The Energon Pub

News Credits: 198 · by **DevastaTTor** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:48 pm

A new interview posted on MTV.com with former Transformers movie vixen Megan Fox reveals that while she think seeing the upcoming movie will be "weird", she plans on seeing Transformers 3 when it's released next summer. She also admits that she misses working with Shia LaBeouf.

MTV writes: The actress did admit that watching the battle of the 'bots continue on without her will be fairly odd. "I might be a little jealous when I see somebody kissing my Shia [LaBeouf], wearing my jeans that I ... already had been fit for," Fox conceded. "It's kind of weird, actually."

Transformers 3, the last of the Michael Bay trilogy, will be released July 1, 2011.

To read the entire story, click HERE.

News Credits: 8 · by **LiKwid** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:59 pm

LoL.."My jeans"..Yeah like Rosie is gonna fit in those..She's a toothpick

by **Sky-Quake** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:05 pm

well I myself have said some bad things about megan fox such as she can't act all her movies sucked she's a ditcher but rosie just doesn't look right and Megan Fox is a thousand times better looking how can Rosie beat this

News Credits: 1 · by **adamassc** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:19 pm

Sky-Quake wrote:well I myself have said some bad things about megan fox such as she can't act all her movies sucked she's a ditcher but rosie just doesn't look right and Megan Fox is a thousand times better looking how can Rosie beat this

Agent Provocateur "Love me Tender, OR ELSE!" On youtube is how Rosie can beat that.
(NSFW, that why no link)

by **Rated X** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:19 pm

"Like OH MY GOD I cant believe she stole my part !!!"

LMAO

News Credits: 10 · by **Lapse Of Reason** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:28 pm

Sky-Quake wrote:well I myself have said some bad things about megan fox such as she can't act all her movies sucked she's a ditcher but rosie just doesn't look right and Megan Fox is a thousand times better looking how can Rosie beat this

Looks like that photographer went over the top processing that photo through photoshop. She has freckles in real life. lol

News Credits: 2 · by **NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:51 pm

Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

However now that the mega starlet who so wisely trashed her public image with the stupidity that falls out of her mouth, and trashed her professional persona with the classic gems...Jennifer's Body and Hex...and either quit or was fired from the franchise that single handedly put her on the map has given her personal approval of the film.....all my fears have been set aside.

After all clearly she has great judgement.

News Credits: 1 · by **Searchlight** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:06 am

Sky-Quake wrote:well I myself have said some bad things about megan fox such as she can't act all her movies sucked she's a ditcher but rosie just doesn't look right and Megan Fox is a thousand times better looking how can Rosie beat this

LOL! That has been so badly air brushed it doesn't even look like her any more. Eye flipped for symmetry, complete removal of freckles, etc, and the jaw looks like it been squared off with an angle grinder.

News Credits: 11 · by **kirbenvost** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:48 am

Well, this makes me feel better about her as a person anyway. She may say a lot of things when she should probably keep her mouth shut, but at least this means she's not just a cold, heartless b**** because she actually misses it.

And yeah, she is way hotter than this Rosie chick.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:26 pm

NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

Are people really still bitching about this plot hole crap? Its bullcrap, you know what? I should stop, I should just quit life, cuz Im not getting anywhere but talking in circles. I need a nap.

Like GEEWUN on Facebook · by **GEEWUN** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:33 pm

Searchlight wrote:
Sky-Quake wrote:well I myself have said some bad things about megan fox such as she can't act all her movies sucked she's a ditcher but rosie just doesn't look right and Megan Fox is a thousand times better looking how can Rosie beat this

LOL! That has been so badly air brushed it doesn't even look like her any more. Eye flipped for symmetry, complete removal of freckles, etc, and the jaw looks like it been squared off with an angle grinder.

Agreed brother, I actually thought Meg's freckles were sorta attractive. That is really photosshopped it really isn't funny.

As for Sky-Quake I agree with you.

ROSIE OR ANY WOMAN ON THE PLANET CANNOT NOT COMPARE TO THE PHOTOSHOP!!!!
:twisted:

(boo yah)

News Credits: 2 · by **NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:34 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

Are people really still bitching about this plot hole crap? Its bullcrap, you know what? I should stop, I should just quit life, cuz Im not getting anywhere but talking in circles. I need a nap.

Worst part of it I actually like ROTF...but I am gonna admit it was needlessly long and needlessly confusing and as much as I do like ROTF, yes it had plot holes.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:13 pm

NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

Are people really still bitching about this plot hole crap? Its bullcrap, you know what? I should stop, I should just quit life, cuz Im not getting anywhere but talking in circles. I need a nap.

Worst part of it I actually like ROTF...but I am gonna admit it was needlessly long and needlessly confusing and as much as I do like ROTF, yes it had plot holes.

Can you please explain to me AGAIN what they are? Cuz I've been trying to figure this out since the movie came out.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:36 pm

Don't see what the big deal is about her coming out and saying she'll go and see it. I'd be suprised if she didn't.

It's the so-called "fans" that "hated" the first two movies that i'll laugh at when they eventually go and see it after spending years whining and crying about how bad the first two were.

News Credits: 2 · by **NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 1:11 am

SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

Are people really still bitching about this plot hole crap? Its bullcrap, you know what? I should stop, I should just quit life, cuz Im not getting anywhere but talking in circles. I need a nap.

Worst part of it I actually like ROTF...but I am gonna admit it was needlessly long and needlessly confusing and as much as I do like ROTF, yes it had plot holes.

Can you please explain to me AGAIN what they are? Cuz I've been trying to figure this out since the movie came out.

