Dead Metal wrote:Wat you'r doing, youst brings shame upon you'r ancestors, do you think they wanted that to happen? Do you think they were praude for the things they did? do you realy think so? I detest war just as my grandfather, everybody who glorifies war and and want's to recreate it for fun disgusts me.
I hardly think that re-enactment brings shame upon my ancestors. My Grandad saw action in Palestine in 1946-7, and my Sienar was in the Merchant Navy and had three ships sunk under him on the Atlantic Convoys. My great-grandad was captured at the Somme and later gassed, and like most Britons I'm fairly sure I've got quite a lengthy military history. However, the wishes of soldiers tend to run along the lines of "Christ, I hope this doesn't happen again" - and re-enactment certainly isn't the same thing. For one, if it was, we'd use live rounds and shoot people for real.
I, too, detest war - yes, despite wanting to go to Iraq, that's for another thread if you don't mind - and have protested against them since I was a wee mite. Re-enactment is not war. War is bloody, unreasonable, vast, painful, destructive, smelly, and horrific. Re-enactment is done for fun and relaxation, by and large by members of the working class, and you'd be hard pushed to find any who glorify the stuff that the people we recreate went through.
The Avatar of Man wrote:I'm not necessarily against war-- I would certainly take it over a violent, suppressive, stagnating peace, but I would say that, with such experience, to hate the things that usually come with war is quite reasonable. ... I believe that most like the idea of war as the embodiment of the ultimate challenge-- the ultimate conflict-- which is merely something for man to overcome
The romanticisation of war as challenge, as the ultimate test of manhood and of a culture, is not a new idea and it is one of the reasons that many people continue to join the armed forces. War is never just, but sometimes necessary; and is always hideously violent by its very nature. Re-enactment is simply a method of trying to understand the way people who were involved lived and died - albeit with the knowledge that at 5 o' clock when the public have gone home we can break out the beer and the raincoats and return to the 21st Century. To equate the two as Dead Metal has is to miss the point by a considerable distance.
The Avatar of Man wrote:An aside: it's interesting to see you back, KTB 9000-- not sure how to define that 'interesting', but conflict in itself is something mankind generally thrives upon, which you certainly provide. Welcome back.

I was wondering if anyone would remember me.