TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
Posted by El Duque
Apr 24, 2012 at 1:16am CDT
33,903 views
View Discussion
Sign in
or
Join
to reply
More Bots. More News. More Awesome.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by zodconvoy
Apr 24, 2012
A good review but i have to disagree with him on his point that the club should have made one of them from Tracks. The Tracks version is good but 1) not as good as Wheeljack and 2) wouldn't work for either Runamuck or Runabout.
Still, it's good to see them in a video together finally! Now to see either of them in my collection.
Still, it's good to see them in a video together finally! Now to see either of them in my collection.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by caked-up
Apr 24, 2012
I can see your point, but what about the Tracks mold would make it an inferior choice?
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by Banjo-Tron
Apr 24, 2012
Nice review man. I'm pretty sure that Tracks is taller than Wheeljack because of the differing transformation, so then the Battlechargers would be different heights. I like the fact that the Wheeljack mould was used for both.
Can't wait for mine to arrive.
Can't wait for mine to arrive.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by gavinfuzzy
Apr 24, 2012
Got mine today
Well, it's still in the US, and i'll only get it in June...
Well, it's still in the US, and i'll only get it in June...
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
No not really. If you look at the toys & cartoon the top of the cars was their legs, but if you use Tracks you would have the under bottoms as the legs. Which wouldn't make it g1 accurate. Just got mine a few seconds ago!
Comment by Optimusfan79
Apr 24, 2012
caked-up wrote:I can see your point, but what about the Tracks mold would make it an inferior choice?
No not really. If you look at the toys & cartoon the top of the cars was their legs, but if you use Tracks you would have the under bottoms as the legs. Which wouldn't make it g1 accurate. Just got mine a few seconds ago!
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by PowerEncarnate
Apr 24, 2012
I can see both sides of this argument. i think all we needed was the tracks front clip/heels and remove the spoiler from runabout/over-run to have him different and more g1. with the tracks/wj heels/feet being on ball socket they could have had the parts swapped out and additional paint apps added to make the swapped parts fit the colors of the individual figures(sg tracks and over-run) but all in all I like them. still upset with funpub for not controlling the quantity ordered on these guys like they said they would after the p/cp deal.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by caked-up
Apr 24, 2012
Okay. I understand about the accuracy to G1 being important so I will back down from the Tracks mold concept, but that tidbit about using some pieces from Tracks sounds pretty good to me. Mechhaven's idea for the bumper and spoiler to be different is intriguing to me, but I would also add the missiles as well. Regardless of the desired changes, I love these two rockheads the way they are.
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by Hotrodimust
Apr 24, 2012
I would love to get mine in the mail soon I keep reading about all these people getting theirs but nothing for little ol me why does my collection always gotta be late to the party 
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by autobot4ever
Apr 24, 2012
Got mine today after getting home from work, best Monday ever!!!
Re: TFCC 2012 Membership Incentive Figure Runamuck Video Review
(view post)
Comment by caked-up
May 22, 2012
I love it when there is something at your doorstep on Monday's. It just makes a bad Monday better.
