New IDW / BotCon 2016 Comic 'Dawn Of The Predacus' Teaser
Sunday, April 3rd, 2016 3:16PM CDT
Categories: Comic Book News, Event News, Collector's Club NewsPosted by: Va'al Views: 37,954
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
To find out more about the comic, why not check out the interview we did with JP here on Seibertron.com too?
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
56,797 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by Va'al on April 3rd, 2016 @ 4:08pm CDT
Posted by ZeroWolf on April 3rd, 2016 @ 4:22pm CDT
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on April 3rd, 2016 @ 4:24pm CDT
Dr Va'al wrote:And here's the question: do the images shown in that third panel hint at what the souvenirs might be..?
Not necessarily: Primal and Rhinox seem to be based on their Dawn of Future's Past bodies, heavily stylised. The exhausts on the sides of Rhinox' head (C-Landmine) and the wheels on Primal's arms (C-Crumplezone) have me thinking that.
If anything, the souvenirs may be based on FubPub's rendition of Transformers: The Movie... Shattered Glass style (Out of the One, Many...), with:
Checkpoint, the Guardian out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Prowl)
... and his huntsmen, The Autotroopers out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Inferno and SG Ratchet)
X-Brawn, the Champion out of Rook (formerly SG Brawn)
New or unused pretooled heads of course.
Posted by Va'al on April 3rd, 2016 @ 4:36pm CDT
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:And here's the question: do the images shown in that third panel hint at what the souvenirs might be..?
Not necessarily: Primal and Rhinox seem to be based on their Dawn of Future's Past bodies.
Ah, yes, of course! My bad.
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2016 @ 6:16pm CDT
But none of those match what we know about the souvenirs, especially that none of them are Shattered Glass characters.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:If anything, the souvenirs may be based on FubPub's rendition of Transformers: The Movie... Shattered Glass style (Out of the One, Many...), with:
Checkpoint, the Guardian out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Prowl)
... and his huntsmen, The Autotroopers out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Inferno and SG Ratchet)
X-Brawn, the Champion out of Rook (formerly SG Brawn)
New or unused pretooled heads of course.
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on April 3rd, 2016 @ 6:31pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:But none of those match what we know about the souvenirs, especially that none of them are Shattered Glass characters.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:If anything, the souvenirs may be based on FubPub's rendition of Transformers: The Movie... Shattered Glass style (Out of the One, Many...), with:
Checkpoint, the Guardian out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Prowl)
... and his huntsmen, The Autotroopers out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Inferno and SG Ratchet)
X-Brawn, the Champion out of Rook (formerly SG Brawn)
New or unused pretooled heads of course.
Well, their role in the whole seems to be as protagonists, considering a good SG Unicron created them. So they're no longer SG Autobots, so SG no longer applies to them, right? But that's a debate for a different thread.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on April 3rd, 2016 @ 6:43pm CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2016 @ 6:45pm CDT
We already know the factions and descriptions of most of the souvenirs and none of them fit those guys.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Sabrblade wrote:But none of those match what we know about the souvenirs, especially that none of them are Shattered Glass characters.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:If anything, the souvenirs may be based on FubPub's rendition of Transformers: The Movie... Shattered Glass style (Out of the One, Many...), with:
Checkpoint, the Guardian out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Prowl)
... and his huntsmen, The Autotroopers out of Trailbreaker (formerly SG Inferno and SG Ratchet)
X-Brawn, the Champion out of Rook (formerly SG Brawn)
New or unused pretooled heads of course.
Well, their role in the whole seems to be as protagonists, considering a good SG Unicron created them. So they're no longer SG Autobots, so SG no longer applies to them, right? But that's a debate for a different thread.
Souvenir centerpiece figure - TM3 Megatron
CW Legends Souvenir troop builder 3-pack - faction unknown but maybe Maximals (same CW Legends mold as the Golden Ticket figure, who is a non-BW character related to a familiar G1 character)
Non-CW Deluxe souvenir - A Maximal
CW Deluxe souvenir - most likely a Maximal
Other single souvenir - both mold and faction are unknown but it might also be a CW Deluxe Maximal.
And one of the latter three above features a headsculpt not found at U.S. retail (this is suspected to be the non-CW Deluxe souvenir). And an announcement mentioned there being CW Maximals for sale at BotCon, which is the source for the CW Deluxe souvenir, the unknown souvenir and the troop builder 3-pack possibly all being Maximals.
Posted by Deadput on April 3rd, 2016 @ 6:50pm CDT
If this takes place after the cartoon would he not be dead or is it just Prowl 2 from the Headmasters?
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2016 @ 6:58pm CDT
The Beast Wars cartoon is not solely tied to the G1 cartoon. It drew from multiple sources when it was made, treating the events of its history's Generation 1 as the stuff of legend and myth. All that happened in the G1 cartoon is not necessarily all that happened in the Beast Wars cartoon's version of G1.Deadput wrote:Whats with Prowl on the left there?
If this takes place after the cartoon would he not be dead or is it just Prowl 2 from the Headmasters?
Prowl's being alive here is not an inherent contradiction since we do not know if he ever died in the Beast Wars cartoon's version of G1. If he did, then he must have been resurrected as some point. If he didn't, then he's still alive. Or some dimension-hopping could have happened with this Prowl not being native to the BW cartoon's G1. Or some time travel could be at work with this Prowl being from another time when he was alive. There's several options here.
Posted by Nemesis Maximo on April 3rd, 2016 @ 7:15pm CDT
Posted by Emerje on April 3rd, 2016 @ 8:09pm CDT
Nemesis Maximo wrote:I was thinking the same thing, but then I remembered that the original Prowl, Ironhide and Silverbolt became the Maximal High Council and combine into Magnaboss.
Yeah, and two out of three are right there in the picture. It doesn't fit the ratios we were given, but repaints of CW Ironhide and Prowl in their Magnaboss colors could be interesting.
But more likely it's purely for the story since they were used pretty heavily in the club comics. Plus G1 Ironhide is right there fighting TM3 Megatron (who isn't looking so impressive, pretty small and weak looking).
Emerje
Posted by RevTibe on April 3rd, 2016 @ 10:51pm CDT
Maybe 5-bot Magnaboss would just feature two more '84/'85 'bots who die within the story? If it's bridging G1 and BW, there's room for G1 characters to bite the dust (would also explain why Silverbolt is slumming it with Prowl and Ironhide rather than forming Superion).
Posted by Railbomb on April 4th, 2016 @ 3:31pm CDT
RevTibe wrote:If a pre-Beast Magnaboss is in the story, I'd imagine it would just use the existing retail Ironhide, Prowl and Silverbolt. Doing repaints of those three wouldn't really fit what we know about the remaining exclusives.
Maybe 5-bot Magnaboss would just feature two more '84/'85 'bots who die within the story? If it's bridging G1 and BW, there's room for G1 characters to bite the dust (would also explain why Silverbolt is slumming it with Prowl and Ironhide rather than forming Superion).
I could see that happening. Hopefully we'll get an offical configuration for Magnaboss in the comic. It might just be the Optimus Maximus limbs on Silverbolt though.
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2016 @ 10:32pm CDT
Posted by Va'al on April 6th, 2016 @ 9:58pm CDT
(Spoiler free-ish)
Synopsis
In the last 48 hours of the Great War between Decepticons and Autobots, new measures are taken, paths chosen, fates decided, and acts of sacrifice kickstart a whole new saga...
Story
A comic which is clearly, undoubtedly, obviously, a pack-in story with a set of toys. A big toy advert. A narrative tying together toys that share a theme. Easy to get wrong. And yet, John-Paul Bove in his first official IDW Transformers writing gig, delivers a story that works on a number of levels.
Much as anticipated in the interview we conducted with him, the comic contains a very good balance of fictional universes, setting up threads between G1 and Beast Wars which we both know the developments of, and others that could still yield something very very different - time will tell if we'll get an exploration of the latter, I suppose.
What works particularly well is the blend of lighter-hearted humour to what is, effectively, a fairly dark chapter in the history of the two narratives, and the end of a war in general - once again as a testimony to the two universes, with the G1 gravitas (resulting silly at times) and the BW intentional silliness.
Art
Corin Howell fits this melange excellently, too, with artwork focusing on the fraught, tired, elated - and wonderfully skeptical and sarcastic - emotions that are running amok across the different factions, not just two as we might think. The simpler, cartoony style fits the tone set by the script, and still delivers some great pages with a grim undercurrent.
Both of which are undoubtedly helped by Bove returning in his role as colourist on the book, injecting his own authorial perspective of tonalities and emotive hues to the visual side of things, helped out by letterer Chris Mowry from the IDW stables. The lighting definitely heightens that contrast pointed out above, with contrasting, but not jarring, results.
Visual and verbal together, you might ask? Read some thoughts below, and make sure to look closer at the two covers available for the comic at the event, variant by Sara Pitre Durocher and string pulling, and 'regular' cover with all the souvenir characters by Robby Musso (both in thumbnail).
Thoughts
Spoilerish ahead
Having read this in-hand, on-site, as soon as I possibly could, I feel odd giving a review and a mark to the book but you know what? It's good, and not just as a 'let's featured all the new toys and some old ones and sorta mash them together' way. Compared to previous releases from the BotCon team, we are several notches higher here, even with the full reveal of the souvenir figures in its pages - and even the main cover.
That may very well be Bove's writing, and the control he has over the art with colouring Howell's work, but the synergy between the two is palpable, as the overall tone of the book is set well by mixing light and heavy, positives and negatives, humour and gravitas, past and future. If you get a chance to read the issue, please do. It's truly enjoyable.. in fact, it's just Prime.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on April 6th, 2016 @ 10:07pm CDT
Posted by Deadput on April 7th, 2016 @ 1:36am CDT
I won't say anything else but those who read it will know what I'm talking about.
