The Energon Pub

News Credits: 217 · by **Diem** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:48 am

Aw, he's cute. Approved.

News Credits: 12 · by **GuyIncognito** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:49 am

Tripredacus agent wrote:I think it's important to remember that transformers is fiction and shouldn't be constrained by making the bots look more alien for the sake of "realism", just make them look cool, it worked for them for 25 years so why mess with the formula now. Besides if they reformat their alt mode to fit in with the indigenous species why not their bot mode?

I would argue that it also shouldn't be constrained by the idea that they need to make everything look like it did in 1984. Why can't the fiction evolve?

And if they want their bot mode to fit in on Earth, it would make more sense to look like an industrial robot rather than something with arms and legs and a face.

News Credits: 1 · by **T-Macksimus** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:47 pm

Wow. There are actually a few like minded individuals out there. I was just gearing up to jump ship and finish out my days over at TFW2005 since I was getting pretty sick and tired of running around here with a bullseye on my chest just cause I've got the balls to speak my mind and challenge other peoples way of thinking instead of putting up with the same old stagnant crap.

But before you folks start reloading, and I know you are just because I purposefully kicked the hornets nest again, all I ask is that someone please get the facts straight. That is NOT a Boeing Plane or Shuttle and no, I'm not going to tell you what it really is or give the link to the real jet with the real shuttle on it. I have been trying for too damn long to rock the boat of complacency and I'm just too tired so instead, I'm just going to go away for awhile.
It was refreshing to see some newcomers thinking the way I do. I leave the challenge to you guys. Maybe united you may stand a chance but I'll tell you right now, there are folks here that f*****g hate the way I think and approach stuff so you have your work cut out for you. Warbreaker, PM me if they get...unruly. :twisted:

News Credits: 1 · by **Agent 007** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:58 pm

look I don't have a prob with different opinions but I do have a prob with people who bash the movie in every thread and act so melodramatic; acting like it's the worst thing to happen to tfs. It's different deal with it

by **Warbreaker** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:45 pm

T-Macksimus wrote:Warbreaker, PM me if they get...unruly.

Yes, sir!

http://www.youtube.com/user/Slayershoop · by **Slayershoop** » Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 pm

T-Macksimus wrote:Wow. There are actually a few like minded individuals out there. I was just gearing up to jump ship and finish out my days over at TFW2005 since I was getting pretty sick and tired of running around here with a bullseye on my chest just cause I've got the balls to speak my mind and challenge other peoples way of thinking instead of putting up with the same old stagnant crap.

But before you folks start reloading, and I know you are just because I purposefully kicked the hornets nest again, all I ask is that someone please get the facts straight. That is NOT a Boeing Plane or Shuttle and no, I'm not going to tell you what it really is or give the link to the real jet with the real shuttle on it. I have been trying for too damn long to rock the boat of complacency and I'm just too tired so instead, I'm just going to go away for awhile.
It was refreshing to see some newcomers thinking the way I do. I leave the challenge to you guys. Maybe united you may stand a chance but I'll tell you right now, there are folks here that f*****g hate the way I think and approach stuff so you have your work cut out for you. Warbreaker, PM me if they get...unruly.

Sad to see you go... I may not agree with you but hey, your points are valid, and it's always interesting to see someone who disagrees with me so I can find faults in my arguments... well anyway, good luck with whatever.