>
shop.seibertron.com amazon.seibertron.com Facebook Twitter X YouTube Pinterest Instagram Myspace LinkedIn Patreon Podcast RSS
This page runs on affiliate links — your clicks may earn us a few Shanix. Want the full transmission? Roll out to our Affiliate Disclosure.

Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did."

Transformers News: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did."

Thursday, May 13th, 2010 2:48PM CDT

Category: Movie News
Posted by: Razorclaw0000   Views: 38,848

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

In an article over at the Associated Press, actor Shia LaBeouf discusses his disappointment with the second movie.

LaBeouf goes on to discuss why he believes the movie failed, and includes some comments regarding director Michael Bay's style:

Shia LaBeouf wrote:
Mike went so big that it became too big, and I think you lost the anchor of the movie.


With principal filming not even underway, will the criticisms of Transformers Revenge of the Fallen positively influence Transformers 3?

Seibertron.com: your number one source for all Transformers 3 news!
Credit(s): Gigazarak, AP

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074041)
Posted by LiKwid on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:02pm CDT
This is kind of old news..Everybody knew that the cast for the most part wasn't happy with how ROTF was recieved by the cirtitcs and fans alike. I think that with TF3 starting up , everybody is airing the dirty laundry . I remember megan Fox started this trend a few months back.. Nonetheless it's good to see actors standing up and voicing how they felt about the movie..

The more I watched the less I liked it.. I started to noticed things I didn't before ..
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074044)
Posted by GEEWUN on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:06pm CDT
Personally I feel the same way.....
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074046)
Posted by ConBotFormer on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:11pm CDT
well I sure as hell hope the third movie is the best. I like how Shia is very real about the film. It's his job and he takes it seriously. He know's that making movies isn't just shit you put together like ROTF.

The actors are told and payed to say their movie is awesome and everyone should go see it. I love that when a movie like ROTF sucks ass, the actors come out say it.

Don't kiss Bay's ass. He sucks at making movies.

Let's just hope this third movie is really good and it sounds like it's going to be serious. Killing humans, this should be a very good movie. A "real" war will happen now in the film if humans are being killed left and right.

Sounds very interesting, can't wait to hear more about this film. Hope it's a good one.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074049)
Posted by GEEWUN on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:20pm CDT
ConBotFormer wrote:well I sure as hell hope the third movie is the best. I like how Shia is very real about the film. It's his job and he takes it seriously. He know's that making movies isn't just shit you put together like ROTF.

The actors are told and payed to say their movie is awesome and everyone should go see it. I love that when a movie like ROTF sucks ass, the actors come out say it.

Don't kiss Bay's ass. He sucks at making movies.

Let's just hope this third movie is really good and it sounds like it's going to be serious. Killing humans, this should be a very good movie. A "real" war will happen now in the film if humans are being killed left and right. Sounds very interesting, can't wait to hear more about this film. Hope it's a good one.


Couldn't say it better myself :D :D
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074054)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:25pm CDT
Well, I can see why he didn't like it, but when you get down to it the movie wasn't that bad...
The parts I didn't like weren't that it was "too big"(Movie One felt bigger to me) but were stupid things like Leo and Alice...and the *shivers* dogs....
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074057)
Posted by sabrigami on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:31pm CDT
Hmmm, kinda worried after reading that. I thought the biggest complaint about these movies was the "human" element. Now they want to add more? Doesn't seem like a good plan to me. :-? I personally think it needs to spotlight the bots way more. I personally don't need more Leo, agent Sims and Mikaela stinking up these movies too. Oh well, least the explosions will be fun :KREMZEEK:
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074058)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:33pm CDT
Yeah, Leo(and Alice) are what ruined ROTF for me(luckily only watching the cool parts redeemed it).
MORE ROBOTS=BETTER....as long as they actually have personality...
I could deal with agent Simmons but Leo......his character doesn't really have any redeeming qualities, he's just so...lame...
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074061)
Posted by kirbenvost on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:43pm CDT
You know, I wasn't even really bothered by the overblown action, large cast of human characters, tiny robot roles, and butchering of TF lore and character alike... Heck, I LIKE most of the human characters, at least the Witwickys and Simmons... it was the stupid toilet-humor and annoying/racially stereotypical twins that really killed it.

Does Devastator need balls that dangle and clank together?

Does Sam's dog/Wheelie/everything else need to go around humping people's legs?

Does Sam's mom need to be high all the time?

Did the Twins need to be retarded caricatures of rap video stereotypes? Did the movie even need Jar-Jar-esque characters like them at all?

No.

I'm all for humor in the franchise, it was a big part of the charm of G1, and some of the later series, but this is not the right kind. TFTM was alright in that aspect, aside from the piss joke( :roll: ), but ROTF just took it way too far.

Smarten up, Michael Bay, stop acting like you're in middle school. Take a lesson from High Moon Studios.

I haven't even bought the DVD yet, because I have no huge desire to add it to my collection... that says something.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074063)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:46pm CDT
it was the stupid toilet-humor and annoying/racist twins that really killed it.

Toilet-Humor=Not funny, at all....my dad said Simmon's uh....you know, scarred his mind...

But seriously, where are people coming from with "racist twins?" It's driving me insane....I don't find them racist and neither does anyone I know...
I actually liked the Twins, the only way they ruined it was screentime stealing(and some of what they said to Leo).
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074064)
Posted by gigazarak on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:47pm CDT
sabrigami wrote:Hmmm, kinda worried after reading that. I thought the biggest complaint about these movies was the "human" element. Now they want to add more? Doesn't seem like a good plan to me. :-? I personally think it needs to spotlight the bots way more. I personally don't need more Leo, agent Sims and Mikaela stinking up these movies too. Oh well, least the explosions will be fun :KREMZEEK:


I'm with you 100%, but just think about this for a minute. If the previous films had 1 dimensional characters, how do you think they could spotlight one of the robots? Trust me, I'd love it if they did, but they can't even add any depth or interest into the humans let alone any of the robots, I think it's asking a bit much of the film-makers imho, which is a bit sad really.

So I guess this news from Shia is further indication that all the new actors signing up to this film are part of a new push in the TF film franchise, more humans, more characterization, which is exactly what Bays films are always panned for not having, so good on them for actually trying to make everybody happy, (but you know how THAT always works out!?)

But more humans is exactly what the fans complained about in the first film! Too many humans! But when they tried to focus on the robots (ROTF), by adding more and more, it made for a critical failure of a film (even though it did gangbusters in ticket sales). I can just hear the film-makers now .. "You people aren't happy either way are you!?"
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074065)
Posted by kirbenvost on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:49pm CDT
zenosaurus_x wrote:
it was the stupid toilet-humor and annoying/racist twins that really killed it.

Toilet-Humor=Not funny, at all....my dad said Simmon's uh....you know, scarred his mind...

But seriously, where are people coming from with "racist twins?" It's driving me insane....I don't find them racist and neither does anyone I know...
I actually liked the Twins, the only way they ruined it was screentime stealing(and some of what they said to Leo).


I didn't really word it properly... I've edited the post to reflect how I feel.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074068)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:51pm CDT
Ah ok, they just seemed more goofy to me...but still, my only complaint about them is their stealing of screentime, even from BumbleBee...
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074071)
Posted by kirbenvost on May 13th, 2010 @ 3:59pm CDT
zenosaurus_x wrote:Ah ok, they just seemed more goofy to me...but still, my only complaint about them is their stealing of screentime, even from BumbleBee...


Yeah, they were really goofy, but in a really annoying way. Characters like that should be kept to smaller roles. I guess they were trying to make it appealing to kids or something, but the problem with that is the rest of the humor in ROTF is so inappropriate for children.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074074)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 4:04pm CDT
Yeah, which is pretty stupid as there's a toy line based off of it....
How are you supposed to sell to people who shouldn't/can't see the movie?
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074075)
Posted by GEEWUN on May 13th, 2010 @ 4:09pm CDT
Image
"On the Run"
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074076)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 4:10pm CDT
Didn't you just steal the beginning from someone else?

