Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Metro Prime wrote:I don't know if anyone's suggested this already, but how about Gareth Edwards? He did a pretty good job with the new Godzilla movie.
Metro Prime wrote:I don't know if anyone's suggested this already, but how about Gareth Edwards? He did a pretty good job with the new Godzilla movie.
Sub-Prime wrote:it should've done around 350-400 million in the states.
Rodimus Prime wrote:You can't make me disappear. I am not feet.
Burn wrote:Darkman20xx wrote:First off I want to see these movies do well because I would love to see Transformers become an ongoing thing for decades sort of like the Star Trek and Bond movies. That's not going to happen if the movies go any further downhill then they've already gone.
Transformers - $709,709,780
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - $836,303,693
Transformers: Dark of the Moon - $1,123,794,079
Transformers: Age of Extinction- $754,044,938 (still in cinemas)
Yeah ... not really going downhill by those figures.
Or were you talking about quality? Yeah ... that's just your opinion and at the end of the day movie sequels tend to be decided on money, not the opinion of dedicated fans.
OptimalOptimus2 wrote:I really hope if there is an actual new director for Transformers 5 and realize the major flaws in the Michael Bay movies. Does anyone have a director in mind that they would love to see their work in a Transformers movie? Mine is J.J. Abrams.
Uwe Boll and Tommy Wisseau.SEXFIGHTER wrote:OptimalOptimus2 wrote:I really hope if there is an actual new director for Transformers 5 and realize the major flaws in the Michael Bay movies. Does anyone have a director in mind that they would love to see their work in a Transformers movie? Mine is J.J. Abrams.
My friend I would literaaly take ANYONE at this point
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
SEXFIGHTER wrote:Burn wrote:Darkman20xx wrote:First off I want to see these movies do well because I would love to see Transformers become an ongoing thing for decades sort of like the Star Trek and Bond movies. That's not going to happen if the movies go any further downhill then they've already gone.
Transformers - $709,709,780
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - $836,303,693
Transformers: Dark of the Moon - $1,123,794,079
Transformers: Age of Extinction- $754,044,938 (still in cinemas)
Yeah ... not really going downhill by those figures.
Or were you talking about quality? Yeah ... that's just your opinion and at the end of the day movie sequels tend to be decided on money, not the opinion of dedicated fans.
The Spice Girls sold more albums than your average underground, progressive rock bands. It does not make those albums of any artistic merit. Can we have a Transformers film with a bit of class and still make money? Of course. Opinions are entirely subjective, however, I have had enough of people defending the raping of the Transformers by a buffoon of a director. Nobody can SERIOUSLY defend these films?? They have good scenes, Great scenes sometimes, however the scripts are abhorrent...Why are so many people happy to have ANY Transformers film rather than a good one, or a great one?
SEXFIGHTER wrote:Burn wrote:Darkman20xx wrote:First off I want to see these movies do well because I would love to see Transformers become an ongoing thing for decades sort of like the Star Trek and Bond movies. That's not going to happen if the movies go any further downhill then they've already gone.
Transformers - $709,709,780
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - $836,303,693
Transformers: Dark of the Moon - $1,123,794,079
Transformers: Age of Extinction- $754,044,938 (still in cinemas)
Yeah ... not really going downhill by those figures.
Or were you talking about quality? Yeah ... that's just your opinion and at the end of the day movie sequels tend to be decided on money, not the opinion of dedicated fans.
The Spice Girls sold more albums than your average underground, progressive rock bands. It does not make those albums of any artistic merit. Can we have a Transformers film with a bit of class and still make money? Of course. Opinions are entirely subjective, however, I have had enough of people defending the raping of the Transformers by a buffoon of a director. Nobody can SERIOUSLY defend these films?? They have good scenes, Great scenes sometimes, however the scripts are abhorrent...Why are so many people happy to have ANY Transformers film rather than a good one, or a great one?
Sub-Prime wrote:Also nobody gives Bay credit for anything. Thanks to him we found out that Transformers have a Cybertronian language in which no cartoon has ever talked about. He also made it where mass shifting made more sense than G1(I'm looking at you Soundwave and Megatron). Bumblebee is more bad ass than any other version of himself. I could go on but the negative folks probably won't care about the good he brought. So let's just concentrate on the negative shall we?
Ahem - http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Cybertronian_languageSub-Prime wrote:Also nobody gives Bay credit for anything. Thanks to him we found out that Transformers have a Cybertronian language in which no cartoon has ever talked about.
Dreamwave and IDW did it first - http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Size_changing#ExplanationsSub-Prime wrote:He also made it where mass shifting made more sense than G1(I'm looking at you Soundwave and Megatron).
Should that really matter, though? Why does he need to be?Sub-Prime wrote:Bumblebee is more bad ass than any other version of himself.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
SEXFIGHTER wrote:Burn wrote:Darkman20xx wrote:First off I want to see these movies do well because I would love to see Transformers become an ongoing thing for decades sort of like the Star Trek and Bond movies. That's not going to happen if the movies go any further downhill then they've already gone.
Transformers - $709,709,780
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - $836,303,693
Transformers: Dark of the Moon - $1,123,794,079
Transformers: Age of Extinction- $754,044,938 (still in cinemas)
Yeah ... not really going downhill by those figures.
Or were you talking about quality? Yeah ... that's just your opinion and at the end of the day movie sequels tend to be decided on money, not the opinion of dedicated fans.
The Spice Girls sold more albums than your average underground, progressive rock bands. It does not make those albums of any artistic merit. Can we have a Transformers film with a bit of class and still make money? Of course. Opinions are entirely subjective, however, I have had enough of people defending the raping of the Transformers by a buffoon of a director. Nobody can SERIOUSLY defend these films?? They have good scenes, Great scenes sometimes, however the scripts are abhorrent...Why are so many people happy to have ANY Transformers film rather than a good one, or a great one?
And I ask again, why should that matter at all?SlyTF1 wrote:Optimus is also more badass than he's ever been.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:And I ask again, why should that matter at all?SlyTF1 wrote:Optimus is also more badass than he's ever been.
And why would that matter?SlyTF1 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:And I ask again, why should that matter at all?SlyTF1 wrote:Optimus is also more badass than he's ever been.
So I can spend my time wishing I was as badass as him.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:And why would that matter?SlyTF1 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:And I ask again, why should that matter at all?SlyTF1 wrote:Optimus is also more badass than he's ever been.
So I can spend my time wishing I was as badass as him.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Nemesis Destron, Quautobot, Sabrblade, Yahoo [Bot]