Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:1: The only TF continuity is the fact that there is no TF continuity.
2: The fact that there is no continuity is a seperate continuity to the fact that there is no continuity.
3: Any expansion of a continuity (eg: Comics expanding on Movieverse) is a seperate continuity to the continuity it expands upon.
4: When a continuity is found, refer to rule 1.
5: The Time wars unite all continuities into one continuity, therefore as long as there are at least two seperate continuities in existence at any given time,then there has only ever been one continuity in existence at any given time.
6: When a continuity is not found, refer to rule 5.
7: Due to the fact that Hasbros' next continuity will be a seperate one to any and all others, all of the above are subject to change without notice.
8: Due to the fact that it is tradition for things TF to change without notice, rule 7 cannot and does not ever apply.
9: Nothing is canon until it is accepted as Canon by the Fanbase.Anything not cleared by the Fanbase is a plot hole waiting to be discussed in committee.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:Also note that an unknown Transformer beats up the Rover on Mars in TF1, so they're pretty much mobile in the rest of the Solar System by the year 2000-and-a-little-bit.. Perhaps it's specifically the Dark side of the Moon which has managed so far to conceal the Ark from Cybertronian searchers, if any?
#Sideways# wrote:Perhaps the Ark is what made the dark side of the Moon always concealed? Like the crash landing offset the rotation of the Moon, and thats why we only see the one side of it?
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:I defense of my non serious take on things:
The explanation of the Rotf Constructicons appearing in two sets is one example in recent history, and the flames on TF1 Optimus another, where it was not treated as canon, but a plothole, until the fanbase put the whole issue through the wringer at held up the final working result as to why..,
Since I watched people sort out the Constructicon debate without being a member, I consider the ninth valid in my overall Seibertron experience, and anyway it's meant to be a satirical look at the irony of TF reality,not the new world order, but I'm sure you know that.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:As for writers, the G1 writers decided that it's Canon for Hoist to fit inside Huffers cabin and drive him around, whilst all 5 Dinobots can fit inside Primes trailer and still keep it light enough for him to bring it around in a 180 degree skid and deploy them without toppling it or it getting stuck in the ground.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:Respectfully, I see that you get a headache as soon as you see the fanbase working together in the ninth rule, then declare yourself King of continuity. Did your headache pass now that you're the King? Shame on us if this degenerates into a flame battle about who makes the rules.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:
Maybe it's because it's 3AM, but I'm not really getting the whole "satire" of it. It's one thing to patch up a plot hole, it's another thing entirely to declare what is and is not canon. Come to think of it, I've never seen someone try to declare something canon or non-canon, and if they did, they were shot down hard.
Uh...what? I'm lost now. We were talking about continuity...now we're on the laws of physics being ignored?
"Fanbase working together." Ah, man, I'd like to see that. This fanbase can't agree on anything, we can't even agree on what color Frenzy and Rumble are, and there's a list explicitly telling us the answer.
(The headache was over trying to figure out those rules you made up, due to the fact that each rule contradicts at least two other rules)
Shadowman wrote:Autobot Smoketreader wrote:Also note that an unknown Transformer beats up the Rover on Mars in TF1, so they're pretty much mobile in the rest of the Solar System by the year 2000-and-a-little-bit.. Perhaps it's specifically the Dark side of the Moon which has managed so far to conceal the Ark from Cybertronian searchers, if any?
It was a Decepticon, one of the prequel comics establishes that it was Blackout, and they pretty much confirm that in the movie. (The the picture of the bot on mars and the picture of Blackout in Qatar have the same silhouette)
Red 50 wrote:And we don't actually know, whether it was an autobot or a decepticon. We only saw a silhouette.
Red 50 wrote:On your comment of the silhouette's resemblance I don't quite have an argument yet, but it's possible, that their exoskeletons have certain similarities in certain angles. And anyway, how did they get Blackout's silhouette, if they made a thermal shot in the middle of the night.(Though I don't how that works so...)
