The Energon Pub

by **Tangent** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:34 pm

I have no Energon figures!

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:36 pm

Tangent wrote:I have no Energon figures!

*slaps you for not having any*

I own all but one figure!

*Slaps self hard, and lies unconcious on the floor.

by **Tangent** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:43 pm

The Master Blaster wrote:
Tangent wrote:I have no Energon figures!

*slaps you for not having any*

I own all but one figure!

*Slaps self hard, and lies unconcious on the floor.

Ouch, that stings!

*Steals all your figures whilst your unconcious*

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:46 pm

Tangent wrote:
The Master Blaster wrote:
Tangent wrote:I have no Energon figures!

*slaps you for not having any*

I own all but one figure!

*Slaps self hard, and lies unconcious on the floor.

Ouch, that stings!

*Steals all your figures whilst your unconcious*

*Shakes fist, despite the fact is unconscious*

News Credits: 1 · by **doomboy536** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:37 am

The Master Blaster wrote:
Tangent wrote:
The Master Blaster wrote:
Tangent wrote:I have no Energon figures!

*slaps you for not having any*

I own all but one figure!

*Slaps self hard, and lies unconcious on the floor.

Ouch, that stings!

*Steals all your figures whilst your unconcious*

*Shakes fist, despite the fact is unconscious*

*slaps Master Blaster's fist, just for lawl*

Halfway through essay two

by **MegaDave** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:43 am

Fellow brits,
Tho i can see most of you are now unconcious due to energon inspired slapping fits, i require a favour.

Ive gone to a lot of effort putting toether daily minicon photogalleries as an alterantive advent callender for Xmas.
Rather than receiving a small piece of chocolate - receive a small and awesome minicon each day.
Ive gone to lengths to ensure that the content will be exclusive to this thread by only using minicons that are not featured in any other galleries on this site and taking all the photos myself of my own collection.

Unfortunatly the thread seems to be dying in the water with very few views or responses. I have the minicons ready and waiting but if no one wants to see it i may as well stop posting.

So i ask of you 2 things:
- Should i continue in my endevour even just to prove my british tenacity or stop after a few more days if it continues to ilict no response.
- Can you help support my efforts and check out the thread in my sig. Leave a comment either positive or negative. Either would be appreciated.

YAAARRRR i be counting on ye me hearties!

Dave

News Credits: 1 · by **doomboy536** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 am

It's a great idea mate, I just hadn't seen that thread. I'll be watching it every day now

Now, back to the slapping

*slaps table*

Ow, that hurt

by **Lord T** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:24 am

While I'm not a fan of Minicons (so sue me

) it is a very clever idea that I don't wanna see go away. Keep it going!

News Credits: 1 · by **doomboy536** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:35 am

Lord T wrote:While I'm not a fan of Minicons (so sue me ) it is a very clever idea that I don't wanna see go away. Keep it going!

I'll do better than sue you!

*slaps Lord T*

Let me know when this gimmick gets old

by **MegaDave** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:39 am

thank for the support guys knew i could count on you fine members of the british empire.
~Dave salutes the good ship ODB with patroic zeal!~

News Credits: 2 · by **Insurgent** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:57 am

Never knew about the thread, but will definatly keep checking it out now I know.

Wait for it....

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:09 am

Insurgent wrote:Never knew about the thread, but will definatly keep checking it out now I know.

Wait for it....

*Slaps Insurgent for waiting*

I'm no minicon fan, but I'll keep it on page for ya!

No new news. Just reaaaally stuck on a chemistry paper for tomorrow

News Credits: 4 · by **jazzrules** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:21 am

The Master Blaster wrote:No new news. Just reaaaally stuck on a chemistry paper for tomorrow

I know the feeling, except it happened to me and was geography not chemistry. What is it you have to do - I did A-Level chemistry :-?

by **brodyimus prime** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:43 am

my woolworths just stocked a few movie toys high score, armor hide and elita one any of these i should pick up i like the look of armor hide and high score does anyone think they are any good?

