Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack

Thursday, July 26th, 2007 1:23PM CDT

Categories: Movie News, Toy News, Press Releases
Posted by: Skowl Views: 42,136

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

The official Transformers website has been updated with a preview of a 2-pack featuring the non-transformable, robot replica figures Optimus Prime and Megatron, both with exclusive "battle damaged" paint jobs. According to the official site, the 2-pack will be exclusive to Wal-Mart stores.

See the page here

And don't forget that you can get all the latest Transformers Movie news by checking out the Seibertron.com Transformers Movie Section, and all your toy news in the Seibertron.com Toy Section.

Credit(s): Transformers.com

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Recent Transformers News

New Galleries: Power of the Primes Prime Masters Vector Prime, Micronus and Liege Maximo

Posted 2 hours ago

Christmas in July- New Transformers Hallmark Keepsake Ornaments have been Released and Available

Posted 2 days ago

New Gallery: Robosaur Triceratops (aka KO G1 Dinobot Slag)

Posted 2 days ago

Twincast / Podcast Episode #379 "PUBG Crawl"

Posted 3 days ago

Transformers #22, GI Joe #9, Void Rivals, Spawn, Toxic Avenger + more in-stock at Seibertron Store

Posted 5 days ago

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245004)
Posted by Agent 007 on July 26th, 2007 @ 1:41pm CDT

not bad but I'll pass

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245012)
Posted by xxaMaxx on July 26th, 2007 @ 1:45pm CDT

I find it irritating when "official" images are small and low quality.

I'm intrigued by this line, though. Haven't seen any in stores yet, so I'm not completely sure what I think.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245038)
Posted by Lefthand convoy on July 26th, 2007 @ 2:01pm CDT

personally, i don't like it.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245078)
Posted by 1337W422102 on July 26th, 2007 @ 2:38pm CDT

Looks lame. Maybe if there was an AllSpark cube that came in the box, it would be SLIGHTLY more appealing.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245148)
Posted by Fortress_Maximus on July 26th, 2007 @ 3:19pm CDT

Ditto on passing and the crappy official pics being so pitifully small and low quality.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245210)
Posted by Unicron's Head on July 26th, 2007 @ 3:54pm CDT

Does anybody like these replica molds? You think with cutting out the need to transform they'd do a much much better job of making these things look sharp. I was expecting something a lot better, instead we get what looks like flea market knock offs or something. Cripes, why not just re-release the action master line.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245254)
Posted by Megatron Wolf on July 26th, 2007 @ 4:19pm CDT

If the price is right ill get it. I may keep it mint.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245265)
Posted by blkbitcloud1 on July 26th, 2007 @ 4:25pm CDT

Megatron_Wolf wrote:If the price is right ill get it. I may keep it mint.

If you seen them you wounld say that!..there're butt ugly...only Barricade looks good. There're 9.96 at Walmart and the 2 pack probly be 12-14.99

blkbitcloud1

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245296)
Posted by First-Aid on July 26th, 2007 @ 4:36pm CDT

Fortress_Maximus wrote:Ditto on passing and the crappy official pics being so pitifully small and low quality.

I heard Hasbro had a bad second quarter because of one-time costs, but doing the "official pictures" with a 1.3 Meg camera phone is being waaaaaayyy too cheap... :BOOM:

w00t! 500th post! :DANCE:

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245355)
Posted by Senor Hugo on July 26th, 2007 @ 5:12pm CDT

So, I'm right in thinking these are Action Masters of 2007?

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245410)
Posted by Liege Evilmus on July 26th, 2007 @ 5:49pm CDT

I can see how people would like the replicas, and they have great weapons, but I personanly don't like them.

As for these two, the Battle Scared Gundams beat these hands down!

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245430)
Posted by Robinson on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:02pm CDT

I saw these today at the Comic-con, I don't thonk they look too bad

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245441)
Posted by Dispensor on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:07pm CDT

Prime doesn't look half bad, but I'll pass.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245449)
Posted by Chaoslock on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:12pm CDT

1. I hate non-transforming Transformers
2. I hate battle damages on Transformers

That's two facts against these pack for me.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245461)
Posted by SnipeShade on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:18pm CDT

how big are they? They look no bigger than the BK toys... They look like Titanium TF toys...

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245466)
Posted by i_amtrunks on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:20pm CDT

meh.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245476)
Posted by Dispensor on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:29pm CDT

SnipeShade wrote:how big are they? They look no bigger than the BK toys... They look like Titanium TF toys...

If that were the case, they would be far more impressive.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245491)
Posted by Robinson on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:37pm CDT

SavvasSavvinidis wrote:
SnipeShade wrote:how big are they? They look no bigger than the BK toys... They look like Titanium TF toys...

If that were the case, they would be far more impressive.

Bigger than the bk and tit's about 4 inches or so

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245501)
Posted by Zeds on July 26th, 2007 @ 6:41pm CDT

Looks crappy but I may pick it up once I see it close up. Pics are too small as others have mentioned.

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245658)
Posted by First-Aid on July 26th, 2007 @ 7:58pm CDT

Robinson wrote:
SavvasSavvinidis wrote:
SnipeShade wrote:how big are they? They look no bigger than the BK toys... They look like Titanium TF toys...

If that were the case, they would be far more impressive.

Bigger than the bk and tit's about 4 inches or so

(biting fingers HARD to not make a joke about the Titanium abbreviation used...oh the heck with it)

4 inch tit's huh? Puberty just hit? :-P

(Ba-dum dum!)

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (245678)
Posted by DorkimusPrime on July 26th, 2007 @ 8:08pm CDT

First-Aid wrote:I heard Hasbro had a bad second quarter because of one-time costs, but doing the "official pictures" with a 1.3 Meg camera phone is being waaaaaayyy too cheap...

Not even that, a 1.3 megapixel camera means a resolution of 1280x1024. That's more like 200x150.

If it can't transform, it's not a replica. Besides, I think the "unleashed" look a ton better (not that I'd buy one of those either)

Re: Official Look at Robot Replicas "Battle Damaged" Prime vs. Megatron Wal-Mart Excl. 2-pack (248396)
Posted by DMSL on July 28th, 2007 @ 4:58am CDT

Man these look ugly as hell, how can they even consider calling them replicas?