Call me odd, but somehow that wasn't funny....
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074089)
Posted by DMSL on May 13th, 2010 @ 4:54pm CDT
Guess i am part of the minoriy here, but i really liked ROTF.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074094)
Posted by Evil_the_Nub on May 13th, 2010 @ 5:14pm CDT
DMSL wrote:Guess i am part of the minoriy here, but i really liked ROTF.

I really liked it too, I think people complain about it and trash it WAY too much. I don't think you're in the minority, it's just that the people who didn't like it are still hanging onto it. Hating Michael Bay has become a fad and I was sick of it 11 months ago when it started. People have been criticizing the movie for things every action movie does: defying the laws of physics, over-the-top effects, etc. The only complaint I find valid is the humor sucked. Even though the humping and wrecking balls didn't bother me, I'd like to see something better.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074095)
Posted by Mechas8n on May 13th, 2010 @ 5:14pm CDT
What they need to do is give the robots character

and here's an Idea. Go Bigger and lose the wanker. (You see what I did there)

Oh course Shia is going to say "What I think people want to see is the actor, there needs to be more of the actor in the next movie" He IS the actor in the next movie.

What Transformers need is Transformers otherwise it would be Shia La Boef and His Robot Friends: The Motion Picture and I don't think anyone wants to see that.

Less Fleshlings More Sci Fi.

Yer man there really does not get it, does he
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074096)
Posted by Cheetron on May 13th, 2010 @ 5:17pm CDT
When I saw the second movie, it blew the first one out of the water. I liked ROTF. I'm not ashamed to admit it. I did get very very sick of all the humans and their plot lines that really had no purpose.

Parents - Fine but phase them out fast.
Buddies - Fine but only if they are onscreen when in passing
Big name stars - Fine. Do like you did with the college professor.


i don't know. There's probably more but I am feeling sick from this cold.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074109)
Posted by Bouncy X on May 13th, 2010 @ 6:08pm CDT
the only thing that bugged me about Devastator's "balls" was their existance. none of the vehicles that formed him had a wrecking ball but yet he has not one but two? and we never see them before or after. i mean the twins, simmons and leo go right under him to stay safe and nobody noticed it then?

but its a scene that lasts maybe 5 seconds in a 2hour and 20min movie so yeah. lol

as for the "OMG THEY'RE SO RACIST" twins...i'd be willing to bet most people accusing them of that are white themselves (must be a white man guilt thing lol). the first movie established they learned english and the ways of earth from the internet so it makes sense that some of that saw all the "hip hop" stuff and took from that just like Jazz did in the first movie. plus, a black actor voiced one of the twins anyway so if he didnt see anything wrong then yeah.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074110)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on May 13th, 2010 @ 6:12pm CDT
Well, despite what I've said, I DID like ROTF alot....but the few parts I didn't like happened to be pretty awful parts...
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074112)
Posted by Solrac333 on May 13th, 2010 @ 6:18pm CDT
I loved this movie. I really do not see what the problem is. People expect some Oscar winning movie. It's Transformers. I got what I want out of it and was happy. Robots beating the hell out of other robots.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074121)
Posted by Diem on May 13th, 2010 @ 6:50pm CDT
I went to see the movie in a Japanese cinema with a bunch of non-transfan friends.

While I remained stony-faced throughout the various Leo/stoned mum/dog antics and physically winced at the leg-humping bit, people around me were laughing. Admittedly the Japanese sense of humour is often more slapstick than in the west but even my non-Japanese friends were laughing.

I hated those scenes and I personally wish they weren't there but Bay's not wrong in inserting such scenes if the general public loves them.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074126)
Posted by First-Aid on May 13th, 2010 @ 6:59pm CDT
One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074128)
Posted by sabrigami on May 13th, 2010 @ 7:07pm CDT
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.


I agree with you there. I guess when I read the interview it seemed to me they were just going to do the same human junk that they did in RotF (which kinda sucked imo). If they do it the way you're talking about though, it would be way better. I actually liked what they did in the first one, I thought it had a nice balance between humans and bots. I just thought they put way too much emphasis on the human junk in the second.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074151)
Posted by gigazarak on May 13th, 2010 @ 8:11pm CDT
The second movie was just a rushed-hack-job, nothing more. I'm sure it had it's good moments for some people, and some sucky moments for others. But there was hardly anything intentionally subtle or interesting in there, it was all on the surface, an attempt at entertainment, that raked in huge dollars, WIN. 'nuff said.

What we should all be sad about, is if the third movie follows the same rushed-hack-job template, then we are in for the serial whining on message boards until we all die. But I don't think they will make another ROTF, as Shia eludes, more humans etc (yeah who cares Shia, just flail your arms and scream in front of the camera some more). We know theres more actors in for this one, so theres hope for a "good" movie, (whatever that means). They might just downplay the robots, which for ME as a fan of the robots, is a sad thing :(
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074161)
Posted by Autobot032 on May 13th, 2010 @ 8:30pm CDT
Here's the problem: The movies were nothing like what we were promised.

The first movie was supposed to be about Sam and Bumblebee forging a friendship, and meeting the Autobots. Well, they dropped the ball there.

It could've been E.T. with an alien invasion story and it could've worked. It didn't because they did a hack job of writing it.

The second movie was more like G1. It even went with Prime dying, being the chosen one/religious figure. It was loud, it was brassy, and because of this, the critics didn't like it.

Yet, I found it to be thoroughly entertaining and well worth my money.

TF3 better be better than the first two, and it better be worth my money. If Shia can go around and trash talk the franchise that made him a star, he better bring his A game, and they better have a writer worth a damn.

Bay's not blameless, but he has only so much control past a certain point. The writers are just as much to blame, if not more. People seem to forget that.

Ridley Scott couldn't have directed it better, because the writing was soooo bad.

Blame the right PEOPLE, not a single person.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074177)
Posted by Evil_the_Nub on May 13th, 2010 @ 9:12pm CDT
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074191)
Posted by Vicalliose on May 13th, 2010 @ 9:49pm CDT
Razorclaw0000 wrote:With principal filming not even underway, will the criticisms of Transformers Revenge of the Fallen positively influence Transformers 3?

No.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074193)
Posted by gigazarak on May 13th, 2010 @ 9:51pm CDT
Evil_the_Nub wrote:
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.


Well First-Aid did say that...

First-Aid wrote:There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie.


Which is true I think.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074195)
Posted by gigazarak on May 13th, 2010 @ 9:57pm CDT
Vicalliose wrote:
Razorclaw0000 wrote:With principal filming not even underway, will the criticisms of Transformers Revenge of the Fallen positively influence Transformers 3?

No.

Well we're all two movies in now, and I think it's fair to be more than a little damning about the third film. Might be irritating and frustrating, but it's not without good cause!
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074197)
Posted by Autobot032 on May 13th, 2010 @ 10:09pm CDT
gigazarak wrote:
Evil_the_Nub wrote:
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.


Well First-Aid did say that...

First-Aid wrote:There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie.


Which is true I think.


I'm with Nub on this one. You don't get much more caught in the middle than having your family kidnapped by the villain(s), and having to be a hero not only for yourself, but your alien friends.

I'm...a little confused. Did anyone actually see the movie that Nub and I did? I mean, it was clearly TransFormers, and it clearly paid homage to G1 with some of the themes in it, and it had what everyone had asked for: More robots.

I still think people are expecting Oscar material out of this stuff. I think people are looking for Dreamwave level writing, where it's all "srsly" and so on. Well...here's a newsflash for you:

1.) Dreamwave was boring. It was downtrodden, too serious, and lacked any and all fun to be had.

