The 1:32 scaled cars are $9.99 while the 1:62 scaled cars are $7.99.
























JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:So relatively speaking:
1:24 is Alternator/Binaltech size
1:32 is Alternity/GT size
1:64 is Hot Wheels size?
hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
william-james88 wrote:hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
What does a ricer look mean?
Bronzewolf wrote:william-james88 wrote:hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
What does a ricer look mean?
A "Ricer" is an owner of an overly-modified cheap (normally an import) car. Think "Seventeen year old who wants to turn their beater into a Fast and Furious car". Lots of unnecessary wings, body kits and undercarriage lighting. Now this is not to say that all cars with wings/body kits/undercarriage lighting etc. are Ricers; Obviously when those mods are applied to a car that's of quality/actually meant to go fast, when the mods are applied correctly and fit the car (as most ricer mods are DIY jobs that look awful), and when they serve a genuine purpose other than to look cool, it's justified. From this "up for interpretation" definition comes our current debate. I can see where 'jam is coming from, but I just don't see (mainly Crosshairs and Bee) as looking Riced.
Don't talk to me about cars, man. I'll end up writing essays.