played in every game since 1998. Fact 2: Moss is averaging 11 TDs a season for his career and 15.9 yds per catch, 70 catches and 1100 yards per season.
Moss was a total and complete non-factor for his career in Oakland. He started this season as a WR3 on the verge being a WR2 if he could put together a solid performance for the first few games. Moss is absolutely not a WR1 in any single FFL on this side of Krypton until he proves he can put together an entire season to match what he did in Minnesota. Honestly, if you think Moss is some super star you don't play FFL at all. Burress is worth more than Moss. Curry is worth more than Moss. Colston is worth more than Moss. Megatron is worth more than Moss. Brandon Marshal is worth more than Moss. Isaac Bruce is worth more than Moss. Reggie Wayne is worth more than Moss. Antwan Randle El is worth more than Moss. Hines Ward is worth more than Moss. Ocho Cinco is worth more than Moss. You can't sit there and bestow megastar stud status on a washed up has been after a single game.
Is Colston better:he didn't do that in ONE SEASON and couldn't play the whole year. Even Stallworth, with his "bad hammy", had better averages than COlston or any of NO other WR.
It was also Colston's rookie season last year. Compare his rookie year to Stallworth's. Stallworth was absolutely mediocre and inferior to Colston in every single statistical category. Colston has almost twice as many receptions, twice the yardage, and twice the TDs. Stallworth isn't even a WR1 in any league. He's a late round WR choice and to be perfectly honest I wouldn't even start him in anything but a WR/TE flex position if I had drafted him.
Moss had a better rookie year with an extra 300 yards and twice as many TDs but he was actually good back then. Like I said, as far as I'm concerned he's nothing more than a Chris Brown at this point. Wow, he had one good game. This same logic should also easily convince you that Plaxico Burress will be the greatest wide out in the history of the NFL.
As for the best WR, I didn't mean to imply that the NE WR were better individually than the others in the NFL. What I meant is that their four top WR's are better than any other teams top four WRs...even Indianapolis. They are deeper at WR than any other team.
They might deeper but they are not superior to what Indy can put up with their two studs.