News Credits: 1 · by **doomboy536** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:46 am

The Master Blaster wrote:No new news. Just reaaaally stuck on a chemistry paper for tomorrow

You can do it man, just don't get distracted too much by HMW

One bit of TF news - my Battletrap was dispatched today so I should be recieving it tomorrow! w00t

Brodyimus prime, I don't know anything about those toys but I'm sure someone else here can help you out

News Credits: 4 · by **jazzrules** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:50 am

brodyimus prime wrote:my woolworths just stocked a few movie toys high score, armor hide and elita one any of these i should pick up i like the look of armor hide and high score does anyone think they are any good?

You should definitely pick up Armorhide - he is mint. Elita 1 I'm not so keen on - when I bought her I thought it looked like a good mould but, oddly enough, I'm disappointed by the hands. As for the real gear, I don't know - they're not my sort of thing.

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:10 pm

^ As above.

It's a Kp question. I could never figure out the ratios for it.

I'll pop it up in a few minutes, see what you think.

Plus, I need to read up on my mechanisms again. I keep forgetting some of them

How's this for annoying? Because I had chemistry this morning, I missed out on three hourse of Halo, a jamming session with some other guitarists, and a mate was gonna show us how to grow weed (not that I would ever, but it'd be an interesting thing to know :lol:

)

by **brodyimus prime** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:14 pm

weed growing what would optimus say about that then? :MAD:

News Credits: 7 · by **Optimus Frimal** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:08 pm

brodyimus prime wrote:weed growing what would optimus say about that then?

Now, I'm sure this is a huge misunderstanding, I'm sure that what MB meant was that he was going to be shown how to grow dandelions and daisies

Isn't that right MB :grin:

News Credits: 4 · by **jazzrules** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:09 pm

The Master Blaster wrote:It's a Kp question. I could never figure out the ratios for it.

I'll pop it up in a few minutes, see what you think.

Cool, although you may have to remind me what Kp is :oops:

(I have an inclining its to do with waves)

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:23 pm

The partial pressures of reactants and products at equilibrium.

No joke matey. He's a funny guy, that mate o mine. He campaigns for weed's legalisation, I grows his own from a seed he bought on ebay.

But I live in the countryside. Another mate owns a farm, and the fields had shrooms growing in them in September :lol:

News Credits: 4 · by **jazzrules** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 pm

The Master Blaster wrote:The partial pressures of reactants and products at equilibrium.

Right, I thought it had something to do with pressure to begin with, stupid internet misleading me while trying to refresh my memory :-x

So MB, fire away

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:40 pm

A vessel containing 1.0 mol of methane and 2.0 mol of steam was heated to a temperature, T, and left until the reaction shown below had come to equilibrium.

CH4 + 2 H2O <=> CO2 + 4 H2

The total pressure in the vessel was then found to be 3000 kPa and analysis of the equilibrium mixture indicated that 0.2 mol of carbon dioxide had been formed.

Calculate the mols of CH4, H2O and H2 in the equilibrium mixture.

News Credits: 7 · by **Optimus Frimal** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:04 pm

The Master Blaster wrote:A vessel containing 1.0 mol of methane and 2.0 mol of steam was heated to a temperature, T, and left until the reaction shown below had come to equilibrium.

CH4 + 2 H2O <=> CO2 + 4 H2

The total pressure in the vessel was then found to be 3000 kPa and analysis of the equilibrium mixture indicated that 0.2 mol of carbon dioxide had been formed.

Calculate the mols of CH4, H2O and H2 in the equilibrium mixture.

News Credits: 6 · by **City Commander** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:06 pm

Optimus Frimal wrote:
The Master Blaster wrote:A vessel containing 1.0 mol of methane and 2.0 mol of steam was heated to a temperature, T, and left until the reaction shown below had come to equilibrium.

CH4 + 2 H2O <=> CO2 + 4 H2

The total pressure in the vessel was then found to be 3000 kPa and analysis of the equilibrium mixture indicated that 0.2 mol of carbon dioxide had been formed.

Calculate the mols of CH4, H2O and H2 in the equilibrium mixture.