Sabrblade wrote:Don't forget that there are a LOT of repeated listings for the same figures, rather than each and every listing being its own figure.
Also, all the "Titan" stuff refers to PVC figurines (like the SDCC Titan Guardians were) rather than more Metroplex-sized toys.
There's the Sabr we love!

Thanks for the clarification on the "Titan" listings specifically, though I think it'd be a little foolish to assume Hasbro has further plans to release more "Titans" like Metro...
Also, that Arcee image is hideous. Too manly IMO.
Sabrblade wrote:ILL-Star wrote:What if the Leader Class Megatron were Beast Wars Megatron?
A giant toy for the multiverse's smallest Megatron?

To be fair, "giant toy" is hardly the best description for the shrinking leader-class toys Hasbro has been putting out lately!

Unless we're assuming that most of us trash the bulk of our toys in favor of new releases, and in such a scenario, Leader-class would be comparatively "giant" when looking at current releases.
Sabrblade wrote:rdrunr89 wrote:And how come the names of Slag (Slug) and Sludge (Slash) are changed???

For Slag, it's because the word "slag" is a slur word in Britain, meaning something like "whore". That's why he was named "Slug" in Fall of Cybertron.
For Sludge, who knows. Maybe they lost the rights to the name or something.
That's a stupid reason to change a name, IMO. Unless "Slag" was specifically slurring an individual, I will never understand this insipid need to please everyone. Even "whores".

Certainly if some British brats are using the word "slag" pejoratively, it can hardly be blamed on "Slag", the dinobot, for introducing them to naughty language?
Sludge, by comparison (and strictly IMO), is pretty generic, so I could care less if he goes from generic name A to generic name B. But, I like how "Slag" sounded like a made-up expletive a TF would say. "Slug" has such a defeatist, common tone to it.
wolverinetodd wrote:So when is the next Toy Show....
And like so many of us diehard fans, we're impatiently awaiting the movie's Dinobots and their corresponding figures, but I'll hold my excitement until I've seen the final toys once Bay screws things up for them.
I agree with just about all of that. You covered a ton of stuff to really respond to, but I will say that I almost prefer Universe Brawn over iGear's version, as the iGear scale feels too large for my tastes. I get that they're going for deluxe-ish size... but shouldn't SOME of the TFs be smaller? I really wish they stuck to the not-Seaspray and not-Huffer scale. I think not-Huffer is one of their best releases... and they had to go and jack up all the scales!
xyl360 wrote:
"my beloved Hasbro", that's a laugh

. There's a reason I usually buy Takara, not Hasbro.
But my point is, if you look at the Generations line right now, specifically the "Thrilling 30", it's all about celebrating the fans and the origins/past of the brand, which is pretty far off from us being an afterthought since I'm pretty sure the kids of today were not alive 30 years ago

. Hasbro focuses on the kids plenty with Rescue Bots, TF:Prime, the upcoming movie etc. but Generations has always been and likely will continue to be a more adult oriented line full of homages to and versions of characters from the past which have little to no relevance to the kids.
It was more of an ironic choice of words toward Hasbro, not an attack on your personal vestment in the company.

Besides, Takara is Hasbro's whipping boy!

(Just sayin', a better paint job does not improve a crappy, smaller, hollowed-out mold - and given the opportunity, Takara consistently keeps design flaws and offers mere paint improvements. But correct me with some examples if I'm wrong. Other than MP, which is arguably all Takara).
I knew you'd mention THRILLING 30 as a defense of Hasbro ignoring collectors, but... well, even you must realize it only took 30 years for some of these releases, right? So I guess if a company pays attention once, every 30 years, they are officially respectful of current customers.

Your future reply could be, "what about 25th anniversary?", etc. Okay, I will concede that on certain anniversaries, Hasbro does in fact release toys aimed at older fans - kind of like a bad wife/husband, who takes you out for dinner once a year!

Ohhhh, I am just enveloped in Hasbro love and affection! What more could I ask for?! A 30th Anniversary celebration!!! HURRAH!!!

A lot of us are looking into dating other people at this point. Toyworld, iGear, FansProject, KFC, too many to really mention from memory, and even more debuting next year. I'm just not fond of "you should be grateful for the little you get, brat!" argument. I am grateful! For any awesome Hasbro release. But sometimes it's time to concede that a good company has been running the brand in a direction that doesn't coincide with your own, and much like a Nintendo-fanboy who has grown up, it's time to move onto greener pastures. Time to ask some of the hard questions, like "Why is it so essential to have Bay change everything rather than go for a G1-classic?" The TMNT franchise is enjoying a sweet revival BECAUSE they went back to their roots.
Incidentally, kids enjoy G1 a lot when given the chance (ask my 2 yr old). If Hasbro gave a sh*t, they could try and promote the old cartoon a little better, and sell these "older guys" toys to plenty of kids. Oh, and Prime didn't do well with kids, apparently, so I'm not sure it's appropriate to say it's for kids (the next show is going to be more "kid-friendly", after all).
The point is that a lot of people hate on G1-fans as "being stuck in the past", without letting kids decide for themselves. G1 had a lot of charm, and Hasbro has decidedly "moved on" with extreme prejudice and disregard. It's disheartening. Especially to younger generations who DO enjoy G1. Ehhh, but sorry, I think I got off topic here!