Ravenous Nightwind wrote:So many people are into the whole well your only one sex, but I don't think that's entirely true. The natives believed that transsexuals had two souls though, I always thought that was interesting. I think people are way to much into what should be considered as male or female when they should just let people be who they are instead of judging them for what they aren't. Uniqueness should be allowed. x3 After all..we're supposed to be sentient beings. XD
Sorry if it's gauche to comment on something said so long ago, but I have to play devil's advocate for a moment:
It's important that we maintain some sort of standard for differentiating on the basis of biological sex. It's simply a matter of necessity and practicality in the world of scientific research - for some research, especially medical research, if we have people identifying as their psychological sex rather than their biological sex, we may wind up with increased error variance, especially with small research populations. Ergo, we need to retain some absolutist terminology. That said, in my field we're more interested in a person's self-identification than in their plumbing (unless we're working on a hypothesis based on the theory of evolution), but I can certainly see how pharmaceutical and genetic researchers might get frustrated.
Obviously, one could argue that lay-society still needs that distinction so that individuals know 'who' they are getting romantically involved with. I agree that we'd be better off without the religious constraints or social norms that would demand this, but if your long term goal is to have kids, well, that's probably part of the reason humans are so sexually dimorphic. But then, there are surrogate mothers, and who knows where sex-reassignment surgery will be in a few decades, so really, it's just the scientific community's reasons that I would defend.
Also in reference to the first page:
1. There are communities where a higher male than female population works, but I would agree that 20:1 is probably pushing the limits of practicality, and Transformers probably have worse than a 20:1 ratio (would be interesting to know what the actual ratio is, perhaps broken down by continuity).
2. I'm straight, but I still think G1 Jazz is hot (for someone made out of metal). I mean, he's a spec ops soldier, culture-specialist, and all around fun guy that turns into a Porsche. The guy was practically designed to appeal to masculine individuals.