2.) TransFormers started out as a hollow cartoon made as a commercial vehicle to sell TOYS. To children. Not Shakesperian drama to adults.

Revenge Of The Fallen WAS TransFormers. It WAS a lot of fun, it was loud, it was obnoxious and it sold toys, just like it's G1 counterpart.

Oh, I'm sure you could probably finagle an Oscar caliber level of writing out of the mythos (though I'm honestly not sure it's even remotely possible...), but would it be worth it? I don't think so. I'm betting it would be boring, it wouldn't make much money, and it would effectively kill the film franchise.

This is immature, puddle deep, explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN. That's how it's supposed to be. If you want deep, thought provoking science fiction, it exists. It just doesn't seem to in the world of TransFormers.

Once you realize that this is supposed to be all for FUN, not profit (except Hasbro's), not srs business, then perhaps you'll be able to fully enjoy it.

I don't mind the movies getting darker and more serious, within reason, but the awe and wow factor in the first movie where we first meet Optimus and company is what this franchise needs. It needs humor, it needs liveliness, it needs more fun.

We grew up, we didn't grow old. Don't make the franchise do the same.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074207)
Posted by gigazarak on May 13th, 2010 @ 10:51pm CDT
Autobot032 wrote:
gigazarak wrote:
Evil_the_Nub wrote:
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.


Well First-Aid did say that...

First-Aid wrote:There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie.


Which is true I think.


I'm with Nub on this one. You don't get much more caught in the middle than having your family kidnapped by the villain(s), and having to be a hero not only for yourself, but your alien friends.

I'm...a little confused. Did anyone actually see the movie that Nub and I did? I mean, it was clearly TransFormers, and it clearly paid homage to G1 with some of the themes in it, and it had what everyone had asked for: More robots.

I still think people are expecting Oscar material out of this stuff. I think people are looking for Dreamwave level writing, where it's all "srsly" and so on. Well...here's a newsflash for you:

1.) Dreamwave was boring. It was downtrodden, too serious, and lacked any and all fun to be had.


Who was it aimed at? Old fans of G1! Who weren't kids anymore! It's fair to make the comics a little more meaty in terms of themes than the cartoons, you found them boring? Well thats your opinion, and you have a right to it I suppose, more interesting comics for the rest of us...

Autobot032 wrote:
2.) TransFormers started out as a hollow cartoon made as a commercial vehicle to sell TOYS. To children. Not Shakesperian drama to adults.

Revenge Of The Fallen WAS TransFormers. It WAS a lot of fun, it was loud, it was obnoxious and it sold toys, just like it's G1 counterpart.


Sure it did sell toys, no doubting you there, but fun huh? Who's having fun!? Lets see what fun we have here...
    John Turturros ass
    Leg humping robot
    Racial stereotype borderline offensive Twins
    Farting robot
    Robot testicles
    Insult after insult to your intelligence..
    ... god do I need to mention any more!?

Are any of those things G1? it's things like these that bring the tone of the franchise down, to a level lower than just mere kids-fare entertainment, it just becomes depraved and self-indulgent. I took my kids to see the movie, all the borderline adult humour was a bit much for their tiny little minds, and while I'm no conservative nut-job, I did find it a bit much for them, (my kids are 3 and 6y/o btw which is roughly the age I was when tf first happened to me in 84)... So ROTF in my mind, changed the focus on who TF was aimed at, it's not little kids anymore, barely teenagers either! So what? TF has matured then? Hardly..

Autobot032 wrote:
Oh, I'm sure you could probably finagle an Oscar caliber level of writing out of the mythos (though I'm honestly not sure it's even remotely possible...), but would it be worth it? I don't think so. I'm betting it would be boring, it wouldn't make much money, and it would effectively kill the film franchise.


They could always reboot, nothing will kill a franchise like TF, you're kidding yourself if you think that something will. It's a long standing juggernaut of a toy-line, just think of how many toys you buy, and multiply that by a large percentage OF THE ENTIRE FRICKEN WORLD, it's not going away any time soon.

I don't think that those that decry ROTF as a POS, aren't doing so because they want Shakespeare, they just want a movie that doesn't add pointless juvenile garbage to a universe that is full of, as you say "explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN" opportunities!

Autobot032 wrote:
This is immature, puddle deep, explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN. That's how it's supposed to be. If you want deep, thought provoking science fiction, it exists. It just doesn't seem to in the world of TransFormers.

Once you realize that this is supposed to be all for FUN, not profit (except Hasbro's), not srs business, then perhaps you'll be able to fully enjoy it.


Yeah but what kind of fun!? Just because you find certain things fun, doesn't mean that everyone else does!

Autobot032 wrote:
I don't mind the movies getting darker and more serious, within reason, but the awe and wow factor in the first movie where we first meet Optimus and company is what this franchise needs. It needs humor, it needs liveliness, it needs more fun.

We grew up, we didn't grow old. Don't make the franchise do the same.


Woah! erm long post!...

Lets see Unicron and the Quintessons in the third film! Would make sense given that G1 Season 3 introduced the Quints, and Unicron happened before season 3, theres your "placating the G1 fans" covered! But Unicron will probably be a big farting ass or something, and the Quints, well maybe they'll become like hentacle porn monsters, Bah! who am I kidding!? That isn't adult, depraved, despicable, ugly and horrendous enough damnit! I simply can't wait for what they'll do next...
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074211)
Posted by Razorclaw0000 on May 13th, 2010 @ 11:12pm CDT
Vicalliose wrote:
Razorclaw0000 wrote:With principal filming not even underway, will the criticisms of Transformers Revenge of the Fallen positively influence Transformers 3?

No.


;-)
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074219)
Posted by Autobot032 on May 13th, 2010 @ 11:27pm CDT
gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
gigazarak wrote:
Evil_the_Nub wrote:
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.


Well First-Aid did say that...

First-Aid wrote:There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie.


Which is true I think.


I'm with Nub on this one. You don't get much more caught in the middle than having your family kidnapped by the villain(s), and having to be a hero not only for yourself, but your alien friends.

I'm...a little confused. Did anyone actually see the movie that Nub and I did? I mean, it was clearly TransFormers, and it clearly paid homage to G1 with some of the themes in it, and it had what everyone had asked for: More robots.

I still think people are expecting Oscar material out of this stuff. I think people are looking for Dreamwave level writing, where it's all "srsly" and so on. Well...here's a newsflash for you:

1.) Dreamwave was boring. It was downtrodden, too serious, and lacked any and all fun to be had.


Who was it aimed at? Old fans of G1! Who weren't kids anymore! It's fair to make the comics a little more meaty in terms of themes than the cartoons, you found them boring? Well thats your opinion, and you have a right to it I suppose, more interesting comics for the rest of us...


And more power to you. If you enjoy them, good for you.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
2.) TransFormers started out as a hollow cartoon made as a commercial vehicle to sell TOYS. To children. Not Shakesperian drama to adults.

Revenge Of The Fallen WAS TransFormers. It WAS a lot of fun, it was loud, it was obnoxious and it sold toys, just like it's G1 counterpart.


Sure it did sell toys, no doubting you there, but fun huh? Who's having fun!? Lets see what fun we have here...
    John Turturros ass
    Leg humping robot
    Racial stereotype borderline offensive Twins
    Farting robot
    Robot testicles
    Insult after insult to your intelligence..
    ... god do I need to mention any more!?

Are any of those things G1? it's things like these that bring the tone of the franchise down, to a level lower than just mere kids-fare entertainment, it just becomes depraved and self-indulgent. I took my kids to see the movie, all the borderline adult humour was a bit much for their tiny little minds, and while I'm no conservative nut-job, I did find it a bit much for them, (my kids are 3 and 6y/o btw which is roughly the age I was when tf first happened to me in 84)... So ROTF in my mind, changed the focus on who TF was aimed at, it's not little kids anymore, barely teenagers either! So what? TF has matured then? Hardly..


