The Energon Pub

by **Quadrajet** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:04 pm

Here's a link to the auction - no more red eyes!
http://cgi.ebay.com/Transformers-Classi ... dZViewItem

News Credits: 2 · by **Basketball Jones** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:54 pm

In the pictures, they still seem red.

by **Quadrajet** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:38 pm

Dino eyes - not the bot eye.

News Credits: 1 · by **bookofjunon** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:40 am

Looks stupid without the red eyes. You should have replaced the red with something else, simply removing them makes it look like a broken toy.

by **Kalon** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:10 pm

bookofjunon wrote:Looks stupid without the red eyes. You should have replaced the red with something else, simply removing them makes it look like a broken toy.

Quoted for truth

News Credits: 104 · by **Cyber Bishop** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:34 pm

It does not look right without the dino eyes.

by **Dagon** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:23 pm

Kalon wrote:
bookofjunon wrote:Looks stupid without the red eyes. You should have replaced the red with something else, simply removing them makes it look like a broken toy.

Quoted for truth

I thought the same thing. Since when does breaking something count as customizing?

by **Mighty Scorponok** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:42 pm

Breaking something is ok, as long as its replaced by something else and looks good would count as customizing, but removing something does not count, in my book anyway. I am sure tons of people would agree with me.

News Credits: 5 · by **zodconvoy** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:48 pm

He broke it, pure and simple. If he wanted to call it customized, he should've at least made the eyes blue.

News Credits: 1 · by **bookofjunon** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:40 pm

zodconvoy wrote:He broke it, pure and simple. If he wanted to call it customized, he should've at least made the eyes blue.

QFT

by **Dagon** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:24 pm

bookofjunon wrote:
zodconvoy wrote:He broke it, pure and simple. If he wanted to call it customized, he should've at least made the eyes blue.

QFT

That's funny.

by **E107_Theta** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:09 pm

lol, didn't sell.

News Credits: 5 · by **God Magnus** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:44 pm

E107_Theta wrote:lol, didn't sell.

And then he listed a loose complete one shortly thereafter. Hmm... :-?

News Credits: 20 · by **Chosen** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:40 pm

God Magnus wrote:
E107_Theta wrote:lol, didn't sell.

And then he listed a loose complete one shortly thereafter. Hmm...

The eyes are clearly there in the new picture. He must have realized his "custom" was undesirable and replaced it. Assuming those parts were indeed carefully removed, it should be find now.