ZeroWolf wrote:william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Primal wrote:Yeah, the 2 are very different and offer very different options. One really can't be considered best considering there are very few similarities and they try to fulfill 2 very different things

I am pretty sure one will be more definite. But while I am pretty certain as to which one it is, I will wait till we have all the individual images to hammer in my point

Surely that all depends on what you're after, if it's g1 accuracy then of course one will be better but if you don't care about g1 accuracy at all (like yours truly, unless it's something really stupid like having a sky lynx repaint sit in for deathsarus) then it doesn't really work that way and the other one most likely works out the best, considering the extras.
I'd still rather hear about what takara are doing about leokaiser
I wasnt thinking about it in terms of G1 accuracy, but more in terms of having these characters be their own unique toys. If the idea of Combiner Wars is to mix and match, the fun of trying new combinations is amplified by how diverse the toys are. And beyond that, you'd like your combiner to look different than the other combiners and thus its cooler the more distinct he looks from the rest.
Or more simply, to me a character's most defining feature is the face. The body can be different, but if the face is the exact same, it either becomes the same character disguised as someone else, or another character wearing the mask of someone else. My end goal is to have a bunch of combiners looking distinct from one another and them not sharing the same face is vital.
So the world thankfully presents me 2 options. One (Hasbro) which is a combiner made of deritive components that look really similar to toys I already have (5/7) and another which is only has one component (lightspeed) which isn't a heavy remold.
Also, most people dont know yet, though it was written several pages back and confirmed by others, but Hasbro's lightspeed retains (and highlights) the lightbar at the top of the streetwise mold. Also, supposedly none of them have new facesculpts in the Hasbro version but people seem tohave made peace with that as well.
As I said before, it will look more aparant once we see the inidividual molds but I am certain that the way Strafe is handled in both versions will be a nice basis and alegory on which to evaluate the combiner as a whole. I predict a lot of fans willbe dissapointed by the Hasbro version.
Also, I am a man of my word and I wrote this back in October:
william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote: The drill part would need better molding to make Nosecone though. The one the club is doing wouldn't be fully satisfactory considering the drill is small.
He needs a nice meaty drill to widen all those crevices and enter with pride! How's he gonna excavate any cave to satisfaction with the tiny thing the club gave him?
And Takara fulfilled that. I would be hypocrytic not to encourage their hard work and dedication.
Oh wow, I wrote a lot about this before:
WJ88 wrote:So yeah, not a fan of how Hasbro is handling Bruticus and I am much less a fan of Computron.
I said this a while back when people were clamoring for one (when scattershot was revealed) that I wished we didnt get it. I saw it coming. We had that Ramhorn revealed and it was a straight up repaint of brawl, still nothing wrong since its of a character we wouldnt get otherwise and a figure most fans wont get anyways. I was fine with it being like that. But when I saw that itty bitty drill accesory I was getting scared. Is this really what Hasbro would do for Nosecone? Because that is extremely lazy. The Drill isnt even part o the figure!! So yeah, seeing what scattershot looked like and what nosecone could look like, I didnt want a computron, not like this. But people clamoured for it. And they got it ... yay.
And you know what, thanks to Takara, I wont be getting that Computron, but another one with a nice meaty drill