I'm with you on everything except the twins, and the farting robot.
The twins, while tasteless, were hardly offensive in comparison to some of Hollywood's current entertainment, not to mention some of the most despicable crap that's come in years past. I'm not saying it's right, but we've seen far worse.

As for the farting robot, there was an episode of Beast Wars where Rhinox farted constantly. I rarely, if ever, hear anyone complain about it. (That's not saying they haven't, I just haven't heard it.)

As for the sense of humor in the film...yes, it did cross a line and it wasn't suitable for kids. Why they went that route is not mysterious. Parents today just aren't doing their jobs as well as they should. Kids are filthmouthed, ill tempered little monsters when they want to be, and they've said far worse than we have. They say things today, that I'd have never dreamed of saying to my parents at their age. Because it's become socially acceptable, they're going to go with that kind of humor. The more offensive, the more it sells. Sad but true.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
Oh, I'm sure you could probably finagle an Oscar caliber level of writing out of the mythos (though I'm honestly not sure it's even remotely possible...), but would it be worth it? I don't think so. I'm betting it would be boring, it wouldn't make much money, and it would effectively kill the film franchise.


They could always reboot, nothing will kill a franchise like TF, you're kidding yourself if you think that something will. It's a long standing juggernaut of a toy-line, just think of how many toys you buy, and multiply that by a large percentage OF THE ENTIRE FRICKEN WORLD, it's not going away any time soon.

I don't think that those that decry ROTF as a POS, aren't doing so because they want Shakespeare, they just want a movie that doesn't add pointless juvenile garbage to a universe that is full of, as you say "explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN" opportunities!


Oh, I have no problem with a reboot...when the time is right. That time is not now. Spider-Man "4" is proof of that. The Incredible Hulk is further proof of that. And I'm not kidding myself here.

If the next movie(s) perform like a 3rdquel, etc normally does, that means the audience is starting to thin out. Kids are growing up way too fast, and we're pushing them to do so. If kids stop buying, parents will. If they don't make TFs worth buying, we'll stop buying as well. G1 died, no ifs, ands, or buts.

Until G2 came along, TF was dead in the water, at least as far as the US is concerned. Let's face it, G2 crashed and burned here. Hard. Beast Wars was the silver lining and singlehandedly revived a dead franchise. If it weren't for Jurassic Park being the super hit it was, I don't think Beast Wars would've taken off as well as it did. Once the public and business worlds saw that kids really do love animals and dinosaurs, they figured out ways to cash in. Hasbro just had an idea that was even more brilliant than JP (at least in terms of toys) But, if it weren't for those happy coincidences...TF would be dead in the water.

So, to say that they won't run out of ideas, to say that it's not possible for the audience to dry up, for kids to outgrow them completely...is utter silliness. All I'm saying is that we should enjoy the ride while it lasts, not overthink every piece of it and suck the fun out of it before it's done for us.

And I don't think the franchise needs more juvenile humor. Quite the opposite, in fact. It needs GOOD humor. (not the ice cream, it sucks) It needs to be above the gutter, and it's possible to do so. I was one of the first people to complain about them talking about masturbation in the first film. It blew my mind that such a joke would be in a movie like TransFormers. I couldn't wrap my mind around it being in there, and why they thought it would "fit". And it's currently one of the reasons why I can't stand the first movie any more.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
This is immature, puddle deep, explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN. That's how it's supposed to be. If you want deep, thought provoking science fiction, it exists. It just doesn't seem to in the world of TransFormers.

Once you realize that this is supposed to be all for FUN, not profit (except Hasbro's), not srs business, then perhaps you'll be able to fully enjoy it.


Yeah but what kind of fun!? Just because you find certain things fun, doesn't mean that everyone else does!


Fair enough. I should clarify. I mean fun in the sense that it's escapist entertainment, that for the most part it leaves you with a smile on your face, and it's usually a good time had by all. That feeling of no buyers remorse when you spend money on that ticket. That kind of fun. I fully believe the film franchise is capable of delivering that experience, and it has for me and many others, but I also believe it needs to be cleaned up, and made accessible to everyone. I've never said the films were perfect, and I won't, because they aren't. They need a lot of work, they really do. But they do provide a source of fun, you need only be willing to look past certain issues and embrace the inner kid to do so. However, if after all that, it's still not your cup of tea, so what? That's fine! If it doesn't make you happy, there's nothing wrong with that. Nothing will please everyone, all of the time. It's impossible. If you didn't like it, there's something else in the TF world that will. We shouldn't let the movies be the end all, be all of the TransFormers brand.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
I don't mind the movies getting darker and more serious, within reason, but the awe and wow factor in the first movie where we first meet Optimus and company is what this franchise needs. It needs humor, it needs liveliness, it needs more fun.

We grew up, we didn't grow old. Don't make the franchise do the same.


Woah! erm long post!...

Lets see Unicron and the Quintessons in the third film! Would make sense given that G1 Season 3 introduced the Quints, and Unicron happened before season 3, theres your "placating the G1 fans" covered! But Unicron will probably be a big farting ass or something, and the Quints, well maybe they'll become like hentacle **** monsters, Bah! who am I kidding!? That isn't adult, depraved, despicable, ugly and horrendous enough damnit! I simply can't wait for what they'll do next...


I'd surely hope Unicron doesn't make an appearance in the film series. There's just no way to capture him on film, correctly. He'll either be a massive joke, or a downtrodden bore.

The Quintessons (minus the hentacle thing...) just wouldn't fit either. I think they worked in G1 because G1 came out in a time when we were far more innocent, we were still wowed by the wonders of our world, and there was no question, G1 was 5 star entertainment. But, now that we're older, we can see both ends of the argument, and that G1 isn't what we thought it was, it just seems to me that things like Unicron and the Quintessons wouldn't work. Not in any respectable way.

Hot Rod/Rodimus Prime, Ultra Magnus, Blurr, etc? Yeah, they could work. But, for the most part, some things are better left to rest in the past.

And if Shia wants this film to be better than the last two, and have more class, then he needs to bring some to it as well. Tell Bay and the writers "No, I'm not going to spew a line about finding a tighter shirt. It's just a cheap laugh and it's stupid." and actually put some work into his performance. Megan Fox definitely needs to do the same. Especially Fox. Geez.

People blame Bay all the time, but...couldn't the actors or producers say "You know what? Let's film this scene THAT way. Let's try it and see if it sticks." But instead they say "Wait. I get to talk about man piss* and collect a check? Dumb me down. Now. ACTION!"

*= behind the scenes of TF1, filming in the L.A. River, cracking jokes about sitting in man piss, etc. While it's funny because it's true, don't be all guttural off camera when you think no one is looking, go back to being guttural on camera, and then bitch about it in the public eye.

That's not only two faced and hypocritical, it's pathetic.

If Shia truly wants TF3 to be the best, then he needs to step up and take some of the responsibility. Bay's been taking heat for a long while, he really doesn't need any more, but the rest of the people behind the camera, and those in front of it...yeah.

Maybe if they tried just a little bit more, they might just make a hit and with class.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074227)
Posted by D-340 on May 13th, 2010 @ 11:51pm CDT
Autobot032 wrote:


I'm...a little confused. Did anyone actually see the movie that Nub and I did? I mean, it was clearly TransFormers, and it clearly paid homage to G1 with some of the themes in it, and it had what everyone had asked for: More robots.

I still think people are expecting Oscar material out of this stuff. I think people are looking for Dreamwave level writing, where it's all "srsly" and so on. Well...here's a newsflash for you:

1.) Dreamwave was boring. It was downtrodden, too serious, and lacked any and all fun to be had.

2.) TransFormers started out as a hollow cartoon made as a commercial vehicle to sell TOYS. To children. Not Shakesperian drama to adults.

