The Energon Pub

News Credits: 1 · by **Venomous Prime** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:02 am

Morgan was green. Its taken him quite awhile to get to where he is. He's not that great yet, but he's getting there. TNA probably has a start in that man eventually

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:23 am

original sin wrote:Morgan was green. Its taken him quite awhile to get to where he is. He's not that great yet, but he's getting there. TNA probably has a start in that man eventually

He was on WWE TV 6 years ago. If you remember, he was on Lesnar's team at the 2003 Survivor Series, and he was in the 2004 Royal Rumble. He might have been green then, but he's gotten much better since. I wonder why WWE didn't have the patience with him. They'd have a big, young, impressive star on their hands had they hung onto him. Maybe Kane would have someone his own size and ability to play with.

Instead of the "Punjabi Playboy." :lol:

News Credits: 1 · by **Venomous Prime** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:14 am

Last time they tried taking someone so young and fresh and turning them into a star we got stuck with Cena and Lesnar got an ego.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 pm

original sin wrote:Last time they tried taking someone so young and fresh and turning them into a star we got stuck with Cena and Lesnar got an ego.

Good point. Cena. Ugh. Honestly, I actually enjoyed Lesnar's work, as limited as he was. But his WMXIX match against Angle was freaking awesome. Except for the f**ked up shooting star press. I actually thought he killed himself. I remember he later said he was actually knocked out, and Angle had to take him through the rest of the match. He didn't remember what happened. And Cena...well, I actually tolerated him when he was a heel and did all the raps on people, but I couldn't stand him for the last 5-6 years.

News Credits: 487 · by **Darth Bombshell** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:32 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:I wonder why WWE didn't have the patience with him. They'd have a big, young, impressive star on their hands had they hung onto him.

Have you forgotten that the entire company was revolving around Captain Trips and his Precious Big Gold Belt at the time?

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:49 pm

Darth Bombshell wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:I wonder why WWE didn't have the patience with him. They'd have a big, young, impressive star on their hands had they hung onto him.

Have you forgotten that the entire company was revolving around Captain Trips and his Precious Big Gold Belt at the time?

Oh...Yes, yes. I should have known. It is the reason I stopped watching for about 5 years. HHH is like Hogan in WCW.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:19 pm

Another reason to like Maria.

Plus her tongue might actual rival Gene Simmons' in size.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:19 am

And I'm currently watching the 1994 Summerslam DVD. *Made in America* Lex Luger. :lol:

Also, I forgot how damn HOT Alundra Blayze was back then. That girl had BOOTY. She's probably about 50 now...

News Credits: 1 · by **Venomous Prime** » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:49 pm

She's 46...I never really found her attractive.

Miss Madness/Mona/Molly Holly on the other hand...now her butt was awesome and she had a gorgeous face.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:04 pm

original sin wrote:She's 46...I never really found her attractive.

Her face wasn't the most attractive, but she had a ROCKIN' body. especially in those skintight singlets she wore all the time. In WCW they put her in shorts and a bra, which for some reason didn't have the same appeal.

Miss Madness/Mona/Molly Holly on the other hand...now her butt was awesome and she had a gorgeous face.

I agree completely. I remember the 15th anniversary Raw show, where they showed her and Mickie James side by side talking. I thought I was looking at twins. I would have loved to be the meat in that sandwich. :twisted:

And then when Mickie James started *dating* Cena she lost all her appeal.

by **G1-Junkie** » Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:18 pm

Undertaker for ever!

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:24 pm

OK. Yes. The Undertaker. I am probably one of the few people who wishes he was back to his biker character.

I just watched WrestleMania XII. The Iron Man match has to be the greatest WrestleMania match of all time. Closely followed by a few others involving either Bret Hart or Shawn Michaels...and the fight between Goldust and Roddy Piper was funny and gross at the same time.

Like Cyberstrike on Facebook · by **Cyberstrike** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:42 am

Rodimus Prime wrote:OK. Yes. The Undertaker. I am probably one of the few people who wishes he was back to his biker character.

