First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
Posted by Hotrod
Jun 9, 2007 at 5:26pm CDT
11,875 views
View Discussion
Sign in
or
Join
to reply
More Bots. More News. More Awesome.
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by Scaleface
Jun 9, 2007
I would really rather pay a little more for the "Real Gear" toy is they actually did something. Like making them a working flashlight, or a cheapo digital camera, or having the video gamer one actually play a cheap LCD game.
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by Ricky_Stream
Jun 9, 2007
those 2 take batteries so... at least the flashlight works! don't know about the cam
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by Skowl
Jun 9, 2007
'Tight Shot' eh?
I think Erector is gonna have some competition when it comes to 'most unfortunate name ever'
EDIT: WOOOOOO! 2000th post!!!
I think Erector is gonna have some competition when it comes to 'most unfortunate name ever'
EDIT: WOOOOOO! 2000th post!!!
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Erector? Definetly don't want to see what that looks like.
Comment by Blurrz
Jun 9, 2007
Skowl wrote:'Tight Shot' eh?
I think Erector is gonna have some competition when it comes to 'most unfortunate name ever'
EDIT: WOOOOOO! 2000th post!!!
Erector? Definetly don't want to see what that looks like.
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
worse is still windbreaker.
tight shot says it doubles as a camera so....maybe i'll get it
Comment by Heavy B
Jun 9, 2007
Skowl wrote:'Tight Shot' eh?
I think Erector is gonna have some competition when it comes to 'most unfortunate name ever'
EDIT: WOOOOOO! 2000th post!!!
worse is still windbreaker.
tight shot says it doubles as a camera so....maybe i'll get it
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by 1337W422102
Jun 9, 2007
Flash Bang is a great name, too bad the toy sucks.
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by sideswipe6520
Jun 9, 2007
what the H#ll are those? Do they have bot modes? Or are they just basically branded CRAP I will ignore
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by Zeedust
Jun 9, 2007
CS Brawl: The throttlebot from HELL. 
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by tentagil
Jun 9, 2007
They are Roleplay toys. Like the Voice changing helmet and the transforming blasters. We've seen several of them so far. No bot modes, just switch from a toy phone, camera, flashlight, etc, into some kind of toy weapon.
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by First-Aid
Jun 9, 2007
Blurrz, grats on post 2000!
This is an interesting idea from Hasbro. It's obviously not going to appeal to us as adult collectors that much...but I suspect that the age group the toys are aimed at (5-10 y/o) will like them....something they can pretend with. If they function then all the better. Doubt I'll get em myself (at least until they are on clearance and only for wall decoration)...
This is an interesting idea from Hasbro. It's obviously not going to appeal to us as adult collectors that much...but I suspect that the age group the toys are aimed at (5-10 y/o) will like them....something they can pretend with. If they function then all the better. Doubt I'll get em myself (at least until they are on clearance and only for wall decoration)...
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by Overcracker
Jun 9, 2007
Congrats on the 2000 post Skowl.
Don't bash poor poor Erector. He's a yellow crane, its not his fault they came up with a name worthy of the Kiss Players line.
http://www.tfu.info/1989/Autobot/Erector/erector.htm
Anyway, Brawl I like him more in the larger size, just love the arm cannon.
Not much for the role playing sub line. so I'll probably pass on these. They both look like they light up with 3 triple a batteries apparently
Don't bash poor poor Erector. He's a yellow crane, its not his fault they came up with a name worthy of the Kiss Players line.
http://www.tfu.info/1989/Autobot/Erector/erector.htm
Anyway, Brawl I like him more in the larger size, just love the arm cannon.
Not much for the role playing sub line. so I'll probably pass on these. They both look like they light up with 3 triple a batteries apparently
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
That, would actually be Skrowl
Heh... they could have thought of a bettor name for a Yellow Crane. Maybe Liftarm, Liftor,.. like c'mon.. Erector?
Comment by Blurrz
Jun 10, 2007
First-Aid wrote:Blurrz, grats on post 2000!
That, would actually be Skrowl
Overcracker wrote:Don't bash poor poor Erector. He's a yellow crane, its not his fault they came up with a name worthy of the Kiss Players line.
http://www.tfu.info/1989/Autobot/Erector/erector.htm
Heh... they could have thought of a bettor name for a Yellow Crane. Maybe Liftarm, Liftor,.. like c'mon.. Erector?
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by jsmith41
Jun 10, 2007
So Real Gear are T.E.C.H. now? So people couldn't distinguish the wave 1 toys from the actual electronics they're modeled after? I wonder if the same people wanted to open Jazz and drive him home from Target.
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
I wondered that too. Who would buy a toy for $10 thinking that it really was a working digital camera?
Comment by Dagon
Jun 11, 2007
jsmith41 wrote:So Real Gear are T.E.C.H. now? So people couldn't distinguish the wave 1 toys from the actual electronics they're modeled after? I wonder if the same people wanted to open Jazz and drive him home from Target.
I wondered that too. Who would buy a toy for $10 thinking that it really was a working digital camera?
Re: First Images of Cyber Slam Brawl, Tight Shot, and Flash Bang
(view post)
Comment by Riotflea
Jun 11, 2007
Better question, why not put some budget into it and make a more expensive robot that is ACTUALLY a working digicam?
It wouldn't even need to be 1 megapixels in quality, just the resolution of a super-cheap webcam.
So, so, SO many missed opportunities...
It wouldn't even need to be 1 megapixels in quality, just the resolution of a super-cheap webcam.
So, so, SO many missed opportunities...
