Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Counterpunch wrote:FP sure does provide some F'd up head.
Archanubis wrote:Ultimately, in my opinion, it was three months on a scene that probably should have been cut from the script before it was even filmed.
RiddlerJ wrote:"However, it was one of those scenes that just jumped off the screen, and one people won't forget"
I'm sure Bay thought that back when he was watching The Terminator.
Delicon wrote:RiddlerJ wrote:"However, it was one of those scenes that just jumped off the screen, and one people won't forget"
I'm sure Bay thought that back when he was watching The Terminator.
I'm not sure who came up with the idea to put that in this movie, but the "pretender" concept has been one used in Transformers for a whopping 21 years.
Of course visually in this movie I can see why you would think that, though.
RiddlerJ wrote:Delicon wrote:RiddlerJ wrote:"However, it was one of those scenes that just jumped off the screen, and one people won't forget"
I'm sure Bay thought that back when he was watching The Terminator.
I'm not sure who came up with the idea to put that in this movie, but the "pretender" concept has been one used in Transformers for a whopping 21 years.
Of course visually in this movie I can see why you would think that, though.
Terminator came out in 1984. Pretenders in '88.
Still, I would have no problem with Pretenders in a Transformer movie. In fact, the idea of Decepticons being able to look human is interesting enough to make its own sequel.
Sadly it's just another element tossed in and then tossed aside, all for throwing another hot babe in the film. The ramifications of such a technology should be huge. Instead we don't even get an explanation of how they can do it. I feel sorry for those who don't know about pretenders from G1 since they would have no clue what was going on.
Delicon wrote:When I saw the movie the second time, I couldn't help but think how that whole scene really doesn't affect squat for the rest of the movie (or really tie into much before that, honestly)
Archanubis wrote:Delicon wrote:When I saw the movie the second time, I couldn't help but think how that whole scene really doesn't affect squat for the rest of the movie (or really tie into much before that, honestly)
As I mentioned before, the whole Pretender concept in this film served only two real purposes: 1) Provide some freaky eye candy for the adolescent and college males in the audience and 2) a cheap way to get Sam and co. out of the college and somewhere that Blackout copycat Grindor can grab them. A trip to the local park would have served a better purpose - with Sideways as Mikeala's rental.
Flashwave wrote:I for one, enjoyed the idea of the pretneders being back, and it solved a question I had for one of y characters whom I wanted as a human avatar without the pretender shell.
And I;m not sure the scene should have been cut. If Grindor had simply dropped out of the sky and grabbed them after the drab setup, it would have been a shock. "Alice" gave us a buildup effect, and brought Leo into the group, not just Sam and Mikaela. I doubt if they had done a scene like the park that we'd have gotten Leo, who brought them to Simmons, and so on.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Brokebot, Gauntlet101010, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Lunatyk, MSN [Bot], Roadbuster, Rodimus Prime, Sabrblade, TigrisEye, UltOrange, Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra