Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Burn wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Burn wrote:From the get go I've never been a big fan of this set, as a "female" combiner they don't look overly feminine. But hey, whatever.
Over time though it's grown on me, even talking to Va'al for his opinion and last night I just casually browsed to Premium Collectables to see how much the set would be ... and found it was on sale for $129.95AU, so I bit the bullet and ordered it.
Probably regret it once she arrives but eh, **** it.
For the record, I didn't push too hard either way.
... yeah better not say what I want to say or SillySpringer will threaten to leave the thread ... again.
Dr Va'al wrote:For the record, I didn't push too hard either way.
ZeroWolf wrote:Burn wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Burn wrote:From the get go I've never been a big fan of this set, as a "female" combiner they don't look overly feminine. But hey, whatever.
Over time though it's grown on me, even talking to Va'al for his opinion and last night I just casually browsed to Premium Collectables to see how much the set would be ... and found it was on sale for $129.95AU, so I bit the bullet and ordered it.
Probably regret it once she arrives but eh, **** it.
For the record, I didn't push too hard either way.
... yeah better not say what I want to say or SillySpringer will threaten to leave the thread ... again.
I smell an innuendo
Va'al where will you be ordering these gals from and how much? Just asking a fellow Europeans advice
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
william-james88 wrote:How's that for fictional explanation to mold reuse guys?!
Fans: Why are two the same mold?
Hasbro: Cause they are twins! Its part of the fiction, look look.
Fans: But you just made that up to use the same mold again
Hasbro: Been doing that since 1984!
But they've been using fiction (be it bios, comics, or cartoons) to explain things about the toys since 1984.Noideaforaname wrote:Plus, for me, using fiction to justify toys feels backwards. If I don't like a figure, I don't like a figure; whatever story isn't going to change that. (mind you, I'm not even the type that *has* to buy characters I like)
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:But they've been using fiction (be it bios, comics, or cartoons) to explain things about the toys since 1984.Noideaforaname wrote:Plus, for me, using fiction to justify toys feels backwards. If I don't like a figure, I don't like a figure; whatever story isn't going to change that. (mind you, I'm not even the type that *has* to buy characters I like)
Burn wrote:From the get go I've never been a big fan of this set, as a "female" combiner they don't look overly feminine. But hey, whatever.
Over time though it's grown on me, even talking to Va'al for his opinion and last night I just casually browsed to Premium Collectables to see how much the set would be ... and found it was on sale for $129.95AU, so I bit the bullet and ordered it.
Probably regret it once she arrives but eh, **** it.
D-Maximus_Primal wrote:I eagerly await your inevitable opinion!
Burn wrote:D-Maximus_Primal wrote:I eagerly await your inevitable opinion!
You're ugly and you smell funny.
william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:But they've been using fiction (be it bios, comics, or cartoons) to explain things about the toys since 1984.
I think he just meant that as mature fans, some of us have outgrown that and I am in that boat.
Bronzewolf wrote:Primus, who Transformed it like that and thought "Oh, those arms look totally normal, and not mistransformed at all!"
That's nice to hear, but a lot of the appeal in these toys that helps to make them successful is that they actually represent characters with personalities and backstory that's conveyed by their on-package bios and/or supporting media. Said bios help to set the Transformers apart from competitor products. If all it takes for fans to buy these is if the toys look cool, regardless of the character itself, that's sounds fine on paper, but kind of makes it seem like the toy bios are superfluous rather than the integral aspects that they've been for most of the brand's history. I recall a time from 2001-2004 when the first RiD toyline, the Armada toyline, the first Universe toyline, the Energon toyline, and the Alternators toyline were all mostly devoid of on-package toy bios, with bios for most of the toys in these lines being confined to Hasbro's online website, which was very unpleasant given how sporadic Hasbro's website would update its bios section with new bios for more characters and even take down some for others. If not for the cartoons of the time (which were VERY hard for me to catch on TV back then), many of these toys would have been characterless nobodies, and some of them still are even to this day.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:But they've been using fiction (be it bios, comics, or cartoons) to explain things about the toys since 1984.Noideaforaname wrote:Plus, for me, using fiction to justify toys feels backwards. If I don't like a figure, I don't like a figure; whatever story isn't going to change that. (mind you, I'm not even the type that *has* to buy characters I like)
I think he just meant that as mature fans, some of us have outgrown that and I am in that boat. I can look past the marketing and just see the toy for the mwrrit I personally give it. Fiction explaining a toys existence won't sway me to buy it more. And in reverse I don't need the fiction to back up a new character or feature for me to buy it. For instance the idea of beast bot hybrids that turn into vehicles in RID is all I need to buy the toys.
I knew I wanted a thunderhoof toy the moment I saw that character model, didn't matter what he did in the show.
And a headmaster galvatron doesn't matter as long as it looks good and is a well done toy. But that's just me.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Prowl4 wrote:Be calm lads no need to pre order. This thing will soon be on clearance.
Sabrblade wrote:That's nice to hear, but a lot of the appeal in these toys that helps to make them successful is that they actually represent characters with personalities and backstory that's conveyed by their on-package bios and/or supporting media. Said bios help to set the Transformers apart from competitor products. If all it takes for fans to buy these is if the toys look cool, regardless of the character itself, that's sounds fine on paper, but kind of makes it seem like the toy bios are superfluous rather than the integral aspects that they've been for most of the brand's history. I recall a time from 2001-2004 when the first RiD toyline, the Armada toyline, the first Universe toyline, the Energon toyline, and the Alternators toyline were all mostly devoid of on-package toy bios, with bios for most of the toys in these lines being confined to Hasbro's online website, which was very unpleasant given how sporadic Hasbro's website would update its bios section with new bios for more characters and even take down some for others. If not for the cartoons of the time (which were VERY hard for me to catch on TV back then), many of these toys would have been characterless nobodies, and some of them still are even to this day.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:But they've been using fiction (be it bios, comics, or cartoons) to explain things about the toys since 1984.Noideaforaname wrote:Plus, for me, using fiction to justify toys feels backwards. If I don't like a figure, I don't like a figure; whatever story isn't going to change that. (mind you, I'm not even the type that *has* to buy characters I like)
I think he just meant that as mature fans, some of us have outgrown that and I am in that boat. I can look past the marketing and just see the toy for the mwrrit I personally give it. Fiction explaining a toys existence won't sway me to buy it more. And in reverse I don't need the fiction to back up a new character or feature for me to buy it. For instance the idea of beast bot hybrids that turn into vehicles in RID is all I need to buy the toys.
I knew I wanted a thunderhoof toy the moment I saw that character model, didn't matter what he did in the show.
And a headmaster galvatron doesn't matter as long as it looks good and is a well done toy. But that's just me.
william-james88 wrote:Also be weary of hope in this hobby. Hope is just undiscovered disappointment.
Agamemnon, barebacked rider of flying robo-dragon, and not often constipated either...My nephew wrote:Bacon is meat candy.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Jelze Bunnycat, Mewtwo Ex, MSN [Bot], o.supreme, RodimusPrimeUkraine1