Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal
May 6, 2016 at 9:19am CDT
45,989 views
View Discussion
Sign in
or
Join
to reply
More Bots. More News. More Awesome.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by PrymeStriker
May 6, 2016
I'm sure CN or someone could cancel the show before this makes it through finalization, but I still sincerely hope there's a season three. I really want them to explore that whole Cybertron council thing that Ratchet hinted at in the finale.
That's a high possibility. Jazz answers directly to the council IIRC from "Can You Dig It?", so if they do expand it next season, we could be seeing him once again. Perhaps as part of the new "team" on Cybertron.
MrBlack wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing Jazz again, either.
That's a high possibility. Jazz answers directly to the council IIRC from "Can You Dig It?", so if they do expand it next season, we could be seeing him once again. Perhaps as part of the new "team" on Cybertron.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Did season 2 already end? Was Jazz in season 2 also? How many episodes were in season 2?
Comment by Seibertron
May 6, 2016
PrymeStriker wrote:I'm sure CN or someone could cancel the show before this makes it through finalization, but I still sincerely hope there's a season three. I really want them to explore that whole Cybertron council thing that Ratchet hinted at in the finale.MrBlack wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing Jazz again, either.
That's a high possibility. Jazz answers directly to the council IIRC from "Can You Dig It?", so if they do expand it next season, we could be seeing him once again. Perhaps as part of the new "team" on Cybertron.
Did season 2 already end? Was Jazz in season 2 also? How many episodes were in season 2?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Though, with Ms. Zimmer posting about her recording new episodes, surely the episodes set to air this Fall must be done by now, right? Storyboarder Kirk Van Wormer previously Tweeted about working on "Season 4", so this recording session that Zimmer Tweet could very well be for the show's fourth season.
Comment by Sabrblade
May 6, 2016
Season 2 ended in the UK, but Part 1 of its two-part finale will air on Cartoon Network in the U.S. tomorrow morning. Jazz was not in season 2 (but another familiar face is). Season 2 has only 13 episodes. Season 3 will air in the Fall according to an interview TFormers did with Hasbro at BotCon.Seibertron wrote:PrymeStriker wrote:I'm sure CN or someone could cancel the show before this makes it through finalization, but I still sincerely hope there's a season three. I really want them to explore that whole Cybertron council thing that Ratchet hinted at in the finale.MrBlack wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing Jazz again, either.
That's a high possibility. Jazz answers directly to the council IIRC from "Can You Dig It?", so if they do expand it next season, we could be seeing him once again. Perhaps as part of the new "team" on Cybertron.
Did season 2 already end? Was Jazz in season 2 also? How many episodes were in season 2?
Though, with Ms. Zimmer posting about her recording new episodes, surely the episodes set to air this Fall must be done by now, right? Storyboarder Kirk Van Wormer previously Tweeted about working on "Season 4", so this recording session that Zimmer Tweet could very well be for the show's fourth season.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by Deathsanras
May 7, 2016
TV cartoons typically take 9-12 months to produce. When they're not ADR/post dubbed (ala Armada, Energon, Cybertron), the voice recording comes first (per Beast Wars, Beast Machines). If Zimmer is currently or recently recording Strongarm, the implication is that next year a new season (or other incarnation, e.g.: movie) would appear.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
In other words, WOOO, Season 4's coming, guys!
Comment by Sabrblade
May 7, 2016
Yeah, so, the recordings for the Fall episodes should be done by now, so I guess Kirk Van Wormer was serious when he said that he was storyboarding for "Season 4".Deathsanras wrote:TV cartoons typically take 9-12 months to produce. When they're not ADR/post dubbed (ala Armada, Energon, Cybertron), the voice recording comes first (per Beast Wars, Beast Machines). If Zimmer is currently or recently recording Strongarm, the implication is that next year a new season (or other incarnation, e.g.: movie) would appear.
In other words, WOOO, Season 4's coming, guys!

Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Respectfully, I must reply to this deduction with a very modest
HELL YEAH!
