TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
Tuesday, April 24th, 2012 1:16AM CDT
Categories: Toy News, Reviews, Collectors' Club NewsPosted by: El Duque Views: 33,886
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Seibertron.com member caked-up has received his TFCC 2012 membership incentive figure Runamuck and uploaded a video review. Check out his review of the highly anticipated figure embedded below.
Credit(s): caked-up
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
SEIBERTRON Turns 25! Celebrate with 25% off Transformers Toys + Energon Universe Comics
39,569 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
News Categories: Toy News, Movie News, Cartoon News, Comic Book News, Site News, Rumors, Events, Media Vault, Collectibles, Sponsor News, Game News, Site Articles, Reviews, Retailer News, People News, Company News, Sightings, Press Releases, Unlicensed Products News, Auctions, Transtopia, Interviews, Voices, Collectors' Club News, Knock Offs, Twincasts, Heavy Metal War, Contests, Book News, Top Lists
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372319)
Posted by zodconvoy on April 24th, 2012 @ 2:24am CDT
Posted by zodconvoy on April 24th, 2012 @ 2:24am CDT
A good review but i have to disagree with him on his point that the club should have made one of them from Tracks. The Tracks version is good but 1) not as good as Wheeljack and 2) wouldn't work for either Runamuck or Runabout.
Still, it's good to see them in a video together finally! Now to see either of them in my collection.
Still, it's good to see them in a video together finally! Now to see either of them in my collection.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372327)
Posted by caked-up on April 24th, 2012 @ 4:46am CDT
Posted by caked-up on April 24th, 2012 @ 4:46am CDT
I can see your point, but what about the Tracks mold would make it an inferior choice?
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372355)
Posted by Banjo-Tron on April 24th, 2012 @ 7:09am CDT
Posted by Banjo-Tron on April 24th, 2012 @ 7:09am CDT
Nice review man. I'm pretty sure that Tracks is taller than Wheeljack because of the differing transformation, so then the Battlechargers would be different heights. I like the fact that the Wheeljack mould was used for both.
Can't wait for mine to arrive.
Can't wait for mine to arrive.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372356)
Posted by gavinfuzzy on April 24th, 2012 @ 7:21am CDT
Posted by gavinfuzzy on April 24th, 2012 @ 7:21am CDT
Got mine today
Well, it's still in the US, and i'll only get it in June...
Well, it's still in the US, and i'll only get it in June...
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372375)
Posted by Optimusfan79 on April 24th, 2012 @ 8:45am CDT
No not really. If you look at the toys & cartoon the top of the cars was their legs, but if you use Tracks you would have the under bottoms as the legs. Which wouldn't make it g1 accurate. Just got mine a few seconds ago!
Posted by Optimusfan79 on April 24th, 2012 @ 8:45am CDT
caked-up wrote:I can see your point, but what about the Tracks mold would make it an inferior choice?
No not really. If you look at the toys & cartoon the top of the cars was their legs, but if you use Tracks you would have the under bottoms as the legs. Which wouldn't make it g1 accurate. Just got mine a few seconds ago!
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372393)
Posted by PowerEncarnate on April 24th, 2012 @ 9:50am CDT
Posted by PowerEncarnate on April 24th, 2012 @ 9:50am CDT
I can see both sides of this argument. i think all we needed was the tracks front clip/heels and remove the spoiler from runabout/over-run to have him different and more g1. with the tracks/wj heels/feet being on ball socket they could have had the parts swapped out and additional paint apps added to make the swapped parts fit the colors of the individual figures(sg tracks and over-run) but all in all I like them. still upset with funpub for not controlling the quantity ordered on these guys like they said they would after the p/cp deal.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372405)
Posted by caked-up on April 24th, 2012 @ 10:39am CDT
Posted by caked-up on April 24th, 2012 @ 10:39am CDT
Okay. I understand about the accuracy to G1 being important so I will back down from the Tracks mold concept, but that tidbit about using some pieces from Tracks sounds pretty good to me. Mechhaven's idea for the bumper and spoiler to be different is intriguing to me, but I would also add the missiles as well. Regardless of the desired changes, I love these two rockheads the way they are.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372428)
Posted by Hotrodimust on April 24th, 2012 @ 11:16am CDT
Posted by Hotrodimust on April 24th, 2012 @ 11:16am CDT
I would love to get mine in the mail soon I keep reading about all these people getting theirs but nothing for little ol me why does my collection always gotta be late to the party 
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review (1372672)
Posted by autobot4ever on April 24th, 2012 @ 11:53pm CDT
Posted by autobot4ever on April 24th, 2012 @ 11:53pm CDT
Got mine today after getting home from work, best Monday ever!!!
[ Click to attempt signal recovery... ]
