JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Rated X wrote:Whats shady about exploiting a grey area ? Politicians do it for a living. As I stated earlier, its not illegal to own (or sell) a marlboor wheeljack in the US. Its only illegal to advertise and market it as a "childrens product" in the US because it promotes tobacco. (according to phill morris who wants his piece of the pie) So if you do away with the whole "advertising" aspect of selling the product, you can legally sell it to adults in the US. (With paypal account being proof of legal age) Its that simple. So yes all these smaller retailers that are following bbts/tf sources lead are truly spineless and stupid. Its their profit loss, not mine. I got my classics Exhaust already. I dont collect MP.
You forget, no matter how much you try and sugar-coat it, legally Masterpiece Exhaust falls in the "Toy" category, because Hasbro and TakaraTomy, down to their cores, are "Toys and Games" companies and rtegistered as such, end of story. No matter the audience (children vs. adults) or the intent (like collecting). There is a category for "Adult Collectible" I believe, but only for companies that produce those, and only those. Look at FunPub and how their boxes say "Adult Collectible" with an age to match.
You're right about it not being illegal to own him, but selling him in bulk as a registered store will get you in trouble. And don't even think changing a products' category will change that, in fact that would only add fraud to the offenses once investigations have been completed.
Could anyone with a Legal Degree (which means someone who actually studied law) come here and explain a thing or two?
I don't have a law degree but a lots on common sense. As you postulated, attempts to exploit the gray area will get you into deeper trouble for fraud etc. BUT, if you want to go by the letter of the law.......not advertising the product to minors. X mentioned something about PayPal. That outfit won't allow purchases of "adult" related products (at least on the surface

) I should..........know a bit of that cr@p. Anyway back to topic, I was once a member of a now defunct online retailer that was VERY strict with regards to such "adult" material. They strictly required members to reigster proof of their identity and the likes. Those measures imho were meant to ensure that proof of identity and not defraud.
X has a point on the "spinelessness" of the retailers. In a sense "the more trouble than its worth" mentality is running here but somewhere down the road, this might rear its ugly head again for Meister and Rijie.The result might deter Tomy from even issuing this guys.
I have a pragmmatic and legal approach to this sh*t piece.
Situation: Fenrir72 online store
Open an adults only section with the following requirements to access:
1.For American costumers Drivers' license scan and or copy of Credit card with the relevant numbers blacked out together with the user registering their actual/accurate bio data
2. Recent bank statements to indicate actual use of said card
3. Supposedly BBTS has secured credit lines so it's the risk of the buyer if they actually want to purchase the item if their info gets hacked.
4. The law should more or less see the efforts to stay true to the letter of the ruling to keep the retailers legally safe.