The Energon Pub

well, I read only a few paragraphs to make a dessision that this guy who wrote is is eather a 16-year old failing 12th grade english, a strung-out college student or a Retard. Neetless to say my brain turned to mush at one point and I could not continue reading. But the enthusiasm really did get my attention overall, so it's a sign that this movie will be very good, so i'll give him a D+ for enthusiasm of the subject.

I think he might be the real thing but doesn't want to add too many spoilers we don't already know about. Or perhaps it's a scam. Either way reading it got me even more excited about it.

Bay said that it was test footage and that it wasn't Cullen's voice, that he wouldn't have lips in the film.

Show me where Bay said that there would be no lips in the movie, because nothing I have read said otherwise. THe update from bay said it was not cullens voice. I seriously dont know where people see things between the lines and all of a sudden it turns into "omg prime really isnt going to have lips in the movie.

1Big\"F\"ingRayOfSunshine wrote:

Bay said that it was test footage and that it wasn't Cullen's voice, that he wouldn't have lips in the film.

Show me where Bay said that there would be no lips in the movie, because nothing I have read said otherwise. THe update from bay said it was not cullens voice. I seriously dont know where people see things between the lines and all of a sudden it turns into "omg prime really isnt going to have lips in the movie.

You're right, it was a typo on my part. I went back to edit to remove that he doesn't say it isn't the final model (which I thought was implied but on second reading wasn't) and accidentally backspaced the 'not' in front of 'that he wouldn't have lips in the film'.... which is why I was responding to the quoted post in the first place. It was late.

If he said only one thing with a lots od details like Megatron kicks Prime, pics up two cars and hits him three more times or something like that...I would belive. One spoiler would not meen nothing.

And when I'm saying how he acts. I didn't mean in a sense how he is I meant in a way he write that damn review. Imagine every male from gamespot or ign would review a game and when there is a girl in it he would say like '' Oh yeah baby. Those breast were perfect! Ah yeah screw the game I live the breasts. And a butt!? Superb man makes me wanna stick a ....'' you get the idea.

Pure BS. If this is a real review I'm Elvis. Maybe this is a 28-year-old hired by a sly PR firm to imitate an excited 14-year-old to get people pumped about the movie?

Mechanurgist wrote:Pure BS. If this is a real review I'm Elvis. Maybe this is a 28-year-old hired by a sly PR firm to imitate an excited 14-year-old to get people pumped about the movie?

In that case, they made a bad choice. If they REALLY hired someone to do that, then... I'm more worried of the movie's quality than ever before

"Megan Fox (im sure that's no coincidence), I have no clue if she can act or not because I was fixated on her tits and ass whenever she was onscreen - pure sex (god bless you Michael Bay). I had to IMDB her after the movie because I had no idea who she is or what she had been in. I didn't care then and I don't care now."

I hate ignorant misogynist crap like this, talking about women as if they're nothing more than sexual objects, what a **** loser.

Phenotype wrote:"Megan Fox (im sure that's no coincidence), I have no clue if she can act or not because I was fixated on her tits and ass whenever she was onscreen - pure sex (god bless you Michael Bay). I had to IMDB her after the movie because I had no idea who she is or what she had been in. I didn't care then and I don't care now."

I hate ignorant misogynist crap like this, talking about women as if they're nothing more than sexual objects, what a **** loser.

I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment.

I'd like to know, purely from an interest as to how Hollywood screenwriting works, whether Orci and Kurtzman deliberately scripted Mikaela to be an object of lust as she will inevitably be, or if she was originally drafted as a fully-realised character in her own right.

Phenotype wrote:
I hate ignorant misogynist crap like this, talking about women as if they're nothing more than sexual objects, what a **** loser.

Know what pisses me off? When women put their tits and asses on display, then get offended when men stare at them and what not.

If you don't want to be treated like a sex object, start bitching at all teh women who play on in movies and on tv and what not.

Ironhidensh wrote:If you don't want to be treated like a sex object, start bitching at all teh women who play on in movies and on tv and what not.

I do. True story. It's like people complain about pornography, then they'll go into a stationery shop and buy their eight year old daughter a set of Playboy stationery.

Hey guys I heard there is a another review by a kid over at IMDB.com I haven't verified yet so none of that front paged or crediting stuff if you guys find it.

Phenotype wrote:"Megan Fox (im sure that's no coincidence), I have no clue if she can act or not because I was fixated on her tits and ass whenever she was onscreen - pure sex (god bless you Michael Bay). I had to IMDB her after the movie because I had no idea who she is or what she had been in. I didn't care then and I don't care now."

I hate ignorant misogynist crap like this, talking about women as if they're nothing more than sexual objects, what a **** loser.

Yeah right... well no offense but I like to see some T&A on the screen if you're good looking. The fatty's can off on Jerry Springer