trence5 wrote:1. Have Optimus actually look like Optimus. I couldn't believe that was him when he first came out the pool. At the one in the comics that was pre-earth mode LOOKED like Optimus.
2. At least 2 more Autobots (Arcee being one)and one new decepticon (an original female character) and the "new" decepticon characters having ol' school names (Blackout=Vortex and Devestator=Brawl).
3. LESS FOCUS ON HUMANS. Someone once pointed out that it was like a Superman movie that focused more on Jimmy Olsen.
4. Ironhide being red instead of black. And actually acting like the G-1 personality instead of some borderline Triggerhappy nut (he wanted to shoot everything). Ironhide was an old solider but nothing like the movie one.
5. Michael J. Fox as BumbleBee.
6. Carly instead of Mikaela. I have her keep calling Sam Spike

.
7. That there was a Prime before Optimus Prime. Didn't really care for the whole Optimus and Megatron ruling Cybertron together

Uhm... no fembots or cons please. I don't even want to think of the war you might start from that comment... the whole Arcee for tf2 thing...
Plus arcee, and any fembots... aren't really needed. I'm sorry, but the fembots didn't really do anything positive for the franchise except bring up the question, do transformers reproduce like humans. Thats a question the franchise doesn't need for multiple reasons. One it makes us transformers fans look even geekier than we actually are, second Arcee blew character wise, and I honestly don't see Arcee being any different for Tf2, unless they made her really macho, and at that point they might as well just make her a dude.
As for all your other "changes," who cares if Ironhide was black and not red? The color didn't make Ironhide who he was, while I do agree with you somewhat on the personality. That needed an alteration, but only minor so he wasn't gun happy, but more than itchy to sock it to the 'cons.
What the hell is the michael j. fox as bumblebee thing? I don't get that, unless you're trying to make a joke on his parkinsons thing. And if you are you're a terrible person.
Mikaela as a name was fine. This wasn't G1, so while it could have been Carly, Mikaela will work fine too. Sorry.
Sam works better than Spike (again not G1), because Spike isn't something you'd name your kid. Thats more of a thing you'd name a dog.
Optimus wasn't the one who landed in the pool.... so no **** it didn't look like him. If you actually paid attention to that scene, you see that the guy who landed in the pool scanned the black pickup alt right after the whole "oh my god what happened to the pool" scene when the guy came out of his house.
The whole reason for the focus on humans in this as opposed to on the transformers themselves is the same story as half my responses. Not G1. Different story and focus. Besides, the casual movie goer needs to be convinced this isn't jsut your average sci-fi movie about giant robots. To get people on the edge of their seat, you have to throw in a human element to the mix and make it more like the transformer's war is now our war. Besides, now that an overall plot has been introduced, the focus can shift alittle bit more towards the transformers as they fight on earth (aka movie 2 and movie 3).
And your prime idea... while interesting (considering you pretty much got the idea from the war within) probably wouldn't matter and just confuse the casual movie goer. Are the 2 "primes" the same person, a reincarnation? Etc. To make sure people wouldn't have this confusion they would have to take more time to explain something that has nothing to do with the main plot. Thats not economic. Period.
Keep into mind that any decisions hollywood makes, unless its a star wars or star trek movie, they only care about the general movie goer, so most of the decisions will be dictated around that. Its not that they won't cater to the basics for old fans to enjoy it too, its just some changes need to be made, and those changes can be quite drastic ( as you can see from the designs, plot points, and even the characters themselves).