Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Editor wrote:Our lovely rainbow of monetary units can be seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_currency.
just as our secondary currence can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Tire_money.
See the colours. the ColoUrs! Look, Takara we use red too.
shonenfan4 wrote:The box once agains looks the same except the ROTF Takara Sticker. Am I the only one here more intersted in how the cashier/employee holding the boxes looks like?
Seibertron wrote:
Seibertron.com is a Transformers fansite. It is not a fansite about 3rd party products. I do NOT care for 3rd party products. I am TIRED of seeing the stuff here on this site. That's all it comes down to.
Pontimax 01 wrote:shonenfan4 wrote:The box once agains looks the same except the ROTF Takara Sticker. Am I the only one here more intersted in how the cashier/employee holding the boxes looks like?
Oh she looks like a cutie. Asian/Japanese chicks are hooot.
shonenfan4 wrote:The box once agains looks the same except the ROTF Takara Sticker. Am I the only one here more intersted in how the cashier/employee holding the boxes looks like?
Convotron wrote:Hehe, it's good to see that despite being addicted to plastic crack, the guys have proper priorities. Ladies first.
While the red on the head sculpt is more screen accurate, I like the Hasbro all-grey face Supreme Devastator.
Diem wrote:Razorclaw0000 wrote:Diem wrote:Torneira wrote:I don't know what to think of those bunny ears on devastator's head... He looks like he has a rabbitface to me. All he misses are 2 long teeth out of his mouth LoL
28 days... 6 hours... 42 minutes... 12 seconds. That... is when the world... will end.
Nah, this is just Tangent Universe Devastator.
"It takes a large metal object falling to change time to the presupposed line. Like a jet engine. Or Devastator's balls."
shonenfan4 wrote:Convotron wrote:Hehe, it's good to see that despite being addicted to plastic crack, the guys have proper priorities. Ladies first.
While the red on the head sculpt is more screen accurate, I like the Hasbro all-grey face Supreme Devastator.
I love the Hasbro Supreme Devastator simply because of its price compared to the Takara one.
tom brokaw wrote:eh, the red face doesnt make this any better than the hasbro version
agent1159 wrote:tom brokaw wrote:eh, the red face doesnt make this any better than the hasbro version
+1000000000000000000
still looks like ass... the face, it's top heavy, was a "pet drone" in the movie.... on and on and on
instead of a repaint of a bad mold/character, can they instead go back a few years and never come up with this craptastic ruin of a great character
Convotron wrote:I like RotF Devastator overall. My main criticism of the Supreme class toy is that it's not a proper combiner.
shonenfan4 wrote:Convotron wrote:I like RotF Devastator overall. My main criticism of the Supreme class toy is that it's not a proper combiner.
Is it bc it's lacking individual robot modes for the components?
Convotron wrote:shonenfan4 wrote:Convotron wrote:I like RotF Devastator overall. My main criticism of the Supreme class toy is that it's not a proper combiner.
Is it bc it's lacking individual robot modes for the components?
Yup. I assume part of the reason for Supreme Devastator's mechanical design is because the sheer mass of its combined form likely requires specialized parts for support rather than normal figures-that-turn-into-bodyparts.
So I understand the resulting design of Supreme Devastator but to me, some of the fun of a combiner is the individual robots. When I look at combiner sets, I look at it as getting twice the amount of toys as there are individual figures(alt+bot modes) plus 1(the combined form). There's so much potential for display and play with that amount of options. It's why I would rather have the EZ Collection Devastator set rather than the Supreme version.
Convotron wrote:shonenfan4 wrote:Convotron wrote:I like RotF Devastator overall. My main criticism of the Supreme class toy is that it's not a proper combiner.
Is it bc it's lacking individual robot modes for the components?
Yup. I assume part of the reason for Supreme Devastator's mechanical design is because the sheer mass of its combined form likely requires specialized parts for support rather than normal figures-that-turn-into-bodyparts.
So I understand the resulting design of Supreme Devastator but to me, some of the fun of a combiner is the individual robots. When I look at combiner sets, I look at it as getting twice the amount of toys as there are individual figures(alt+bot modes) plus 1(the combined form). There's so much potential for display and play with that amount of options. It's why I would rather have the EZ Collection Devastator set rather than the Supreme version.
Dinobot Prime wrote:Convotron wrote:shonenfan4 wrote:Convotron wrote:I like RotF Devastator overall. My main criticism of the Supreme class toy is that it's not a proper combiner.
Is it bc it's lacking individual robot modes for the components?
Yup. I assume part of the reason for Supreme Devastator's mechanical design is because the sheer mass of its combined form likely requires specialized parts for support rather than normal figures-that-turn-into-bodyparts.
So I understand the resulting design of Supreme Devastator but to me, some of the fun of a combiner is the individual robots. When I look at combiner sets, I look at it as getting twice the amount of toys as there are individual figures(alt+bot modes) plus 1(the combined form). There's so much potential for display and play with that amount of options. It's why I would rather have the EZ Collection Devastator set rather than the Supreme version.
Also, y'know, it's movie accuracy. For a bunch of people that are always complaining that the figures aren't movie-accurate, you all sure seem to overlook when it actually is. In the movie (if I recall correctly, which I think I do) there were two sets of constructicons. One that went vehicle-to-Devastator, and another that went vehicle-to-individual-robots. That's why we don't have individual figures for each of the seperate constructicons, because they weren't all there in the movie. Only Long Haul, Mixmaster, that jackhammer one whose name I forget, and the steamshovel whose name I forget were actually there.
Same thing goes for the Jazz figure from the first movie. When you think about it, his weapon was one of the most screen-accurate ones. Instead of holding his gun like a G1 figure would've, his was part of his arm, much like it was in the movie.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot]