New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
Posted by Hotrod
Feb 26, 2007 at 5:42pm CST
12,828 views
View Discussion
Sign in
or
Join
to reply
More Bots. More News. More Awesome.
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Nemesis_Apoc
Feb 26, 2007
Why does he look like a Ninja Turtle?
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Kayevcee
Feb 26, 2007
'cos they're big this year? 
That is one heavily armed 'con. Nice to see you can fold those oversized cowcatchers (jeepcatchers?) on the front up on at least one version of the character. My mind boggles at the thought of the leader-class one.
-Nick
That is one heavily armed 'con. Nice to see you can fold those oversized cowcatchers (jeepcatchers?) on the front up on at least one version of the character. My mind boggles at the thought of the leader-class one.
-Nick
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by 1337W422102
Feb 26, 2007
Wrist-mounted Gatling gun? Badass.
Wrist-mounted Battle blades? Badass.
Upside-down Head? Failure.
Wrist-mounted Battle blades? Badass.
Upside-down Head? Failure.
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Skowl
Feb 26, 2007
He looks cute, but you can tell in the pics he isn't transformed correctly. He's missing the guns on his back, it helps make him look more "full".
Still, the FABs are cute, and I'll probably be picking up most of them, this guy for sure!
Still, the FABs are cute, and I'll probably be picking up most of them, this guy for sure!
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Liege Evilmus
Feb 26, 2007
The head looks like a muffin, but otherwise, that's pretty hardcore!
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by XeroSyphon
Feb 26, 2007
Now I know where I saw that tank design before! It was in XxX: State of the Union.
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by FracturedKoi
Feb 26, 2007
I still think that tank is a modified M1-A2 Abrams. Never seen an Abrams with such a, er, "rack" on top of it like that tho.
And it wasn't the optics that were ripped out here...it was the whole lower portion of his face! (what face...?)
Still tho...I like 'im!
And it wasn't the optics that were ripped out here...it was the whole lower portion of his face! (what face...?)
Still tho...I like 'im!
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by metalformer
Feb 26, 2007
Definitivelly worth buying. Items like this are the reason I am still a TransFan. ^^
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Charger426
Feb 26, 2007
Not bad, but that head made me think.."E.T. phone home."
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
I meant they used that very tank, with the 2 extra smaller cannons on the top in XxX: State of the Union.
Comment by XeroSyphon
Feb 26, 2007
FracturedKoi wrote:I still think that tank is a modified M1-A2 Abrams. Never seen an Abrams with such a, er, "rack" on top of it like that tho.
And it wasn't the optics that were ripped out here...it was the whole lower portion of his face! (what face...?)
Still tho...I like 'im!
I meant they used that very tank, with the 2 extra smaller cannons on the top in XxX: State of the Union.
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Ninja Sixshot
Feb 26, 2007
that thing is really ugly
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Are you saying muffins can't be hardcore? Thems fightin' words boy.
Comment by TheMuffin
Feb 26, 2007
Liege Evilmus wrote:The head looks like a muffin, but otherwise, that's pretty hardcore!
Are you saying muffins can't be hardcore? Thems fightin' words boy.
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Stormrider
Feb 27, 2007
This is the first Fast Action that I like. Too bad part of his turrent has to be removed.
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by Optimus_julio
Feb 27, 2007
it look like a toy's meal...
Re: New Pictures of Fast Action Battler Brawl
(view post)
Comment by City Commander
Feb 27, 2007
VVVVERY BAD!
