>
>
>

New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod

Posted by ZeroWolf Dec 6, 2020 at 12:49pm CST 26,237 views
Greetings Seibertronians! Fellow Seibertron user and YouTube toy reviewer, Chuckdawg1999, has let us know he's posted a new review! This time, he's turned his focus to one of the highly anticipated releases in the Studio Series line next year; Transformers: The Movie Voyager Class Hot Rod!

In his informative review Chuck even points out a flaw within Hot Rod's instructions, ensuring you don't have any problems when you get your hands on this figure!

We have embedded the review below for your convenience:

chuckdawg1999 wrote:If you're a fan of Hot Rod and/or The Transformers: The Movie, you need to have this figure. This is the best version of Hot Rod.



Hot Rod is among the first figures revealed to celebrate the 35th anniversary of the Transformers animated movie next year. Unlike previous assumptions, the Studio Series 86 figures are not a subline and will be in mixed waves along with figures from the live action movies.

What do you think of this Hot Rod? Are you planning to get him? Let us know in the Energon Pub and stay tuned to Seibertron for all the latest news and reviews!
Watch video

More Bots. More News. More Awesome.

Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Gauntlet101010 Dec 6, 2020
I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Sowndwave76 Dec 6, 2020
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.


I really don't understand that decision either... Although imo, the yellow in the knees is worse because it's seen in the robot mode.

Nice review, Chuck!

I haven't been this excited for figures in a long time... Since UW Computron & Abominus, MP Megatron has been about the most recent "peak" for me. And I really appreciate the ER seekers and a couple others from that line.
But Grimlock, Scourge, Hot Rod, and hopefully Slag have me feeling an anticipation and kid-like excitement I haven't felt in what seems like way longer than the 3+ years it's been. I suppose I can throw Galvatron into this mix (assuming he's good), and probably Cyclonus as well.
I'm glad I have MP Starscream on preorder; that's definitely something to look forward to.
But now I've started wondering what it will take in the future to match the figures from this SS86 line.
The bar of expectations has been substantially raised. Especially considering it won't be long before a little deluxe figure costs $25+.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Jelze Bunnycat Dec 6, 2020
Sowndwave76 wrote:
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.


I really don't understand that decision either... Although imo, the yellow in the knees is worse because it's seen in the robot mode.


"Improper" mold planning here, at least the parts gang-molded with the spoiler are small and mostly joints.

I still like my Classics molds, but... can I say that the SS looks too much like the cartoon for me?
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by ZeroWolf Dec 6, 2020
Too much like the cartoon? :-? Intriguing is it because you think the deco is bland or other reasons?
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by ZeldaTheSwordsman Dec 6, 2020
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.
The explanation for the use of yellow plastic for that hinge is the same as it usually is for odd color placements like that: Our old "friend" mold layout. Sometimes the sprue with the color that would blend runs out of room, so a part gets kicked to a different sprue.

I'm still really disappointed about the faux-parts chest. We've seen from Animated and Titans Return/Legends that Hot Rod's design can easily be done without resorting to that... :( I was super-hyped for him right up until I realized they'd phoned it in like that, and now I just don't know.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Sowndwave76 Dec 6, 2020
Jelze Bunnycat wrote:
Sowndwave76 wrote:
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.


I really don't understand that decision either... Although imo, the yellow in the knees is worse because it's seen in the robot mode.


"Improper" mold planning here, at least the parts gang-molded with the spoiler are small and mostly joints.

I still like my Classics molds, but... can I say that the SS looks too much like the cartoon for me?


Yeah the “mis-colored” parts aren’t really any big deal.
I also still really appreciate the Classics mold, & will never get rid of my Henkel Hot Rod!
Of course you can say that... It’s just an interesting opinion; is the Classics mold your ideal?
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Jelze Bunnycat Dec 6, 2020
ZeroWolf wrote:Too much like the cartoon? :-? Intriguing is it because you think the deco is bland or other reasons?


It's the figure itself, odd as it sounds. It simply looks too perfect.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by ZeldaTheSwordsman Dec 6, 2020
Jelze Bunnycat wrote:
ZeroWolf wrote:Too much like the cartoon? :-? Intriguing is it because you think the deco is bland or other reasons?


It's the figure itself, odd as it sounds. It simply looks too perfect.
Well, here's a mark against its appearance: It's not magenta. :P Does that bring it down enough to help?
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by chuckdawg1999 Dec 6, 2020
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.
The explanation for the use of yellow plastic for that hinge is the same as it usually is for odd color placements like that: Our old "friend" mold layout. Sometimes the sprue with the color that would blend runs out of room, so a part gets kicked to a different sprue.

I'm still really disappointed about the faux-parts chest. We've seen from Animated and Titans Return/Legends that Hot Rod's design can easily be done without resorting to that... :( I was super-hyped for him right up until I realized they'd phoned it in like that, and now I just don't know.


Animated is a different look that isn't meant to represent the G1 toy/design. TR/Legends has two different chest transformations that will give you a solid torso, or the chest you want with gaps in the torso. I think MP-09 was the only one to be able to pull off a proper hood/chest transformation.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by -Kanrabat- Dec 6, 2020
Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Rodimus Prime Dec 6, 2020
-Kanrabat- wrote:Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
He was in the movie, in a short but important role. He should get a figure.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Jelze Bunnycat Dec 6, 2020
Rodimus Prime wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
He was in the movie, in a short but important role. He should get a figure.


And be big enough to house Titan Devastator!
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Jeddostotle7 Dec 6, 2020
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I have every official mold of G1 Hot Rod (that transforms) and am VERY excited to add this guy to my collection.

My only complaint is the baffling use of yellow plastic in car mode. Hopefully it's something reprolabels can fix. But it's not bad enough for me to take a pass on, that's for sure. But he looks incredible regardless.
The explanation for the use of yellow plastic for that hinge is the same as it usually is for odd color placements like that: Our old "friend" mold layout. Sometimes the sprue with the color that would blend runs out of room, so a part gets kicked to a different sprue.

I'm still really disappointed about the faux-parts chest. We've seen from Animated and Titans Return/Legends that Hot Rod's design can easily be done without resorting to that... :( I was super-hyped for him right up until I realized they'd phoned it in like that, and now I just don't know.

Neither of those examples prove that you can do specifically the cartoon-style transformation of his hood without faux parts, because neither of those are particularly styled like the cartoon version. As is, cartoon Hot Rod's actual hood in vehicle mode and chest hood in robot mode are genuinely different shapes (robot mode has an angled bend about half-way through that the vehicle mode's doesn't have, as well as different shaping to the edge), so it's kind of impossible to pull it off as accurate in both modes as this figure does without faux parts.

Rodimus Prime wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
He was in the movie, in a short but important role. He should get a figure.

Absolutely the most he might possibly get is a clean redeco of the Siege/Earthrise figure. There's no way they're doing a second brand new Leader-class design in 2 years for Astrotrain of all characters.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Sowndwave76 Dec 6, 2020
Jeddostotle7 wrote:Neither of those examples prove that you can do specifically the cartoon-style transformation of his hood without faux parts, because neither of those are particularly styled like the cartoon version. As is, cartoon Hot Rod's actual hood in vehicle mode and chest hood in robot mode are genuinely different shapes (robot mode has an angled bend about half-way through that the vehicle mode's doesn't have, as well as different shaping to the edge), so it's kind of impossible to pull it off as accurate in both modes as this figure does without faux parts.


This. This is pretty spot-on.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by -Kanrabat- Dec 6, 2020
Jeddostotle7 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
He was in the movie, in a short but important role. He should get a figure.

Absolutely the most he might possibly get is a clean redeco of the Siege/Earthrise figure. There's no way they're doing a second brand new Leader-class design in 2 years for Astrotrain of all characters.



Impossible for just a redeco in the SS line. It WILL be a new mold. Same thing for Arcee.
And as we all saw since years, the SS line is not and was never about rushing things. It may still be some years before we see a SS Astrotrain, Arcee, or even maybe Optimus and (gasp!) Megatron. But they WILL happen. And all in brand new molds.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Jeddostotle7 Dec 7, 2020
-Kanrabat- wrote:
Jeddostotle7 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
He was in the movie, in a short but important role. He should get a figure.

Absolutely the most he might possibly get is a clean redeco of the Siege/Earthrise figure. There's no way they're doing a second brand new Leader-class design in 2 years for Astrotrain of all characters.



Impossible for just a redeco in the SS line. It WILL be a new mold. Same thing for Arcee.
And as we all saw since years, the SS line is not and was never about rushing things. It may still be some years before we see a SS Astrotrain, Arcee, or even maybe Optimus and (gasp!) Megatron. But they WILL happen. And all in brand new molds.