Revenge Of The Fallen WAS TransFormers. It WAS a lot of fun, it was loud, it was obnoxious and it sold toys, just like it's G1 counterpart.

Oh, I'm sure you could probably finagle an Oscar caliber level of writing out of the mythos (though I'm honestly not sure it's even remotely possible...), but would it be worth it? I don't think so. I'm betting it would be boring, it wouldn't make much money, and it would effectively kill the film franchise.

This is immature, puddle deep, explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN. That's how it's supposed to be. If you want deep, thought provoking science fiction, it exists. It just doesn't seem to in the world of TransFormers.

Once you realize that this is supposed to be all for FUN, not profit (except Hasbro's), not srs business, then perhaps you'll be able to fully enjoy it.

I don't mind the movies getting darker and more serious, within reason, but the awe and wow factor in the first movie where we first meet Optimus and company is what this franchise needs. It needs humor, it needs liveliness, it needs more fun.

We grew up, we didn't grow old. Don't make the franchise do the same.



All of my thoughts on your post are summed up in this video someone here shared with me:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/ ... rs-Revenge

ROTF was not Transformers. It was a second rate American Pie with giant robots. Fire Bay. Fire the writers. Recast the movie with actors that have a shred of talent. And maybe, just maybe, we'll get a decent movie.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074230)
Posted by gigazarak on May 14th, 2010 @ 12:11am CDT
Autobot032 wrote:
gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
gigazarak wrote:
Evil_the_Nub wrote:
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.


Well First-Aid did say that...

First-Aid wrote:There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie.


Which is true I think.


I'm with Nub on this one. You don't get much more caught in the middle than having your family kidnapped by the villain(s), and having to be a hero not only for yourself, but your alien friends.

I'm...a little confused. Did anyone actually see the movie that Nub and I did? I mean, it was clearly TransFormers, and it clearly paid homage to G1 with some of the themes in it, and it had what everyone had asked for: More robots.

I still think people are expecting Oscar material out of this stuff. I think people are looking for Dreamwave level writing, where it's all "srsly" and so on. Well...here's a newsflash for you:

1.) Dreamwave was boring. It was downtrodden, too serious, and lacked any and all fun to be had.


Who was it aimed at? Old fans of G1! Who weren't kids anymore! It's fair to make the comics a little more meaty in terms of themes than the cartoons, you found them boring? Well thats your opinion, and you have a right to it I suppose, more interesting comics for the rest of us...


And more power to you. If you enjoy them, good for you.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
2.) TransFormers started out as a hollow cartoon made as a commercial vehicle to sell TOYS. To children. Not Shakesperian drama to adults.

Revenge Of The Fallen WAS TransFormers. It WAS a lot of fun, it was loud, it was obnoxious and it sold toys, just like it's G1 counterpart.


Sure it did sell toys, no doubting you there, but fun huh? Who's having fun!? Lets see what fun we have here...
    John Turturros ass
    Leg humping robot
    Racial stereotype borderline offensive Twins
    Farting robot
    Robot testicles
    Insult after insult to your intelligence..
    ... god do I need to mention any more!?

Are any of those things G1? it's things like these that bring the tone of the franchise down, to a level lower than just mere kids-fare entertainment, it just becomes depraved and self-indulgent. I took my kids to see the movie, all the borderline adult humour was a bit much for their tiny little minds, and while I'm no conservative nut-job, I did find it a bit much for them, (my kids are 3 and 6y/o btw which is roughly the age I was when tf first happened to me in 84)... So ROTF in my mind, changed the focus on who TF was aimed at, it's not little kids anymore, barely teenagers either! So what? TF has matured then? Hardly..


I'm with you on everything except the twins, and the farting robot.
The twins, while tasteless, were hardly offensive in comparison to some of Hollywood's current entertainment, not to mention some of the most despicable crap that's come in years past. I'm not saying it's right, but we've seen far worse.

As for the farting robot, there was an episode of Beast Wars where Rhinox farted constantly. I rarely, if ever, hear anyone complain about it. (That's not saying they haven't, I just haven't heard it.)

Thats a good point, and you're right, no-one does complain about that, and I certainly don't either, maybe I'm being too harsh, because flatulence is innocent enough, it's crude, but it's all in the way you handle the idea of it. It's a universal "feature" of being human that we can all relate to. So ok, scratch the farting, but it's just another brutal insult to our intelligence, that I just had to mention it, certainly when you consider the rest of the list, it builds up a critical mass enough to think bad things UNIVERSALLY about the movie.
Autobot032 wrote:
As for the sense of humor in the film...yes, it did cross a line and it wasn't suitable for kids. Why they went that route is not mysterious. Parents today just aren't doing their jobs as well as they should. Kids are filthmouthed, ill tempered little monsters when they want to be, and they've said far worse than we have. They say things today, that I'd have never dreamed of saying to my parents at their age. Because it's become socially acceptable, they're going to go with that kind of humor. The more offensive, the more it sells. Sad but true.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
Oh, I'm sure you could probably finagle an Oscar caliber level of writing out of the mythos (though I'm honestly not sure it's even remotely possible...), but would it be worth it? I don't think so. I'm betting it would be boring, it wouldn't make much money, and it would effectively kill the film franchise.


They could always reboot, nothing will kill a franchise like TF, you're kidding yourself if you think that something will. It's a long standing juggernaut of a toy-line, just think of how many toys you buy, and multiply that by a large percentage OF THE ENTIRE FRICKEN WORLD, it's not going away any time soon.

I don't think that those that decry ROTF as a POS, aren't doing so because they want Shakespeare, they just want a movie that doesn't add pointless juvenile garbage to a universe that is full of, as you say "explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN" opportunities!


Oh, I have no problem with a reboot...when the time is right. That time is not now. Spider-Man "4" is proof of that. The Incredible Hulk is further proof of that. And I'm not kidding myself here.

If the next movie(s) perform like a 3rdquel, etc normally does, that means the audience is starting to thin out. Kids are growing up way too fast, and we're pushing them to do so. If kids stop buying, parents will. If they don't make TFs worth buying, we'll stop buying as well. G1 died, no ifs, ands, or buts.

Until G2 came along, TF was dead in the water, at least as far as the US is concerned. Let's face it, G2 crashed and burned here. Hard. Beast Wars was the silver lining and singlehandedly revived a dead franchise. If it weren't for Jurassic Park being the super hit it was, I don't think Beast Wars would've taken off as well as it did. Once the public and business worlds saw that kids really do love animals and dinosaurs, they figured out ways to cash in. Hasbro just had an idea that was even more brilliant than JP (at least in terms of toys) But, if it weren't for those happy coincidences...TF would be dead in the water.

You're quoting history, and you're right, but I remain confidant that TF would have found a way, Jurassic Park or not.
Autobot032 wrote:
So, to say that they won't run out of ideas, to say that it's not possible for the audience to dry up, for kids to outgrow them completely...is utter silliness. All I'm saying is that we should enjoy the ride while it lasts, not overthink every piece of it and suck the fun out of it before it's done for us.

And I don't think the franchise needs more juvenile humor. Quite the opposite, in fact. It needs GOOD humor. (not the ice cream, it sucks) It needs to be above the gutter, and it's possible to do so. I was one of the first people to complain about them talking about masturbation in the first film. It blew my mind that such a joke would be in a movie like TransFormers. I couldn't wrap my mind around it being in there, and why they thought it would "fit". And it's currently one of the reasons why I can't stand the first movie any more.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
This is immature, puddle deep, explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN. That's how it's supposed to be. If you want deep, thought provoking science fiction, it exists. It just doesn't seem to in the world of TransFormers.

Once you realize that this is supposed to be all for FUN, not profit (except Hasbro's), not srs business, then perhaps you'll be able to fully enjoy it.


Yeah but what kind of fun!? Just because you find certain things fun, doesn't mean that everyone else does!


