Mykltron wrote:shajaki wrote:ScottyP wrote:GuyIncognito wrote:OK, I'll be the anal person who points out that "Prime's" is possessive, not plural.
It's cool. It bugged the crap out of me too, only because the thread title was like "HEY I'M PLURAL" except that it wasn't.
ugh... alright grammar police. the title was a joke. i was actually going to name it "prime's's".
Hard.. to... type... when... brain... is... spasmingaboutthebadgrammar.
Have to admit... (figuratively) bugging the crap out of me, as well. Bad enough to have the error in the first place, but it especially stands out as brain-spasming since the thread title makes a specific declaration of plural when there
is no plural in said title.
And if, as shajaki is now claiming, it was a deliberate error on his part at an attempt at humor... Then I fear it seems to have failed, and rather than humorous it does just come off as a poorly written title. (Unless, of course, the joke was at
our expense, and shajaki is laughing at our grammar-fueled rage over his title... in which case, bravo, sir. Bravo.)
Anyway, on to the topic at hand. Even though I do own a large collection of Optimus Primes, this is one mold I do not own. By the time of this film, I had been rather put off of the Bay-verse as a whole, and thus hadn't collected any of the toys associated with it. Still, this was the one mold that did tempt me, and I did consider it. I may someday still cave in on that point. If I did, I dare say that that one from the Platinum Autobots United five pack certainly is the nicest of the bunch. Pity, though, it would come with four other figures that I would have absolutely no desire for.