I think a lot of y'all are SERIOUSLY overestimating the breadth Studio Series 86 will have. It's only supposed to essentially be overflow to make the 86 Movie characters they wanted to make for the 35th Anniversary of the Movie, while making room for Beast Wars characters (for its 25th Anniversary) in Kingdom, while padding Studio Series out until the next movie comes. The fact they're repacking Earthrise Arcee, Wheeljack, and Optimus in Kingdom the same time they're starting Studio Series 86, and releasing other 86 Movie characters in Kingdom, should tell you they feel those molds are probably good enough to represent those versions of the characters at those price points for now.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by ZeldaTheSwordsman Dec 7, 2020
Kanrabat, if we ever get another rehash of Astrotrain it'll be in whatever the regular Generations line is at the time. And I mean, looking at Hot Rod... I wouldn't bank on a mold made for Studio Series giving you any improvement but the non-C.O.M.B.A.T. feet.

chuckdawg1999 wrote:Animated is a different look that isn't meant to represent the G1 toy/design.
Mm.. The look, no. But as for the design, his transformation layout owes a lot to G1 Hot Rod: The hood becomes the chest while the sides of the car become his arms, with the park lights ending up in his shoulders. And he has the engine flip away to reveal a chest panel, proving that that's not a valid reason for faux-parts. That's the main reason I brought him up, really.

chuckdawg1999 wrote:TR/Legends has two different chest transformations that will give you a solid torso, or the chest you want with gaps in the torso. I think MP-09 was the only one to be able to pull off a proper hood/chest transformation.
The ideal is a hybridization of the two flavors of the chest transformation: The solid sides and tabs - and, if necessary, an altered version of the bumper tuck - of the TR version, combined with the no-cutout front and flip-away engine of the Legends version. Boom, perfectly good Hot Rod chest.

Jeddostotle7 wrote:Neither of those examples prove that you can do specifically the cartoon-style transformation of his hood without faux parts, because neither of those are particularly styled like the cartoon version.
Animated Rodimus may not be styled like the cartoon version, no, but he's still strongly influenced by G1 Hot Rod's cartoon parts layout. Including hiding the engine, which was why I brought him up.

TR/Legends Roddy meanwhile is heavily designed to resemble the cartoon - that's why the canopy is hidden away in robot mode, that's why the rear wheels fold behind the legs to give a clean appearance, that's why he has 3 pipes to a side instead of the Classics version's two, that's why he has the cuffs, why the hood forms his chest just like in the cartoon and original toy, and why on the Legends version the exposed engine block flips around to be replaced by his chest panel. If he's not designed or styled like the cartoon version, then neither is the Classics Seeker mold.

Jeddostotle7 wrote:As is, cartoon Hot Rod's actual hood in vehicle mode and chest hood in robot mode are genuinely different shapes (robot mode has an angled bend about half-way through that the vehicle mode's doesn't have, as well as different shaping to the edge), so it's kind of impossible to pull it off as accurate in both modes as this figure does without faux parts.
"The animation model doesn't draw the part consistently between modes" is not generally a good reason for using faux-parts - it falls under what I call "Cartoon accuracy to the point of stupidity". In cases like that, the designers should call the animation on its sheer nonsense and just use the actual part for the job it's obviously supposed to do rather than sacrifice the transformation quality for a questionable visual gain.
The angled bend in robot mode is nothing but a warped version of the hood's curvature in altmode, and can be safely discarded in favor just using the actual, curved hood. The pointed edge in altmode can be likewise thrown out or it can be accommodated by tucking the pointy part in (via the same mechanism as Titans Return, just cut differently). Ta-da! Hot Rod chest that looks plenty like the cartoon, without the transformation unnecessarily jumping through hoops or using faux-parts.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by ZeroWolf Dec 7, 2020
Jeddostotle7 wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:
Jeddostotle7 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:Siege/Earthrise Astrotrain is a nice toy, but it's severily undermined by the line's gimmicks.

So any chances of a new Leader '86 Astrotrain that is a proper "mini MP" with no superflous extra bits for the SS line?
He was in the movie, in a short but important role. He should get a figure.

Absolutely the most he might possibly get is a clean redeco of the Siege/Earthrise figure. There's no way they're doing a second brand new Leader-class design in 2 years for Astrotrain of all characters.



Impossible for just a redeco in the SS line. It WILL be a new mold. Same thing for Arcee.
And as we all saw since years, the SS line is not and was never about rushing things. It may still be some years before we see a SS Astrotrain, Arcee, or even maybe Optimus and (gasp!) Megatron. But they WILL happen. And all in brand new molds.

I think a lot of y'all are SERIOUSLY overestimating the breadth Studio Series 86 will have. It's only supposed to essentially be overflow to make the 86 Movie characters they wanted to make for the 35th Anniversary of the Movie, while making room for Beast Wars characters (for its 25th Anniversary) in Kingdom, while padding Studio Series out until the next movie comes. The fact they're repacking Earthrise Arcee, Wheeljack, and Optimus in Kingdom the same time they're starting Studio Series 86, and releasing other 86 Movie characters in Kingdom, should tell you they feel those molds are probably good enough to represent those versions of the characters at those price points for now.