Comment by PrymeStriker
May 8, 2016
Sabrblade wrote:Yeah, so, the recordings for the Fall episodes should be done by now, so I guess Kirk Van Wormer was serious when he said that he was storyboarding for "Season 4".Deathsanras wrote:TV cartoons typically take 9-12 months to produce. When they're not ADR/post dubbed (ala Armada, Energon, Cybertron), the voice recording comes first (per Beast Wars, Beast Machines). If Zimmer is currently or recently recording Strongarm, the implication is that next year a new season (or other incarnation, e.g.: movie) would appear.
In other words, WOOO, Season 4's coming, guys!
Respectfully, I must reply to this deduction with a very modest
HELL YEAH!
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by psj333
May 10, 2016
Now that Season 3 has been confirmed for this Fall, will Bumblebee's voice actor, Will Friedle, finally get to voice a Decepticon for the new season? 

Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by Sabrblade
May 10, 2016
What do you mean "finally"? He's already voiced a Decepticon. He voiced Chop Shop's component Righty.psj333 wrote:Now that Season 3 has been confirmed for this Fall, will Bumblebee's voice actor, Will Friedle, finally get to voice a Decepticon for the new season?![]()
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Righty doesn't speak nor he has any dialogue for the role. Also, he is not a Decepticon, but a Minicon. Deal with it!.
Comment by psj333
May 10, 2016
Sabrblade wrote:What do you mean "finally"? He's already voiced a Decepticon. He voiced Chop Shop's component Righty.
Righty doesn't speak nor he has any dialogue for the role. Also, he is not a Decepticon, but a Minicon. Deal with it!.

Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Also, Mini-Cons are faction-aligned. He's a Decepticon, and treated as one by this show.
Also also, what is your source for labeling him a Mini-Con? The show never did that.
Comment by Sabrblade
May 10, 2016
Go watch the show again. He has a voice. He makes noises. Cackling noises. Those were done by Will Friedle. That counts as a voice role. Friedle's even credited for it in the show's end credits. YOU deal with it.psj333 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:What do you mean "finally"? He's already voiced a Decepticon. He voiced Chop Shop's component Righty.
Righty doesn't speak nor he has any dialogue for the role. Also, he is not a Decepticon, but a Minicon. Deal with it!.![]()
Also, Mini-Cons are faction-aligned. He's a Decepticon, and treated as one by this show.
Also also, what is your source for labeling him a Mini-Con? The show never did that.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by D-Maximal_Primal
May 10, 2016
Yeah, chop shop was a combiner decepticon. he was never labelled a minicon 

Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by psj333
May 18, 2016
I'm sure that most of you do already know that the Decepticons for this show have mostly animal robot modes and vehicle modes, while a few of them still do retained their original Beast Wars transformations, that is: humanoid robot modes and beast modes. Which brings me to say that should Hasbro decides to introduce a spy character (excluding Shifters) for Season 3, is it likely that they might possibly introduce a character that has two robot modes, and two alt modes, just like the one in Animated way back in 2008? We all do know that Shockwave or Longarm as he was called by the Autobots has two human robot modes and two vehicle modes. With that said, I was just wondering if they can use this same concept for Robots In Disguise in the near future, mostly likely in Season 3, or quite possibly even in Season 4. Only this time, however, they will most likely introduce a character that has either one human robot mode, one animal robot mode, and one vehicle mode, or even better, that is, two human robot modes, one beast mode, and one vehicle mode? I mean, how cool would that be for a spy character like that in Robots In Disguise for Season 3 and Season 4? What are your thoughts? Why and why not?



Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by Optimum Supreme
May 26, 2016
Are Vehicons the new Seekers? Maybe someday we'll get a bunch of those multicolored Vehicons as new figures... That'd be cool.
Was Grimlock's new disguise supposed to be a reference to the other RiD Grimlock? I know I certainly thought of that guy, even if it's not an exact match.
Was Grimlock's new disguise supposed to be a reference to the other RiD Grimlock? I know I certainly thought of that guy, even if it's not an exact match.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
It was meant to be a reference, yeah. To be fair RiD Grimlock is also the only other Grimlock that's green and speaks in full sentences, so this was just completing the reference it seems.
If by 'new seekers' you mean cannon fodder that come out of nowhere just so the Autobots have something to punch... yeah, I guess so. I doubt we'll get those Vehicons tbh since they played so minor a role - and if they get a new non-redeco figure before friggin' Glowstrike and Saberhorn I just give up.
