Some of the hollow bits might annoy fans but there is quite a bit more paint than people may have assumed.
You'll let us know what you think!
You do realize this is a cheap, simplified, relatively tiny $11 toy, right?Immortal Starscream wrote:oof. guess where going back to the tradition of hot rod toys being not stellar. well, at least we got one good one out of kingdom!
Indeed.ZeroWolf wrote:The hollow parts don't bother me, especially since the head won't be visible unless you're standing directly behind him and have the back part folded down.
What's wrong with showing the toy for what it is? If it bothers Hasbro, they should make better toys.SkyFire Prime wrote:Seibertron has been mean lately with headlines, instead of posting pictures of hot rod and including the hollow head, you front paged the hollow head.
Nice,
I'm sure Hasbro wants to give you the next exclusive.
Rodimus Prime wrote:What's wrong with showing the toy for what it is? If it bothers Hasbro, they should make better toys.SkyFire Prime wrote:Seibertron has been mean lately with headlines, instead of posting pictures of hot rod and including the hollow head, you front paged the hollow head.
Nice,
I'm sure Hasbro wants to give you the next exclusive.
The hollow head is part of the figure, yes.jtanimator wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:What's wrong with showing the toy for what it is? If it bothers Hasbro, they should make better toys.SkyFire Prime wrote:Seibertron has been mean lately with headlines, instead of posting pictures of hot rod and including the hollow head, you front paged the hollow head.
Nice,
I'm sure Hasbro wants to give you the next exclusive.
Showing a toy for what it is?
Even if that were the case, seeing it like that shouldn't be a deal-breaker to anyone, unless hollow heads are a feature one absolutely dislikes on a figure. And if that's the case, the rest of the figure could look like a masterpiece and that person should still pass on it, because of the hollow head.It is what you see, and nobody will display an $11 core figure from the back with the entire backpack unhinged and totally out of place. I don’t feel any need to defend hasbro, they’re just a company, but the frontline picture is weird and feels oddly subjective to someone who dislikes this figure and wants others to as well lol.
Might be down to feeling white looks better at this size? Idk.Gauntlet101010 wrote:The hollow head is creepy. And why no blue paint for the windows?
Rodimus Prime wrote:The hollow head is part of the figure, yes.jtanimator wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:What's wrong with showing the toy for what it is? If it bothers Hasbro, they should make better toys.SkyFire Prime wrote:Seibertron has been mean lately with headlines, instead of posting pictures of hot rod and including the hollow head, you front paged the hollow head.
Nice,
I'm sure Hasbro wants to give you the next exclusive.
Showing a toy for what it is?Even if that were the case, seeing it like that shouldn't be a deal-breaker to anyone, unless hollow heads are a feature one absolutely dislikes on a figure. And if that's the case, the rest of the figure could look like a masterpiece and that person should still pass on it, because of the hollow head.It is what you see, and nobody will display an $11 core figure from the back with the entire backpack unhinged and totally out of place. I don’t feel any need to defend hasbro, they’re just a company, but the frontline picture is weird and feels oddly subjective to someone who dislikes this figure and wants others to as well lol.
Point is, there's nothing wrong with showing the hollow head, or even highlighting it.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I think the article title should be corrected lolYou do realize this is a cheap, simplified, relatively tiny $11 toy, right?Immortal Starscream wrote:oof. guess where going back to the tradition of hot rod toys being not stellar. well, at least we got one good one out of kingdom!![]()
Rodimus Prime wrote:The hollow head is part of the figure, yes.jtanimator wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:What's wrong with showing the toy for what it is? If it bothers Hasbro, they should make better toys.SkyFire Prime wrote:Seibertron has been mean lately with headlines, instead of posting pictures of hot rod and including the hollow head, you front paged the hollow head.
Nice,
I'm sure Hasbro wants to give you the next exclusive.
Showing a toy for what it is?Even if that were the case, seeing it like that shouldn't be a deal-breaker to anyone, unless hollow heads are a feature one absolutely dislikes on a figure. And if that's the case, the rest of the figure could look like a masterpiece and that person should still pass on it, because of the hollow head.It is what you see, and nobody will display an $11 core figure from the back with the entire backpack unhinged and totally out of place. I don’t feel any need to defend hasbro, they’re just a company, but the frontline picture is weird and feels oddly subjective to someone who dislikes this figure and wants others to as well lol.
Point is, there's nothing wrong with showing the hollow head, or even highlighting it.
Emerje wrote:If you're fine with this then you'd have to also be fine with Hasbro if they started making Marvel or Star Wars figures with holes in their heads as well, right? Or maybe Hasbro should stop painting the back of figures, too, since nobody displays the back of figures, right?
Emerje
Emerje wrote:I'm sure a lot of people appreciate seeing this figure fully like this. If I wasn't being a completist with WFC I'd certainly have second thoughts about buying it. I'd expect this from Authentics or Cyber Battalion, not Generations. If the head being hollow doesn't bother you then why get so worked up over it being highlighted in the article?
If you're fine with this then you'd have to also be fine with Hasbro if they started making Marvel or Star Wars figures with holes in their heads as well, right? Or maybe Hasbro should stop painting the back of figures, too, since nobody displays the back of figures, right?
Emerje