Optimist Prime wrote:Personally, I think killing Prime would be a big mistake. It's been done before and there is no sense in repeating something that people are already expecting.
They'll never be able to have Prime's death be as shocking as in the animated movie.
I'd rather the writers work on a more crative way of showing the cost of war than just killing more characters. More death doesn't make the war anymore significant in an imaginary world.
I have argued in the past that Jazz's death in the previous movie was basically pointless in the absence of any character development. To convey the true impact of war there needs to be an emotional conotation that the viewers can latch on to. It's kind of like when you watch the news and hear of someone's death. It may be a bummer, but it is difficult to get emotional over someone you don't know. Same goes for movies. Blockbusters like Transformers need a little more substance than big explosions and transforming robots. Although, those things are pretty cool.
Sky Glory of Iacon wrote:Wha! Oh god no! Then it wouldn't be Transformers no matter how you twist it. It would be...giant robots that turn into cars. Optimus has been established as leader he is leader. This is not a fan girl rant this is what happens when they do a change leads in series or film series suddenly. They fail horrably and very few are successful after the change.
Jaw Crusher wrote:Sky Glory of Iacon wrote:Wha! Oh god no! Then it wouldn't be Transformers no matter how you twist it. It would be...giant robots that turn into cars. Optimus has been established as leader he is leader. This is not a fan girl rant this is what happens when they do a change leads in series or film series suddenly. They fail horrably and very few are successful after the change.IMO it's highly arguable how much of a "lead" Optimus could be considered in Bay's continuity. That's like saying that no one except James T. Kirk should ever be captain of the Enterprise. The only reason Optimus is at the forefront as Autobots go is because he and Bumblebee are Hasbro's poster boys for the entire brand.
Ummm...no not that at all. You just took Prime out of context. Captain Kirk was a charector played by an actor. When the ST came back it was a super long time since anything new was made of ST When TNG came into public view.
Prime is sort of stuck in that role in the Bayformers movie for now and to change it this soon would devasate the franchise.
And IMO Marvel's original G1 comic did just fine without Optimus after they killed him off - heck,
Wha! Oh god no! Then it wouldn't be Transformers no matter how you twist it. It would be...giant robots that turn into cars. Optimus has been established as leader he is leader. This is not a fan girl rant this is what happens when they do a change leads in series or film series suddenly. They fail horrably and very few are successful after the change.
IMO it's highly arguable how much of a "lead" Optimus could be considered in Bay's continuity. That's like saying that no one except James T. Kirk should ever be captain of the Enterprise. The only reason Optimus is at the forefront as Autobots go is because he and Bumblebee are Hasbro's poster boys for the entire brand.
And IMO Marvel's original G1 comic did just fine without Optimus after they killed him off - heck,
Originally posted by -=boM=-
:lol:
No.
I had to chase a bunch of villagers out of the area because the Decepticons were attacking, then had to protect Optimus Prime's corpse. There were a shitload of us out there.
The food and catering was awesome. A lot of downtime. Just like a deployment.
I did an interview for the DVD. We will see if that is on it too. The asked me a bunch of questions about the military. The autobots are behind me on top of a sand dune. I did a GM plug. They liked that.
Micheal Bay loves the military. I got to speak with him very briefly. He gets so angry on set at the actors but doesn't dare yell or demean the military. It was a trip. He said something to me like do you want a job as a DA (Directors Assistant), I said hell yeah. He was getting pissed at his DA. His DA was like trust me you dont want this job.
I have two closeup shots if they do decide to put them in the movie. One was walking with the camera on the tracks going along with me but at a slower pace. The camera was right on the side of my face following me but at a slower rate. There were two others behind me. The other close up was while I was defending from a corner of a building on one knee. The boom camera went from the ground to over head of us all. I was up front in the scene. The camera came up to my face then began to ascend over the area. It was pretty cool.
Another scene was Optimus getting dropped off by a chinook. I had to run up to the area then stop as Optimus was getting dropped.
Another was with Josh and Tyrese when they argue with The President on the flightline. I am in the background.
As much time as I spent filming (9-10 hours a day for 4 days) I hope I am seen at least once. Hell I'll be happy to be on teh DVD.
Don't know if he stays dead, if it is in the begining or the end of the movie. They were secretive. They never refered to him as being dead. They always said his body. So there no spoiler.
Optimist Prime wrote:I have argued in the past that Jazz's death in the previous movie was basically pointless in the absence of any character development.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, figureguy, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Riot Riverman, Silver Wind, sprockitz, Yahoo [Bot], zoltaire