Comment by Kurona
May 26, 2016
Optimum Supreme wrote:Are Vehicons the new Seekers? Maybe someday we'll get a bunch of those multicolored Vehicons as new figures... That'd be cool.
Was Grimlock's new disguise supposed to be a reference to the other RiD Grimlock? I know I certainly thought of that guy, even if it's not an exact match.
It was meant to be a reference, yeah. To be fair RiD Grimlock is also the only other Grimlock that's green and speaks in full sentences, so this was just completing the reference it seems.
If by 'new seekers' you mean cannon fodder that come out of nowhere just so the Autobots have something to punch... yeah, I guess so. I doubt we'll get those Vehicons tbh since they played so minor a role - and if they get a new non-redeco figure before friggin' Glowstrike and Saberhorn I just give up.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by WiseMan
Jun 7, 2016
So I saw the first part of Decepticon Island.
Here's my big, GIANT problem with it:
The Autobots mention that they don't have time to call Cybertron and get a strike team there in time to help them. I've always hated the fact that they've completely ignored Unit E's space bridge, but this was the last straw. Optimus, Bumblebee, and Ratchet are all there and they've all used it! And it would literally do exactly what they just said couldn't be done! Ratchet's appearance gave them the perfect chance to explain what happened to it; they could have one-lined it away with a "too bad Unit E's space bridge was dismantled" or something, and they didn't do it.
Don't get me wrong, I like the show, but the only way I can watch it is as a sequel to events that happened similar to, but not exactly like, Prime, the same way you have to look at the Aligned books, comics, and games. Because otherwise, if you take RiD as a direct sequel to Prime, the way it's billed, Unicron could fit through the plot holes.
Here's my big, GIANT problem with it:
The Autobots mention that they don't have time to call Cybertron and get a strike team there in time to help them. I've always hated the fact that they've completely ignored Unit E's space bridge, but this was the last straw. Optimus, Bumblebee, and Ratchet are all there and they've all used it! And it would literally do exactly what they just said couldn't be done! Ratchet's appearance gave them the perfect chance to explain what happened to it; they could have one-lined it away with a "too bad Unit E's space bridge was dismantled" or something, and they didn't do it.
Don't get me wrong, I like the show, but the only way I can watch it is as a sequel to events that happened similar to, but not exactly like, Prime, the same way you have to look at the Aligned books, comics, and games. Because otherwise, if you take RiD as a direct sequel to Prime, the way it's billed, Unicron could fit through the plot holes.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
We don't know how much time has passed on Earth between Prime and RiD. Both Bumblebee and Ratchet have considerably aged since the previous series, and there certainly had to be time for Cybertron to massively repopulate the way it did by the time of Pilot (Part 1), let-alone for Strongarm, Sideswipe, and the Minicons to be born and for a new council to be established. That stuff just doesn't happen overnight. Unit: E could be roof-deep in sand and Jack, Miko, and Raf could be long dead.
Comment by PrymeStriker
Jun 7, 2016
WiseMan wrote:So I saw the first part of Decepticon Island.
Here's my big, GIANT problem with it:
The Autobots mention that they don't have time to call Cybertron and get a strike team there in time to help them. I've always hated the fact that they've completely ignored Unit E's space bridge, but this was the last straw. Optimus, Bumblebee, and Ratchet are all there and they've all used it! And it would literally do exactly what they just said couldn't be done! Ratchet's appearance gave them the perfect chance to explain what happened to it; they could have one-lined it away with a "too bad Unit E's space bridge was dismantled" or something, and they didn't do it.
Don't get me wrong, I like the show, but the only way I can watch it is as a sequel to events that happened similar to, but not exactly like, Prime, the same way you have to look at the Aligned books, comics, and games. Because otherwise, if you take RiD as a direct sequel to Prime, the way it's billed, Unicron could fit through the plot holes.
We don't know how much time has passed on Earth between Prime and RiD. Both Bumblebee and Ratchet have considerably aged since the previous series, and there certainly had to be time for Cybertron to massively repopulate the way it did by the time of Pilot (Part 1), let-alone for Strongarm, Sideswipe, and the Minicons to be born and for a new council to be established. That stuff just doesn't happen overnight. Unit: E could be roof-deep in sand and Jack, Miko, and Raf could be long dead.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Comment by Kurona
Jun 7, 2016
>when you want to read but your phone won't let you highlight the spoiler tag
I think it was stated 10 years had passed. If the question was about "why don't they just call unit:e/fowler/etc."... That's a bit of a problem I've had with the series as a whole. The criticism can be applied the momemt Bumblebee stepped on Earth in Pilot Part 1.
I think it was stated 10 years had passed. If the question was about "why don't they just call unit:e/fowler/etc."... That's a bit of a problem I've had with the series as a whole. The criticism can be applied the momemt Bumblebee stepped on Earth in Pilot Part 1.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
I'd like to see a source for that, honestly. Because every official announcement regarding the series I've ever seen has given a vague time period like "years after" or "set some time after the events of". The Unicron Trilogy set each of their shows 10 years after the last, but this isn't Energon.
Also, I'd honestly be shocked and disturbed that Strongarm is 10 years old, or younger.
Comment by PrymeStriker
Jun 7, 2016
Kurona wrote:>when you want to read but your phone won't let you highlight the spoiler tag
I think it was stated 10 years had passed. If the question was about "why don't they just call unit:e/fowler/etc."... That's a bit of a problem I've had with the series as a whole. The criticism can be applied the momemt Bumblebee stepped on Earth in Pilot Part 1.
I'd like to see a source for that, honestly. Because every official announcement regarding the series I've ever seen has given a vague time period like "years after" or "set some time after the events of". The Unicron Trilogy set each of their shows 10 years after the last, but this isn't Energon.
Also, I'd honestly be shocked and disturbed that Strongarm is 10 years old, or younger.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
Cybertron would have been repopulated seconds after the ending of Predacons Rising; otherwise all of those sparks would have just died. Though it would have take time to rebuild Cybertron.
And call me crazy, but if I had an artifact like the space bridge that was my only hope to save myself against an alien incursion like the one that just happened, I'd be pretty damn sure to make sure it doesn't get lost.
Comment by WiseMan
Jun 7, 2016
PrymeStriker wrote:We don't know how much time has passed on Earth between Prime and RiD. Both Bumblebee and Ratchet have considerably aged since the previous series, and there certainly had to be time for Cybertron to massively repopulate the way it did by the time of Pilot (Part 1), let-alone for Strongarm, Sideswipe, and the Minicons to be born and for a new council to be established. That stuff just doesn't happen overnight. Unit: E could be roof-deep in sand and Jack, Miko, and Raf could be long dead.
Cybertron would have been repopulated seconds after the ending of Predacons Rising; otherwise all of those sparks would have just died. Though it would have take time to rebuild Cybertron.
And call me crazy, but if I had an artifact like the space bridge that was my only hope to save myself against an alien incursion like the one that just happened, I'd be pretty damn sure to make sure it doesn't get lost.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise: Constance Zimmer Potentially Confirms Season 3
(view post)
I mean, that sort of thing happens all thr time in Transformers and no-one blinks an eye - probably because they're robots.
The dinobots, stunticons and quite a few others back in G1, Airazor was implied in Beast Wars; eveb as recent as Wreck-Gar and the Constructicons in Animated.
It's really nothing new. It sounds and feels weird sure, but likely because it's the first time you've really actually thought and stated to yourself "... Wait, that would make her ten years old."
In any case, I'm not actually sure if it is ten years, was just going by memory. I don't really think it was enough time for Raf to have lived his whole life though, and you'd think something on the subject would have been said by now.
Comment by Kurona
Jun 7, 2016
PrymeStriker wrote:Also, I'd honestly be shocked and disturbed that Strongarm is 10 years old, or younger.
I mean, that sort of thing happens all thr time in Transformers and no-one blinks an eye - probably because they're robots.
The dinobots, stunticons and quite a few others back in G1, Airazor was implied in Beast Wars; eveb as recent as Wreck-Gar and the Constructicons in Animated.
It's really nothing new. It sounds and feels weird sure, but likely because it's the first time you've really actually thought and stated to yourself "... Wait, that would make her ten years old."
In any case, I'm not actually sure if it is ten years, was just going by memory. I don't really think it was enough time for Raf to have lived his whole life though, and you'd think something on the subject would have been said by now.