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
dirk2243 wrote:I remember the movie saying they were of the same exo-skeleton. And I'm assuming some of this could.... or "should" be explained in the movie. But based on things that happen in the movies that are left to be explained may mean it doesn't get explained. Like... why did they have to kill the "little one" in ROTF when Blackout, Brawl, and I'm assuming bonecrusher were all dumped in the same area? Plenty of parts just lying around if you ask me.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
dirk2243 wrote:I remember the movie saying they were of the same exo-skeleton. And I'm assuming some of this could.... or "should" be explained in the movie. But based on things that happen in the movies that are left to be explained may mean it doesn't get explained. Like... why did they have to kill the "little one" in ROTF when Blackout, Brawl, and I'm assuming bonecrusher were all dumped in the same area? Plenty of parts just lying around if you ask me.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:My guess is that they killed the little one for it's spark, since fan predictions before the film guessed Skorponok would dive down there and sacrifice his to revive Megz.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:so there's no movie confirmation that anyone except Megatron was actually down there.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:And even if the comics touch on the subject, I don't buy it as official. A movieverse label on a comic is just a gimmick to sell the Comic.
I strongly doubt people who write scripts without knowing the names of the Bots in them, especially when they killed them a script ago, will make phone calls to see who the comics killed off so they don't accidentally include them in the next script. (And even if they did make the call, I wouldn't expect them to actually get it right anyway).![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Autobot Smoketreader wrote:My guess is that they killed the little one for it's spark, since fan predictions before the film guessed Skorponok would dive down there and sacrifice his to revive Megz.
No, they needs "Parts" not "Sparks." If they implanted Ze Little One's spark into Megatron, they would not get Megatron, they would have Ze Little One in Megatron's body.
Which goes to prove: never make guesses based on fan predictions that turned out to be wrong.Autobot Smoketreader wrote:so there's no movie confirmation that anyone except Megatron was actually down there.
Except for the first movie saying that they dumped all the corpses down there.Autobot Smoketreader wrote:And even if the comics touch on the subject, I don't buy it as official. A movieverse label on a comic is just a gimmick to sell the Comic.
I strongly doubt people who write scripts without knowing the names of the Bots in them, especially when they killed them a script ago, will make phone calls to see who the comics killed off so they don't accidentally include them in the next script. (And even if they did make the call, I wouldn't expect them to actually get it right anyway).![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No other official source ever explained it, so what do you want? Roberto Orci wasn't even sure Blackout and Grindor were supposed to be the same bot. You have no idea how much stuff they leave out.
And the movieverse label is a gimmick to tell stories set in the movieverse that weren't told in the movies.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:They need Parts to repair the chest cavity, of course. How do they bring Megz back to life tho? They need to 'spark' his chamber once it's repaired, not load a new pilot into his body.
...none of what you just said made any sense in the context of Transformers. "Spark" is not a verb, for instance. If they needed new parts for Megatron's chest, they would have removes Ze Little One's Spark first, as seen when Jetfire gives up his body to Optimus.Autobot Smoketreader wrote:What do I want?I want to see people talk about where Jolt and Arcee could be, now that there is an Ark on the Moon and the plot is thickening.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Autobot Smoketreader wrote:
...none of what you just said made any sense in the context of Transformers. "Spark" is not a verb,
for instance. Sector 7 and NASA already knew about the crashed ship on the moon.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:I know I'm supposed to only host one thread at a time,
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:Dead TFs automatically magnetize to surrounding debris upon ressurection, as per Optimus with Jetfires remains?
Cyber Bishop wrote:Autobot Smoketreader wrote:Dead TFs automatically magnetize to surrounding debris upon ressurection, as per Optimus with Jetfires remains?
If I am not mistaken, this was due to Jolt and Ratchet..?
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Cyber Bishop wrote:Autobot Smoketreader wrote:I know I'm supposed to only host one thread at a time,
Uh... Care to show me where this rule is written down?
AlsoAutobot Smoketreader wrote:Dead TFs automatically magnetize to surrounding debris upon ressurection, as per Optimus with Jetfires remains?
If I am not mistaken, this was due to Jolt and Ratchet..?
Autobot Smoketreader wrote:Cyber Bishop wrote:Autobot Smoketreader wrote:I know I'm supposed to only host one thread at a time,
Uh... Care to show me where this rule is written down?
AlsoAutobot Smoketreader wrote:Dead TFs automatically magnetize to surrounding debris upon ressurection, as per Optimus with Jetfires remains?
If I am not mistaken, this was due to Jolt and Ratchet..?
Made a mistake, it was rule 3 for the collections forum. I took it as across the board.
Yes, it's due to Jolt and Ratchet. My bad. Meant to refer to what conditions we see the magnetization 'phenomenon' occur under.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MarvelMan87, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra