The Energon Pub

News Credits: 730 · by **Raymond T.** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:59 am

83457W422102 wrote:Man, Cy-Kill can never catch break, can he?

Actually, I'd say Cy-Kill gets a lot of breaks. On his arms, his legs, his chest...

Josh wrote:
Hans wrote:That's the evil handywork of the colorist. Guido did his job well

(Colorists have the logos on file. No artist actually draws them anymore).
actually guido does the colors on his concepts so xD

*Point at Hans*

Ha-ha!

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:10 am

This all looks really good to me. I can't wait for the Galvatron spotlight.

I like the IDW redesigns thus far, and most of them have been necessary given the context of IDW's continuity, however this Galvatron art shows that he doesn't need to be touched and why.

News Credits: 23 · by **1337W422102** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:18 am

Raymond T. wrote:
83457W422102 wrote:Man, Cy-Kill can never catch break, can he?
Actually, I'd say Cy-Kill gets a lot of breaks. On his arms, his legs, his chest...

I wasn't saying I think he should live, I was just saying that he gets owned a lot.

News Credits: 1 · by **the_dark_decepticon** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:03 am

For those of you asking where is Galvatron's Decepticon symbol, you need to read the interview with Furman about the Galvatron Spotlight. Galvatron doesn't have a Decepticon symbol because the storyline in his Spotlight has him not being a reborn Megatron and predating the TF's Civil War/Great War. With the storyline predating the TF Civil War there are no Decepticons yet. Therefore Galvatron can't have a Decepticon symbol.

News Credits: 8 · by **Hans** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:03 pm

Josh wrote:
Hans wrote:That's the evil handywork of the colorist. Guido did his job well

(Colorists have the logos on file. No artist actually draws them anymore).

actually guido does the colors on his concepts so xD

Are you doing the colors on this one Josh?

I hope so

News Credits: 730 · by **Raymond T.** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:50 pm

83457W422102 wrote:I was just saying that he gets owned a lot.

Yeah, but that because no one in his right mind wants to own a Go-bot! So he ends up being given away alot.

News Credits: 335 · by **Down_Shift** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:56 pm

Raymond T. wrote:
83457W422102 wrote:I was just saying that he gets owned a lot.
Yeah, but that because no one in his right mind wants to own a Go-bot! So he ends up being given away alot.

Ooo good pun Raymond. Excellent play on words. :APPLAUSE:

News Credits: 730 · by **Raymond T.** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:59 pm

Down_Shift wrote:
Raymond T. wrote:
83457W422102 wrote:I was just saying that he gets owned a lot.
Yeah, but that because no one in his right mind wants to own a Go-bot! So he ends up being given away alot.
Ooo good pun Raymond. Excellent play on words.

*Takes a bow*

News Credits: 30 · by **Josh** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:36 pm

Leonardo wrote:This all looks really good to me. I can't wait for the Galvatron spotlight.

I like the IDW redesigns thus far, and most of them have been necessary given the context of IDW's continuity, however this Galvatron art shows that he doesn't need to be touched and why.

well i think it was said in one of these interview/panel thingies

but the galvatron you see here is quite "simplified" compared to what i've seen

hes much pointier and badass looking xD

News Credits: 2024 · by **Hotrod** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:39 pm

Josh wrote:
Leonardo wrote:This all looks really good to me. I can't wait for the Galvatron spotlight.

I like the IDW redesigns thus far, and most of them have been necessary given the context of IDW's continuity, however this Galvatron art shows that he doesn't need to be touched and why.

well i think it was said in one of these interview/panel thingies

but the galvatron you see here is quite "simplified" compared to what i've seen

hes much pointier and badass looking xD

I can not wait to see Galvatron now.

News Credits: 335 · by **Down_Shift** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:41 am

I for one have been let down by the IDW art. Not that I think EJ is lacking, it's just not to my taste. Think of that as constructive criticism more then it is my over all distaste for his art. Stormbring to me was fantastic, while the Hotrod Spotlight was far under par to me. The UM spotlight was good, not great but good and so was sixshot. The Kup spotlight doesn't look like my "kup"-o-tea, but to others it may look amazing. Pardon my french, but to me, not a whole lot can hold a candle to Pats DW designs. (of course I know I'm the lone wolf on this one. :wink:

). Milne is a rediculously amazing artist and meeting him and talking to him face to face I can only expect awsome things out of the megatron and galvatron spotlights.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:51 am

Josh wrote:
Leonardo wrote:This all looks really good to me. I can't wait for the Galvatron spotlight.

I like the IDW redesigns thus far, and most of them have been necessary given the context of IDW's continuity, however this Galvatron art shows that he doesn't need to be touched and why.

well i think it was said in one of these interview/panel thingies

but the galvatron you see here is quite "simplified" compared to what i've seen

hes much pointier and badass looking xD

Then I'm looking forward to it even more.

News Credits: 20 · by **Neko** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:54 pm

When's the next installment of Transformers coming out? (sequal to Escalation). I cant recall the name...

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:37 am

Devastation? I believe it's after the Megatron origin, which I think is a four-parter. So I'd guess September/October time.

News Credits: 2 · by **Insurgent** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:03 pm

I think they do a 6 parter of the main arc on Earth, then a 4 parter suppliment to the saga, then another 6 parter. That appears to be the trend they set. Next one is Devastation and after that is Revelations.