Fair enough. I should clarify. I mean fun in the sense that it's escapist entertainment, that for the most part it leaves you with a smile on your face, and it's usually a good time had by all. That feeling of no buyers remorse when you spend money on that ticket. That kind of fun. I fully believe the film franchise is capable of delivering that experience, and it has for me and many others, but I also believe it needs to be cleaned up, and made accessible to everyone. I've never said the films were perfect, and I won't, because they aren't. They need a lot of work, they really do. But they do provide a source of fun, you need only be willing to look past certain issues and embrace the inner kid to do so. However, if after all that, it's still not your cup of tea, so what? That's fine! If it doesn't make you happy, there's nothing wrong with that. Nothing will please everyone, all of the time. It's impossible. If you didn't like it, there's something else in the TF world that will. We shouldn't let the movies be the end all, be all of the TransFormers brand.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
I don't mind the movies getting darker and more serious, within reason, but the awe and wow factor in the first movie where we first meet Optimus and company is what this franchise needs. It needs humor, it needs liveliness, it needs more fun.

We grew up, we didn't grow old. Don't make the franchise do the same.


Woah! erm long post!...

Lets see Unicron and the Quintessons in the third film! Would make sense given that G1 Season 3 introduced the Quints, and Unicron happened before season 3, theres your "placating the G1 fans" covered! But Unicron will probably be a big farting ass or something, and the Quints, well maybe they'll become like hentacle **** monsters, Bah! who am I kidding!? That isn't adult, depraved, despicable, ugly and horrendous enough damnit! I simply can't wait for what they'll do next...


I'd surely hope Unicron doesn't make an appearance in the film series. There's just no way to capture him on film, correctly. He'll either be a massive joke, or a downtrodden bore.

The Quintessons (minus the hentacle thing...) just wouldn't fit either. I think they worked in G1 because G1 came out in a time when we were far more innocent, we were still wowed by the wonders of our world, and there was no question, G1 was 5 star entertainment. But, now that we're older, we can see both ends of the argument, and that G1 isn't what we thought it was, it just seems to me that things like Unicron and the Quintessons wouldn't work. Not in any respectable way.

Hot Rod/Rodimus Prime, Ultra Magnus, Blurr, etc? Yeah, they could work. But, for the most part, some things are better left to rest in the past.

And if Shia wants this film to be better than the last two, and have more class, then he needs to bring some to it as well. Tell Bay and the writers "No, I'm not going to spew a line about finding a tighter shirt. It's just a cheap laugh and it's stupid." and actually put some work into his performance. Megan Fox definitely needs to do the same. Especially Fox. Geez.

People blame Bay all the time, but...couldn't the actors or producers say "You know what? Let's film this scene THAT way. Let's try it and see if it sticks." But instead they say "Wait. I get to talk about man piss* and collect a check? Dumb me down. Now. ACTION!"

*= behind the scenes of TF1, filming in the L.A. River, cracking jokes about sitting in man piss, etc. While it's funny because it's true, don't be all guttural off camera when you think no one is looking, go back to being guttural on camera, and then bitch about it in the public eye.

That's not only two faced and hypocritical, it's pathetic.


Agreed.

Autobot032 wrote:
If Shia truly wants TF3 to be the best, then he needs to step up and take some of the responsibility. Bay's been taking heat for a long while, he really doesn't need any more, but the rest of the people behind the camera, and those in front of it...yeah.

Maybe if they tried just a little bit more, they might just make a hit and with class.


Shias attitude is a case of "biting the hand that feeds you", which makes him seem a touch ungrateful
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074283)
Posted by Prime Riblet on May 14th, 2010 @ 6:46am CDT
omega666 wrote:I loved this movie. I really do not see what the problem is. People expect some Oscar winning movie. It's Transformers. I got what I want out of it and was happy. Robots beating the hell out of other robots.


This is exactly right, IMO.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074284)
Posted by Prime Riblet on May 14th, 2010 @ 6:49am CDT
Diem wrote:I hated those scenes and I personally wish they weren't there but Bay's not wrong in inserting such scenes if the general public loves them.


I also agree with this. It wasn't my bag either, but this is how the world works. It always has and it always will.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074304)
Posted by RiddlerJ on May 14th, 2010 @ 8:26am CDT
I don't buy that Shia really belives his comments. I think, now that they're revving up for a third movie, they want to get as many people as they can so they'll have cast and crew members now agree with the critics and assure them that it'll be better this time. Now that's they've made all their money from amovie they supposedly were all ashamed of.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074390)
Posted by gigazarak on May 14th, 2010 @ 2:08pm CDT
RiddlerJ wrote:I don't buy that Shia really belives his comments. I think, now that they're revving up for a third movie, they want to get as many people as they can so they'll have cast and crew members now agree with the critics and assure them that it'll be better this time. Now that's they've made all their money from amovie they supposedly were all ashamed of.

Thats a fair point, it is "all talk" after all. It still paints the picture of Shia as a petulant ungrateful little sh!t tho, which is probably the intended effect.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074396)
Posted by Dagon on May 14th, 2010 @ 2:34pm CDT
I don't know who he thinks he's fooling, Shia isn't exactly the greatest actor of all time. Or even a very good one. He wasn't very good in Indiana Jones or Eagle Eye either. No, I haven't seen his every celluloid appearance, but what I have seen, he's not that great.


Ok, I just wanted to say that. I now await my flaming for thinking differently.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074473)
Posted by First-Aid on May 14th, 2010 @ 4:38pm CDT
OK, let me clarity my point a little bit from WAAAAAAAAAAYYYY back when I posted (wow there are some LOOONG posts in this thread).

Yes Sam's parents were kidnapped and he was thrust into the middle of the war. But, honestly, at this point there are a very small number of humans who have been affected by the war. The attacks in the second movie can be explained off as terrorist attacks. The global hack can be explained as a terrorist group trying to scare the populace. We honestly have yet to see any serious consequences to the human race from this war. Why? At this point there are not enough TransFormers on Earth to do large scale damage and cause the proper panic that an alien war would potential induce. I would LOVE to see that aspect explored.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074476)
Posted by Torneira on May 14th, 2010 @ 4:43pm CDT
I kinda liked ROTF. Especially that spiritual part with Shia and the matrix of leadership.
And when Optimus Prime sais:"I'll take you all on"!

What I don't like is that Megatron suddenly has someone outranking him.
And that Starscream is being portraited as more cowardly towards Megatron than ever without being very treacherous at the same time.

But I believe if you criticise this movie, then you can criticise a bunch of movies.

Because what was originally meant to be a cartoon for kids, now has to be an academy award winning action Sci-Fi. Yet it still has to target the kids of today, because without them a lot of toys and merchandising simply won't be sold.

So, what is it that we want?
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074487)
Posted by gigazarak on May 14th, 2010 @ 5:18pm CDT
First-Aid wrote:OK, let me clarity my point a little bit from WAAAAAAAAAAYYYY back when I posted (wow there are some LOOONG posts in this thread).

Yes Sam's parents were kidnapped and he was thrust into the middle of the war. But, honestly, at this point there are a very small number of humans who have been affected by the war. The attacks in the second movie can be explained off as terrorist attacks. The global hack can be explained as a terrorist group trying to scare the populace. We honestly have yet to see any serious consequences to the human race from this war. Why? At this point there are not enough TransFormers on Earth to do large scale damage and cause the proper panic that an alien war would potential induce. I would LOVE to see that aspect explored.