I liked the biker persona too, although I guess it did kind of take away a lot of the mystique the "classic" Undertaker. I guess they could have tried to combined both versions of the characters. Maybe having Undertaker said he joined Bike Gang or something. :-?

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:12 pm

Cyberstrike wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:OK. Yes. The Undertaker. I am probably one of the few people who wishes he was back to his biker character.

I liked the biker persona too, although I guess it did kind of take away a lot of the mystique the "classic" Undertaker. I guess they could have tried to combined both versions of the characters. Maybe having Undertaker said he joined Bike Gang or something.

LOL. I like the classic Taker as well. I was never really impressed with his "devil" character in 1999. But i do wish he would start "evolving" again, and end his career as the *American Badass* it would be a good way to come full circle.

News Credits: 2024 · by **Hotrod** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:14 am

Looks like WWE dodged a major bullet by not resigning Jeff Hardy. He was arrested for trafficing in controlled substances:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2009/09/jeff-hardy-arrested-wwe.html

He needs a lot of help.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:12 am

Wow. Talk about nick of time...he left last Friday, didn't he?

News Credits: 2024 · by **Hotrod** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:03 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:Wow. Talk about nick of time...he left last Friday, didn't he?

Yep. I like Jeff Hardy in the ring but he is so self destructive.

News Credits: 7 · by **shortround** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:41 pm

My big question is are they going to keep the belt on cm punk or is the undertaker going to win a breaking point.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:55 pm

It's submission-only. I've never seen the Undertaker submit to anyone. He's not going to start with Punk. Taker's going to win it with that triangle-chokehold thing he used to use. That move is great.

News Credits: 2024 · by **Hotrod** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:02 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:It's submission-only. I've never seen the Undertaker submit to anyone. He's not going to start with Punk. Taker's going to win it with that triangle-chokehold thing he used to use. That move is great.

Unless they want Taker to fued with someone else so they have an interference angle. But I doubt it. Taker wins the belt which hopefully means Orton retains against Cena.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:14 pm

Hotrod wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:It's submission-only. I've never seen the Undertaker submit to anyone. He's not going to start with Punk. Taker's going to win it with that triangle-chokehold thing he used to use. That move is great.

Unless they want Taker to fued with someone else so they have an interference angle. But I doubt it. Taker wins the belt

Well it's submission only so even interference wouldn't be disqualification. unless someone helps Punk beat Undertaker unconscious which could technically be called submission

which hopefully means Orton retains against Cena.

I hope so but I don't think that will happen. I mean, they can only keep up Cena vs. Orton for so long before it becomes boring. (For ime it already did) and if Cena doesn't have the title, what good is he? Orton can actually wrestle and has a good inring character whereas Cena is nothing without a belt. I hate that guy.

News Credits: 1 · by **Venomous Prime** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:02 pm

I'd much rather Punk keep the title. He's far more entertaining then anyone else in the main event.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:20 pm

original sin wrote:I'd much rather Punk keep the title. He's far more entertaining then anyone else in the main event.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing, but how would Taker lose? He would have to either actually submit, or maybe if Matt hardy comes in and accidentally knocks him out cold? I'm having flashbacks to the I Quit match between The Hitman and Stone Cold at WMXIII where Bret put Austin in the sharpshooter but Austin never gave up he just passed out. Still a win for Bret Hart.

Anyway, I never understood why Taker gets a titleshot right away. He just came back. I think that's why he might lose and feud with Matt Hardy. We'll see. Personally, I'm waiting for Raw and that fine fine thing named Trish Stratus to return to be the guest host. =P~

News Credits: 7 · by **shortround** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:04 pm

There are all sort of big question to answered tomorrow night like is dx going to beat legacy again or will it be 1 and 1 and how long will the feud continue. I understand why there doing it and all because it much easier on both shawn michaels and triple h to wrestling in tag matches than in singles matches since the injure rate is much lower for tag team wrestlers than single wrestlers. What is the big announcement that batista is going to make monday.