Very well put, I feel they've reached the apex of what can be done with g1 prime for the moment, and megatron will be another tank if they do him again so don't be surprised if you never see him in the line. Same reason you won't see Cyclonus in Studio Series
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by Jeddostotle7 Dec 7, 2020
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Kanrabat, if we ever get another rehash of Astrotrain it'll be in whatever the regular Generations line is at the time. And I mean, looking at Hot Rod... I wouldn't bank on a mold made for Studio Series giving you any improvement but the non-C.O.M.B.A.T. feet.

chuckdawg1999 wrote:Animated is a different look that isn't meant to represent the G1 toy/design.
Mm.. The look, no. But as for the design, his transformation layout owes a lot to G1 Hot Rod: The hood becomes the chest while the sides of the car become his arms, with the park lights ending up in his shoulders. And he has the engine flip away to reveal a chest panel, proving that that's not a valid reason for faux-parts. That's the main reason I brought him up, really.

chuckdawg1999 wrote:TR/Legends has two different chest transformations that will give you a solid torso, or the chest you want with gaps in the torso. I think MP-09 was the only one to be able to pull off a proper hood/chest transformation.
The ideal is a hybridization of the two flavors of the chest transformation: The solid sides and tabs - and, if necessary, an altered version of the bumper tuck - of the TR version, combined with the no-cutout front and flip-away engine of the Legends version. Boom, perfectly good Hot Rod chest.

Jeddostotle7 wrote:Neither of those examples prove that you can do specifically the cartoon-style transformation of his hood without faux parts, because neither of those are particularly styled like the cartoon version.
Animated Rodimus may not be styled like the cartoon version, no, but he's still strongly influenced by G1 Hot Rod's cartoon parts layout. Including hiding the engine, which was why I brought him up.

TR/Legends Roddy meanwhile is heavily designed to resemble the cartoon - that's why the canopy is hidden away in robot mode, that's why the rear wheels fold behind the legs to give a clean appearance, that's why he has 3 pipes to a side instead of the Classics version's two, that's why he has the cuffs, why the hood forms his chest just like in the cartoon and original toy, and why on the Legends version the exposed engine block flips around to be replaced by his chest panel. If he's not designed or styled like the cartoon version, then neither is the Classics Seeker mold.

Jeddostotle7 wrote:As is, cartoon Hot Rod's actual hood in vehicle mode and chest hood in robot mode are genuinely different shapes (robot mode has an angled bend about half-way through that the vehicle mode's doesn't have, as well as different shaping to the edge), so it's kind of impossible to pull it off as accurate in both modes as this figure does without faux parts.
"The animation model doesn't draw the part consistently between modes" is not generally a good reason for using faux-parts - it falls under what I call "Cartoon accuracy to the point of stupidity". In cases like that, the designers should call the animation on its sheer nonsense and just use the actual part for the job it's obviously supposed to do rather than sacrifice the transformation quality for a questionable visual gain.
The angled bend in robot mode is nothing but a warped version of the hood's curvature in altmode, and can be safely discarded in favor just using the actual, curved hood. The pointed edge in altmode can be likewise thrown out or it can be accommodated by tucking the pointy part in (via the same mechanism as Titans Return, just cut differently). Ta-da! Hot Rod chest that looks plenty like the cartoon, without the transformation unnecessarily jumping through hoops or using faux-parts.

I'm just gonna say: I prefer how Studio Series 86 Hot Rod looks a lot more than any of the Masterpiece Hot Rods, or even just about any other Hot Rod/Rodimus figure ever, including the TR and Animated molds you mention, and a good part of that is the use of the faux part for the chest to actually get his chest looking the way it does in the cartoon. Hot Rod is one of those few characters where the cartoon-style warping is really, really, really important to the look of the robot mode IMO, and unless they can figure out a hood that can change shape to mimic both forms, I think the faux parts are just the better option; same situation as Optimus' abdominal section. Maybe I would be more mixed or negative on it if the use of the faux part resulted in an obvious hood backpack or something, but he also cleans up so nicely that it's hard to care in this instance.
Re: New Video Review of Transformers Studio Series 86 Voyager Class Hot Rod (view post)
Comment by -Kanrabat- Dec 7, 2020
I thing I learned with Transformers over the years is never say "never".
Just look through this TRHEAD. So many of these wishes have been granted! It may take years, but we never know.
Patreon
Charge Our Energon Reserves. Join the Seibertron Elite.
Support SEIBERTRON™