You want "All Hail Megatron" or the recent Ongoing comic in the movies don't you? I must admit, it would be cool, and I see your point, while there was large scale destruction to human civilizations and stuff in the previous movies, there was not enough of a focus on the IMPACT that giant robots have had on our world right? We have only really seen how it affects a petulant young guy, slightly bent from everyday parents, army guys, and an orange woman, oh and a few more orange people too. Wheres the Independence Day like broadcast from the President to the human race? "Today, we face a threat unlike any other, this is a day, that will go down in history, a day of reckoning, a day of destruction" blah blah blah, etc. (pretty easy to write that stuff huh?) But do we really want that? I mean the movies were pretty 1 dimensional, as I've said before, this kind of addition would only add some unwanted American sentimentality to the franchise, which I can see Bay doing wonderfully tedious things with! Geez, now that I've said it, it'll probably happen! Damn it!
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074721)
Posted by KingEmperor on May 15th, 2010 @ 12:54pm CDT
gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
gigazarak wrote:
Evil_the_Nub wrote:
First-Aid wrote:One of the biggest allures for me IS the human element, but not the element of participation of humans. I'm looking at the war itself. Remember their teaser posters for the first one? "Their war. Our world." The whole story is supposed to be about a war between two factions of alien robots...BUT WITH HUMANS CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE. There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie. To me, THAT is the human element...the humans getting in the way of the war, and the consequences of that. If this is what they are talking about- and judging by the way Shia is saying humans are dying left and right- then they are definitely on the right track. That way you get giant robots fighting everywhere, but the humans getting killed in the middle and the consequences of such.

That's what the movie was about, Sam got caught in the middle of the war. The Decepticons attacked Earth and kidnapped his parents to get a hold of him. You can't get more in the middle than that.


Well First-Aid did say that...

First-Aid wrote:There really was not a lot of the "caught in the middle" aspect in the second movie.


Which is true I think.


I'm with Nub on this one. You don't get much more caught in the middle than having your family kidnapped by the villain(s), and having to be a hero not only for yourself, but your alien friends.

I'm...a little confused. Did anyone actually see the movie that Nub and I did? I mean, it was clearly TransFormers, and it clearly paid homage to G1 with some of the themes in it, and it had what everyone had asked for: More robots.

I still think people are expecting Oscar material out of this stuff. I think people are looking for Dreamwave level writing, where it's all "srsly" and so on. Well...here's a newsflash for you:

1.) Dreamwave was boring. It was downtrodden, too serious, and lacked any and all fun to be had.


Who was it aimed at? Old fans of G1! Who weren't kids anymore! It's fair to make the comics a little more meaty in terms of themes than the cartoons, you found them boring? Well thats your opinion, and you have a right to it I suppose, more interesting comics for the rest of us...


And more power to you. If you enjoy them, good for you.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
2.) TransFormers started out as a hollow cartoon made as a commercial vehicle to sell TOYS. To children. Not Shakesperian drama to adults.

Revenge Of The Fallen WAS TransFormers. It WAS a lot of fun, it was loud, it was obnoxious and it sold toys, just like it's G1 counterpart.


Sure it did sell toys, no doubting you there, but fun huh? Who's having fun!? Lets see what fun we have here...
    John Turturros ass
    Leg humping robot
    Racial stereotype borderline offensive Twins
    Farting robot
    Robot testicles
    Insult after insult to your intelligence..
    ... god do I need to mention any more!?

Are any of those things G1? it's things like these that bring the tone of the franchise down, to a level lower than just mere kids-fare entertainment, it just becomes depraved and self-indulgent. I took my kids to see the movie, all the borderline adult humour was a bit much for their tiny little minds, and while I'm no conservative nut-job, I did find it a bit much for them, (my kids are 3 and 6y/o btw which is roughly the age I was when tf first happened to me in 84)... So ROTF in my mind, changed the focus on who TF was aimed at, it's not little kids anymore, barely teenagers either! So what? TF has matured then? Hardly..


I'm with you on everything except the twins, and the farting robot.
The twins, while tasteless, were hardly offensive in comparison to some of Hollywood's current entertainment, not to mention some of the most despicable crap that's come in years past. I'm not saying it's right, but we've seen far worse.

As for the farting robot, there was an episode of Beast Wars where Rhinox farted constantly. I rarely, if ever, hear anyone complain about it. (That's not saying they haven't, I just haven't heard it.)

Thats a good point, and you're right, no-one does complain about that, and I certainly don't either, maybe I'm being too harsh, because flatulence is innocent enough, it's crude, but it's all in the way you handle the idea of it. It's a universal "feature" of being human that we can all relate to. So ok, scratch the farting, but it's just another brutal insult to our intelligence, that I just had to mention it, certainly when you consider the rest of the list, it builds up a critical mass enough to think bad things UNIVERSALLY about the movie.
Autobot032 wrote:
As for the sense of humor in the film...yes, it did cross a line and it wasn't suitable for kids. Why they went that route is not mysterious. Parents today just aren't doing their jobs as well as they should. Kids are filthmouthed, ill tempered little monsters when they want to be, and they've said far worse than we have. They say things today, that I'd have never dreamed of saying to my parents at their age. Because it's become socially acceptable, they're going to go with that kind of humor. The more offensive, the more it sells. Sad but true.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
Oh, I'm sure you could probably finagle an Oscar caliber level of writing out of the mythos (though I'm honestly not sure it's even remotely possible...), but would it be worth it? I don't think so. I'm betting it would be boring, it wouldn't make much money, and it would effectively kill the film franchise.


They could always reboot, nothing will kill a franchise like TF, you're kidding yourself if you think that something will. It's a long standing juggernaut of a toy-line, just think of how many toys you buy, and multiply that by a large percentage OF THE ENTIRE FRICKEN WORLD, it's not going away any time soon.

I don't think that those that decry ROTF as a POS, aren't doing so because they want Shakespeare, they just want a movie that doesn't add pointless juvenile garbage to a universe that is full of, as you say "explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN" opportunities!


Oh, I have no problem with a reboot...when the time is right. That time is not now. Spider-Man "4" is proof of that. The Incredible Hulk is further proof of that. And I'm not kidding myself here.

If the next movie(s) perform like a 3rdquel, etc normally does, that means the audience is starting to thin out. Kids are growing up way too fast, and we're pushing them to do so. If kids stop buying, parents will. If they don't make TFs worth buying, we'll stop buying as well. G1 died, no ifs, ands, or buts.

Until G2 came along, TF was dead in the water, at least as far as the US is concerned. Let's face it, G2 crashed and burned here. Hard. Beast Wars was the silver lining and singlehandedly revived a dead franchise. If it weren't for Jurassic Park being the super hit it was, I don't think Beast Wars would've taken off as well as it did. Once the public and business worlds saw that kids really do love animals and dinosaurs, they figured out ways to cash in. Hasbro just had an idea that was even more brilliant than JP (at least in terms of toys) But, if it weren't for those happy coincidences...TF would be dead in the water.

You're quoting history, and you're right, but I remain confidant that TF would have found a way, Jurassic Park or not.
Autobot032 wrote:
So, to say that they won't run out of ideas, to say that it's not possible for the audience to dry up, for kids to outgrow them completely...is utter silliness. All I'm saying is that we should enjoy the ride while it lasts, not overthink every piece of it and suck the fun out of it before it's done for us.

And I don't think the franchise needs more juvenile humor. Quite the opposite, in fact. It needs GOOD humor. (not the ice cream, it sucks) It needs to be above the gutter, and it's possible to do so. I was one of the first people to complain about them talking about masturbation in the first film. It blew my mind that such a joke would be in a movie like TransFormers. I couldn't wrap my mind around it being in there, and why they thought it would "fit". And it's currently one of the reasons why I can't stand the first movie any more.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
This is immature, puddle deep, explosion-a-rama, popcorn flick FUN. That's how it's supposed to be. If you want deep, thought provoking science fiction, it exists. It just doesn't seem to in the world of TransFormers.

Once you realize that this is supposed to be all for FUN, not profit (except Hasbro's), not srs business, then perhaps you'll be able to fully enjoy it.


Yeah but what kind of fun!? Just because you find certain things fun, doesn't mean that everyone else does!