Wait what is that smell? Oh yeah its bait.

Clearly you want me to start pointing out the faults of ROTF which if you want to acknowledge them or not do exist.

I'm not saying I didn't enjoy the film for what it was because I actually am a supporter of the film, but I'm open enough that I can see there are things in ROTF that simply didn't make too much sense.

In that thought okay I'll take the bait. Like Constucticon being part of Devestator and running around in the battle seperately and yet Devestator is still combined, or all the Primes sacrificing themselves...and yet Optimus is a decendant of theirs. Hard to be a decendant when your distant relatives all died.

I could go on, but my point is despite these issues I can put them aside and enjoy the film.

And for the record pretty much ANY film has plot holes that make no sense if you look hard enough. The trick is to turn off my logic and just enjoy the film...which I did.

by **Prime Riblet** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:56 am

Agreed. There were definitely several plot holes. It is kind of difficult not to see them. With that said, I did still have a very good time watching the movie.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:01 am

NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

Are people really still bitching about this plot hole crap? Its bullcrap, you know what? I should stop, I should just quit life, cuz Im not getting anywhere but talking in circles. I need a nap.

Worst part of it I actually like ROTF...but I am gonna admit it was needlessly long and needlessly confusing and as much as I do like ROTF, yes it had plot holes.

Can you please explain to me AGAIN what they are? Cuz I've been trying to figure this out since the movie came out.

Wait what is that smell? Oh yeah its bait.

Clearly you want me to start pointing out the faults of ROTF which if you want to acknowledge them or not do exist.

I'm not saying I didn't enjoy the film for what it was because I actually am a supporter of the film, but I'm open enough that I can see there are things in ROTF that simply didn't make too much sense.

In that thought okay I'll take the bait. Like Constucticon being part of Devestator and running around in the battle seperately and yet Devestator is still combined, or all the Primes sacrificing themselves...and yet Optimus is a decendant of theirs. Hard to be a decendant when your distant relatives all died.

I could go on, but my point is despite these issues I can put them aside and enjoy the film.

And for the record pretty much ANY film has plot holes that make no sense if you look hard enough. The trick is to turn off my logic and just enjoy the film...which I did.

I'm not really baiting, Im just lost every time someone says it has many plotholes. I admit that Optimus decending from dead people is wierd, but maybe there more Primes. Dont forget the trilogy isnt over, it could be explained later. Thats how I look at it. But the Devistator thing, it was confirmed that Devistator and the Constructicons where seperate.

News Credits: 7 · by **Noideaforaname** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:59 am

NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Hard to be a decendant when your distant relatives all died.

I think this is a bit oddly worded. We're all here despite our great-great-great-great-etc. grandparents having long since passed.

by **Evil_the_Nub** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:55 pm

NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
NOBODY LOVES WHEELIE wrote:Oh well, with all the concerns I had coming out of the needlessly complicated and hole filled plot of Revenge of the Fallen, and now the replacement of a major character who's love interest was one of the major plot lines in both the first and second films I was worried this would be a giant Transforming Turd that had 100 explosions per second and 1000 confusing doubles of robot characters that you THINK are one character but are an entirely differant character.

Are people really still bitching about this plot hole crap? Its bullcrap, you know what? I should stop, I should just quit life, cuz Im not getting anywhere but talking in circles. I need a nap.

Worst part of it I actually like ROTF...but I am gonna admit it was needlessly long and needlessly confusing and as much as I do like ROTF, yes it had plot holes.

Can you please explain to me AGAIN what they are? Cuz I've been trying to figure this out since the movie came out.

Wait what is that smell? Oh yeah its bait.

Clearly you want me to start pointing out the faults of ROTF which if you want to acknowledge them or not do exist.

I'm not saying I didn't enjoy the film for what it was because I actually am a supporter of the film, but I'm open enough that I can see there are things in ROTF that simply didn't make too much sense.

In that thought okay I'll take the bait. Like Constucticon being part of Devestator and running around in the battle seperately and yet Devestator is still combined, or all the Primes sacrificing themselves...and yet Optimus is a decendant of theirs. Hard to be a decendant when your distant relatives all died.

I could go on, but my point is despite these issues I can put them aside and enjoy the film.

And for the record pretty much ANY film has plot holes that make no sense if you look hard enough. The trick is to turn off my logic and just enjoy the film...which I did.

I can't believe people are still confused about the Constructicon/Devastator thing. If they're in 2 places at the same time obviously they're not the same thing. Why is that hard to understand? Optimus being a descendant of the Primes is easy to explain. Obviously the chain of descent was started before they died. These aren't plot holes, they're things that should be obvious when you look at it. Or they're minor details that shouldn't have to be spelled out. But like you said, every movie has a few things that aren't explained or don't make sense. I'm just frustrated that everyone is acting like RotF is riddled with plot holes when it isn't

by **Sky-Quake** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:11 pm

okay etter picture this one doesn't look as photoshopped

News Credits: 1 · by **Elita One** » Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:40 pm

It's going to feel weird not seeing her in the TF universe but I'll have to get use to it.

by **Joker'sRequiem** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:52 am

Elita One wrote:It's going to feel weird not seeing her in the TF universe but I'll have to get use to it.

Agreed. I'm not that psyched when films shuffle their main cast, especially in this case where Sam and Mikaela JUST said "I love you" and saved the world. Again. I just hope they have a solid plot device to explain the new chick.

And who give's a crap if it's photoshopped? Honestly, that's just the way the entire industry is. Megan's pictures are no worse than any other model's.