Sledge wrote:Hmm, it's probably going to involve screenshots from The Ultimate Doom, and lengthy workings out of how far Cybertron was from Earth at that time. Not something I want to try.

Well, we know one constant about Cybertron - It's gravity is roughly equal to Earth. In all depictions I know of, humans are able to run about on Cybertron as if it had normal gravity and Earth-like Atmosphere.
We can't make the same statement about the moons of course because the only human we see on them is Spike, who is wearing an exosuit.
As for the other issue, what is annoying to me is Saber's willingness to pull totally unsupported suppositions out of thin air, and then insist they support his argument.
That's where the Type I vs Type II thing comes in. Different fundamental approaches, with each of you fundamentally disagreeing with the other's approach. If the past is any indicator, you aren't going to change that.
That and his posting two or three mahoosive posts in a row that don't address a simple question.
The multi-posting is getting annoying, but I'm being forgiving so far because the length of his posts would actually make it awkward to post the full thing in one post. And as far as I know, failure to be concise doesn't violate any regs.
If you recall, this started with Saber's assertion that various terms were used in the G1 cartoon. I asked for proof of that, and everything went tits up from there. Thing is, what we're discussing isn't really a question of how "real" we should treat a fictional reality. If you assert that a term was used in a TV show, it should be easy enough to prove.
Okay, reading back, here's how it goes as far as I can tell:
[paraphrasing]
Sto: Beast Wars follows the Comic because so many things are mentioned in BW that weren't in the cartoon.
Saber: Actually, all of those things did appear in the cartoon...
And that's when it gets confusing. You guys required that the stuff actually be named in the cartoon, while he was really only attending to whether or not they
appeared. The Ark and The Nemesis may never have been named in the cartoon, but the ships depicted in Beast Wars were visually identical to the ships depicted in the G1 Cartoon, rather than how they appeared in the comic. So, if you place equal emphasis on both what is said and what is seen,
The Ark in Beast Wars appears both in the Comic (name) and in the Cartoon (image).
And again, here's the perspective difference: to Saber (and to me actually) the fact that the ship is called
The Ark in Beast Wars and not called something else in the G1 cartoon, is sufficient grounds to refer to the G1 cartoon ship as
The Ark.
AS to the original topic, I used to believe BW was an extension of the Marvel Comics, especially since a whole lot of Retcons were done afterward to make it sync up better with G2. I got in a lot of arguments with people back in the day that said it was based on the cartoon. In retrospect, there is nearly equal evidence either way, which leads me to conclude, that Beast Wars must be the future of an
additional G1 continuity that combines features of the Cartoon and the Comic.