Posted by Randomhero on April 7th, 2016 @ 6:18am CDT
Posted by Va'al on April 14th, 2016 @ 10:23am CDT
JP has some answers.
http://wordmongerer.tumblr.com/post/142 ... mers-story
Posted by Sabrblade on April 14th, 2016 @ 10:27am CDT
In response to this, I've gone and made corrections to some of the complaints that those "some people" were making, but a lot of their points are still pretty valid, as some of JP's arguments really do conflict with what was depicted in the BW cartoon.Dr Va'al wrote:*Some people* (Which I Kannot Identify) are being arses about the comic.
JP has some answers.
http://wordmongerer.tumblr.com/post/142 ... mers-story
Posted by Va'al on April 14th, 2016 @ 10:42am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:In response to this, I've gone and made corrections to some of the complaints that those "some people" were making, but a lot of their points are still pretty valid, as some of JP's arguments really do conflict with what was depicted in the BW cartoon.Dr Va'al wrote:*Some people* (Which I Kannot Identify) are being arses about the comic.
JP has some answers.
http://wordmongerer.tumblr.com/post/142 ... mers-story
Valid point does not warrant being an arse about it, though.
Posted by ZeroWolf on April 14th, 2016 @ 10:47am CDT
Posted by Va'al on April 14th, 2016 @ 11:03am CDT
ZeroWolf wrote:"Some people"? Am I missing something here?
Some of the TFWiki editors/contributors were pretty mean about the write-up.
Posted by ZeroWolf on April 14th, 2016 @ 12:55pm CDT
Dr Va'al wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:"Some people"? Am I missing something here?
Some of the TFWiki editors/contributors were pretty mean about the write-up.
I see, just because they had issues with it? Doesn't seem very professional of them since they should be doing the wiki neutral
Posted by Counterpunch on April 14th, 2016 @ 1:05pm CDT
ZeroWolf wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:"Some people"? Am I missing something here?
Some of the TFWiki editors/contributors were pretty mean about the write-up.
I see, just because they had issues with it? Doesn't seem very professional of them since they should be doing the wiki neutral
Frankly, the people behind the wiki are not necessarily known for being professional. It's a clique. If you aren't on the inside, you essentially don't count.
That's not to say that it isn't a great source of information. It's just stereotypical caustic academic types.
Posted by RevTibe on April 14th, 2016 @ 6:09pm CDT
Eh, really? I do some editing on there occasionally, fix up typos, correct things, remove a bit of naff humor, make a few small articles etc. and I haven't encountered any such cliquishness (what a messy word) or causticity. Not familiar with the stereotypes, but experience in other communities tells me to never trust what one fansite says about another fansite.Counterpunch wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:"Some people"? Am I missing something here?
Some of the TFWiki editors/contributors were pretty mean about the write-up.
I see, just because they had issues with it? Doesn't seem very professional of them since they should be doing the wiki neutral
Frankly, the people behind the wiki are not necessarily known for being professional. It's a clique. If you aren't on the inside, you essentially don't count.
That's not to say that it isn't a great source of information. It's just stereotypical caustic academic types.
I haven't done anything with the Dawn of Predacus article (haven't had the chance to read the comic), but most of the complaints on that list seemed to revolve around a face-value reading of the comic, since a lot of the author's response focuses on the ideal interpretation of these points. This seems fair enough, since the meat of an article should usually focus on a literal reading of the work, avoiding excessive interpretation, but now the site does have a source of authorial intent when filling out the later subsections of the article.
Edit: (The "me-too!" mentality of a lot of social media can definitely lead to excesses in the wiki's irreverent tone, but these usually seem to be stomped out fairly quickly. I can't draw any concrete conclusions on Dawn of Predacus's article with the information I have available to me. Makes me wonder if this has been a problem with other pieces of low-distribution material.)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 14th, 2016 @ 10:33pm CDT
Some of this insight was even only provided by the script reading that took place at BotCon on Friday, and not everyone who attended BotCon (let alone everyone in this fandom) attended the script reading. And even those who did attend (myself included) found its story rather difficult to follow. It wasn't until Jesse Wittenrich graciously posted some clarifying info about it on another board yesterday (five days after the script reading took place) that some sense was made out of its story.
But even taking the script reading into account, my original point still stands that not everything JPB revealed about the comic's story in his response to the Wiki was evident in the comic on its own.
Posted by ScottyP on April 16th, 2016 @ 11:40am CDT
On comics in particular, trying very hard to get our own resources improved - was very close to completion before the site data problems last month :/
Posted by Sabrblade on April 16th, 2016 @ 11:54am CDT
It did stop. Last post was made days ago.ScottyP wrote:I've said it in other threads but I'd love it if we could stop talking/gossiping about TF Wiki so much.
Posted by Sabrblade on May 24th, 2016 @ 5:33pm CDT
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on May 24th, 2016 @ 5:34pm CDT