The Energon Pub

Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:27 pm

Wow that old? Really? I had no idea it had been around for that long, no wonder it's so blury! It is rather crazy people still argue about it.

....Whats a USO?

News Credits: 1 · Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:27 pm

Moonbase2 wrote:I just read that the original Bigfoot video is 40 years old today. I can't believe how we all still debate whether it's real or not after all these years.

Wow I didnt know that.

News Credits: 1 · Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:54 pm

Wow, the alleged Chupacabra looks nothing like artists renditions. I suppose if something ever was found, it wouldn't be as embelished as what others think they saw. I know if I was scared out of my wits if I ever encountered some weird creature, I might see it as different than it really was.

Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:23 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I wouldnt expect them to live in any of the lakes they've been reported to be seen in....some of lakes do open into larger bodys of water it is posible that these "Dinosaurs" as you called them are migrating trew the areas that they've been seen at.

Fair enough, but that excludes Loch Ness.

Tangent wrote:This does not mean Nessie is real. It's too cold in Loch Ness for any reptile, theres not enough food, the place has been pinged to death with no results and come on, they need a whole load of these things to breed, they would have found one by now if there was any.

Thank you.

And those eyewitness pics don't mean that's exactly what it looked like. And those renders are obviously imaginative in nature.

Those photographs are actually close enough to the drawings to be a realistic version of them.

Tangent wrote:That's just a manky wolf/dog. Or someone shaved it.

Exactly. That's what chupacabra is. That manky wolf dog is what people have been calling chupacabra. Why does everything have to be crazy and exagerrated like those renders?

This is cryptozoology at work right here. The human imagination will come up with something much more amazing than what the real occurance was.

It's actually kind of tragic. We have solved the mystery of the chupacabra, but people will continue to deny it because the real answer isn't as exciting as the legends.

News Credits: 1 · Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:23 pm

Dark Zarak wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I wouldnt expect them to live in any of the lakes they've been reported to be seen in....some of lakes do open into larger bodys of water it is posible that these "Dinosaurs" as you called them are migrating trew the areas that they've been seen at.

Fair enough, but that excludes Loch Ness..

Yes it does......but it doesnt exclued Champ or the many others that have been reported.I for one think its more likely a long necked whale.

Dark Zarak wrote:
Tangent wrote:This does not mean Nessie is real. It's too cold in Loch Ness for any reptile, theres not enough food, the place has been pinged to death with no results and come on, they need a whole load of these things to breed, they would have found one by now if there was any.

Thank you..

I agree here as well....Even if there was something there long ago it could not have lived this long with out a food source but there have been reports of some underwater caves where they may find some remains.

Dark Zarak wrote:
Tangent wrote:That's just a manky wolf/dog. Or someone shaved it.

Exactly. That's what chupacabra is. That manky wolf dog is what people have been calling chupacabra. Why does everything have to be crazy and exagerrated like those renders?.

Again we agree....I never thought he was much more then a K-9 large rodent hybrid.

Dark Zarak wrote:This is cryptozoology at work right here. The human imagination will come up with something much more amazing than what the real occurance was.

It's actually kind of tragic. We have solved the mystery of the chupacabra, but people will continue to deny it because the real answer isn't as exciting as the legends.

Thats always the case with all myseries.