Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Seibertron wrote:Yah the chest is just awkward. I'd rather him look better in robot mode than vehicle mode. I think for most of us, he'll be in robot mode anyways on display.
It would make sense since that'd be the 40th anniversary of the 1986 movie.Burn wrote:Anyone wanna bet my stinky Whirl he gets revisited AGAIN within 10 years?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Seibertron wrote:Yah the chest is just awkward. I'd rather him look better in robot mode than vehicle mode. I think for most of us, he'll be in robot mode anyways on display.
Thing is, though, Hot Rod and all of the other new movie characters (minus Ultra Magnus and maybe one or two others) had their animation models made first, with their toys coming second and being based on the animation models. So you can't fault Hot Rod's cartoon model for simplifying the toy's design simply because the opposite was true. The toy failed to capture the cartoon look, rather than the other way around.Cobotron wrote:See, this is good case of why I've never been a fan of the G1 cartoon or G1 toon accuracy in the toys. The cartoon models were crummy approximations full of cheats and trickery so they could pump out those shows on a low budget. I saw it when I was 9, and I see it now. They streamlined and simplified important kibble () that, in toy form were some of the most interesting and defining aesthetics of the characters.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Thing is, though, Hot Rod and all of the other new movie characters (minus Ultra Magnus and maybe one or two others) had their animation models made first, with their toys coming second and being based on the animation models. So you can't fault Hot Rod's cartoon model for simplifying the toy's design simply because the opposite was true. The toy failed to capture the cartoon look, rather than the other way around.Cobotron wrote:See, this is good case of why I've never been a fan of the G1 cartoon or G1 toon accuracy in the toys. The cartoon models were crummy approximations full of cheats and trickery so they could pump out those shows on a low budget. I saw it when I was 9, and I see it now. They streamlined and simplified important kibble () that, in toy form were some of the most interesting and defining aesthetics of the characters.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Doctor McGrath wrote:Seibertron wrote:Yah the chest is just awkward. I'd rather him look better in robot mode than vehicle mode. I think for most of us, he'll be in robot mode anyways on display.
For sure. Maybe the chest will look less awkward in hand like MP Sideswipe? The lack of angles just doesn't play well for Hot Rod's chest.
This would truly make for a masterpiece. The blending of both mediums to make the best version of any given character.Seibertron wrote:Use the G1 toy and the G1 cartoon model sheets as a guide, not the rule. Get them close, refer to the G1 toy when the cartoon just is too simplistic. Use the detail from the G1 toys.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Seibertron wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:Seibertron wrote:Yah the chest is just awkward. I'd rather him look better in robot mode than vehicle mode. I think for most of us, he'll be in robot mode anyways on display.
For sure. Maybe the chest will look less awkward in hand like MP Sideswipe? The lack of angles just doesn't play well for Hot Rod's chest.
Perhaps. Time will tell.
I also wanted to add that if they weren't going to do Hot Rod right, then why do him again after just 6 years? I didn't want another Hot Rod with a different set of flaws (albeit these ones are more aesthetic instead of functional) to make up for the last one.
But if the MPs weren't trying to be so faithful to the cartoon designs, then wouldn't that just make the line be a bunch of giant-sized Classics-style figures (and much more like what several of the 3rd party MPs resemble)? What would be the point of them if they were done that way when people could just buy the Classics/Generations toys and get the same variety of toy for less?Seibertron wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:Seibertron wrote:Yah the chest is just awkward. I'd rather him look better in robot mode than vehicle mode. I think for most of us, he'll be in robot mode anyways on display.
For sure. Maybe the chest will look less awkward in hand like MP Sideswipe? The lack of angles just doesn't play well for Hot Rod's chest.
Perhaps. Time will tell.
I also wanted to add that if they weren't going to do Hot Rod right, then why do him again after just 6 years? I didn't want another Hot Rod with a different set of flaws (albeit these ones are more aesthetic instead of functional) to make up for the last one.
I also agree with some of the statements above regarding the cartoon style for the Masterpiece figures. I really wish they'd get rid of that rule. Use the G1 toy and the G1 cartoon model sheets as a guide, not the rule. Get them close, refer to the G1 toy when the cartoon just is too simplistic. Use the detail from the G1 toys. Ultra Magnus looks pretty good but he's missing so much of the detail that he should have had and is too simplistic because they went for the cartoon look too much.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Found this new comparison someone made elsewhere.
Left: MP-9
Right: MP-28
Center: Size-corrected MP-28 with very improved proportions (bigger head, waist, and legs)
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
fenrir72 wrote:http://www.amiami.com/top/detail/review?scode=FIGURE-014210&page=top
fave pic
fenrir72 wrote:http://www.amiami.com/top/detail/review?scode=FIGURE-014210&page=top
fave pic
Nemesis Destron wrote:Yeah okay a fishing pole right, guess he'll be FISHING for compliments for leadership right? Cause he's got that fishing pole you know, so he could fish. Fish for that and umm, you know other things too right? -crickets-![]()
I guess thebetter watch out now with this pole in Hot Rod arsenal huh, right? I wonder what he'll use for bate? -crickets-
![]()
Hot Rod wasn't a Targetmaster user in Japan. Rodimus Prime, Blurr, and Kup were gone before they showed up in Transformers: Headmasters.procyon wrote:What... no Firebolt? Where's the Targetmaster love?
william-james88 wrote:I dont care for the sacrifice made so that Prime's matrix fits in his chest.
Nemesis Destron wrote:Yeah okay a fishing pole right, guess he'll be FISHING for compliments for leadership right? Cause he's got that fishing pole you know, so he could fish. Fish for that and umm, you know other things too right? -crickets-![]()
I guess thebetter watch out now with this pole in Hot Rod arsenal huh, right? I wonder what he'll use for bate? -crickets-
![]()
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Grahf_, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, Till-all-R1, william-james88, Yahoo [Bot]