Got a source on that? I've always used "legos" when referring to multiple Lego bricks. I wonder what Webster's has to say about it?1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!
1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!
- The LEGO brand name should always be written in capitals.
- The LEGO brand name must not be used generically - nor should it be used in the plural form or the possessive, e.g. "LEGO's".
- When the LEGO brand name is used as a noun, it must never stand alone. It must always be accompanied by another noun. For example, LEGO set, LEGO products, LEGO Company, LEGO play materials, LEGO bricks, LEGO universe, etc.
Radical Ninja wrote:1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!
Actually, this isn't true, although it is a popular misconception.
I refer you to LEGO's 2004 Company Profile:
http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/compprofileeng.pdf
On the last page (16) of the document, it states:- The LEGO brand name should always be written in capitals.
- The LEGO brand name must not be used generically - nor should it be used in the plural form or the possessive, e.g. "LEGO's".
- When the LEGO brand name is used as a noun, it must never stand alone. It must always be accompanied by another noun. For example, LEGO set, LEGO products, LEGO Company, LEGO play materials, LEGO bricks, LEGO universe, etc.
So technically, you can have neither a single LEGO nor multiple LEGO (or LEGOs). You can only have one LEGO brick or multiple LEGO bricks.
) I had that worked was the StarWars LEGO Technic Droideka, which had a lot of kibble and pales in comparison to this. Kudos to the Brickmasters!terc81 wrote:It's just... 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O
The closest transforming LEGO toy (in deference to the sub-thread on the proper use of the word LEGO
Makes me wonder what happened to the LEGO Escaflowne I also drooled over some time ago.