Fair enough. I should clarify. I mean fun in the sense that it's escapist entertainment, that for the most part it leaves you with a smile on your face, and it's usually a good time had by all. That feeling of no buyers remorse when you spend money on that ticket. That kind of fun. I fully believe the film franchise is capable of delivering that experience, and it has for me and many others, but I also believe it needs to be cleaned up, and made accessible to everyone. I've never said the films were perfect, and I won't, because they aren't. They need a lot of work, they really do. But they do provide a source of fun, you need only be willing to look past certain issues and embrace the inner kid to do so. However, if after all that, it's still not your cup of tea, so what? That's fine! If it doesn't make you happy, there's nothing wrong with that. Nothing will please everyone, all of the time. It's impossible. If you didn't like it, there's something else in the TF world that will. We shouldn't let the movies be the end all, be all of the TransFormers brand.

gigazarak wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
I don't mind the movies getting darker and more serious, within reason, but the awe and wow factor in the first movie where we first meet Optimus and company is what this franchise needs. It needs humor, it needs liveliness, it needs more fun.

We grew up, we didn't grow old. Don't make the franchise do the same.


Woah! erm long post!...

Lets see Unicron and the Quintessons in the third film! Would make sense given that G1 Season 3 introduced the Quints, and Unicron happened before season 3, theres your "placating the G1 fans" covered! But Unicron will probably be a big farting ass or something, and the Quints, well maybe they'll become like hentacle **** monsters, Bah! who am I kidding!? That isn't adult, depraved, despicable, ugly and horrendous enough damnit! I simply can't wait for what they'll do next...


I'd surely hope Unicron doesn't make an appearance in the film series. There's just no way to capture him on film, correctly. He'll either be a massive joke, or a downtrodden bore.

The Quintessons (minus the hentacle thing...) just wouldn't fit either. I think they worked in G1 because G1 came out in a time when we were far more innocent, we were still wowed by the wonders of our world, and there was no question, G1 was 5 star entertainment. But, now that we're older, we can see both ends of the argument, and that G1 isn't what we thought it was, it just seems to me that things like Unicron and the Quintessons wouldn't work. Not in any respectable way.

Hot Rod/Rodimus Prime, Ultra Magnus, Blurr, etc? Yeah, they could work. But, for the most part, some things are better left to rest in the past.

And if Shia wants this film to be better than the last two, and have more class, then he needs to bring some to it as well. Tell Bay and the writers "No, I'm not going to spew a line about finding a tighter shirt. It's just a cheap laugh and it's stupid." and actually put some work into his performance. Megan Fox definitely needs to do the same. Especially Fox. Geez.

People blame Bay all the time, but...couldn't the actors or producers say "You know what? Let's film this scene THAT way. Let's try it and see if it sticks." But instead they say "Wait. I get to talk about man piss* and collect a check? Dumb me down. Now. ACTION!"

*= behind the scenes of TF1, filming in the L.A. River, cracking jokes about sitting in man piss, etc. While it's funny because it's true, don't be all guttural off camera when you think no one is looking, go back to being guttural on camera, and then bitch about it in the public eye.

That's not only two faced and hypocritical, it's pathetic.


Agreed.

Autobot032 wrote:
If Shia truly wants TF3 to be the best, then he needs to step up and take some of the responsibility. Bay's been taking heat for a long while, he really doesn't need any more, but the rest of the people behind the camera, and those in front of it...yeah.

Maybe if they tried just a little bit more, they might just make a hit and with class.


Shias attitude is a case of "biting the hand that feeds you", which makes him seem a touch ungrateful


I agree. The actors, writers, and producers are always saying, "this movie is gonna be big, gonna be great, etc." and they help build up the hype. But when it comes out and it's not recieved critically well, they all run for cover and the director takes all the blame. Now, I believe many things in ROTF wasn't necessary and needed to be left out, but all in all, I loved the movie. It was enjoyable.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074768)
Posted by gigazarak on May 15th, 2010 @ 3:05pm CDT
KingEmperor wrote:I agree. The actors, writers, and producers are always saying, "this movie is gonna be big, gonna be great, etc." and they help build up the hype. But when it comes out and it's not recieved critically well, they all run for cover and the director takes all the blame. Now, I believe many things in ROTF wasn't necessary and needed to be left out, but all in all, I loved the movie. It was enjoyable.

Well thats ultimately what we should take away from the movies, that they were enjoyable thrill rides. But it's just annoying that so many other unnecessary things were put in there that people remember and for some, become all you can think about the movie, when it just should have been about giant robots.
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074875)
Posted by vectorA3 on May 15th, 2010 @ 11:07pm CDT
......"wasn't impressed with what we did. But I got a huge paycheck, and that's all that matters." "F--- the G1 fans. They all suck." :P

yes, the writers & Bay & the studio which decided to make it in the middle of a strike are all share equal blame.

I say just kill all the humans with one of WJ's inventions (or the Dinobots) and just have an all out war. Autobots vs. Decepticons vs. Quints vs. Unicron!!!!!!! Every faction for themself!!!!!!!
Re: Shia LeBeouf - "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did." (1074930)
Posted by primal primus on May 16th, 2010 @ 5:43am CDT
you would'nt be impressed either if you saw devastator's balls.

[ Incoming message. Source unknown. ] No Signal - Please Stand By [ Click to attempt signal recovery... ]


Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "MX-00 UNICRON + DEAD END Transformers Micron Legends Armada Takara 2003 New"
MX-00 UNICRON + DE ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "SIDE BURN Transformers Legacy United Deluxe Class RID Hasbro 2024 New"
SIDE BURN Transfor ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "REPUGNUS Transformers Cybertron Scout complete + s48r key Hasbro 2006 250427"
REPUGNUS Transform ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "GAME OLDER Transformers BotBots Series 4 Retro Replays 2020 game cartridge"
GAME OLDER Transfo ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "ARMADA GALVATRON Transformers Legacy United Leader Class Hasbro 2024 New"
ARMADA GALVATRON T ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "ARMADA WHEELJACK Transformers Legacy United Deluxe Class Hasbro 2025 New"
ARMADA WHEELJACK T ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #21 Cvr G Energon Universe Image Comics 2025 0425IM425 21G Howard"
TRANSFORMERS #21 C ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "ENERGON GALVATRON Transformers Legacy United Core Class Hasbro 2024 New"
ENERGON GALVATRON ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "SIDEWAYS Transformers Cybertron deluxe complete + dj51 key Hasbro 2005 250415"
SIDEWAYS Transform ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #21 Cvr F Energon Universe Image Comics 2025 0425IM424 21F Howard"
TRANSFORMERS #21 C ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "RED ALERT Transformers Cybertron Legends of Cybertron complete 2005 240906A"
RED ALERT Transfor ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TIDAL WAVE + Mini-Con RAMJET Transformers Armada Giga-Con complete 2003 250416"
TIDAL WAVE + Mini- ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THUNDERCRACKER Transformers Cybertron Legends of Cybertron complete 2006 230719A"
THUNDERCRACKER Tra ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy Evolution STRONGARM Deluxe Class RID Universe Hasbro 2023 Ne"
Transformers Legac ...
These are affiliate links. We may earn a commission.
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.

Featured Products on Amazon.com

Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Battleslash" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Autobot Tailgate" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Power of the Primes Punch-Counterpunch and Prima Prime" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Deluxe Misfire and Aimless" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Leader Evolution Rodimus Prime" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Cindersaur" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Studio Series 12 Voyager Class Movie 1 Decepticon Brawl" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Deluxe Class Dinobot Sludge" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Legends Class Autobot Stripes" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Tra Rid Warrior Soundwave Action Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Deluxe Slugslinger and Caliburst" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: The Last Knight -- Knight Armor Turbo Changer Optimus Prime" on AMAZON
These are affiliate links. We may earn a commission.
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.