Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:I would be more excited if they were going to use new molds with actual fembot bodies instead of repainted male bodies with fembot heads. Robobutch is not going to be very feminine in my opinion no matter what shade of pink or pastel easter egg colors they paint her.
I'm sure some third party will make a bunch of robo-boob add-ons so you're less confused about it all. Maybe wait untill those get knocked off so they can be cheap as well.
Thats a great idea !
I would love for all of them to be shaped like the girl in your signature that you glorify as being perfect !
I do?
Well if you dont, I challenge you to change your signature to Bridget Powers for a week.
My perception of one person (in my sig) does not equate me superimposing that bodytype on every female, nor does it prohibit me from speaking out against those who do demand it. A bet does not change that.
Well, your perception of one particular person with a supermodel body on a constant basis doesnt exactly show tons of support the less fortunate women you claim to be defending. Youre pretty much glorifying the same thing I am but in a digital form rather than plastic toys.
RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:I would be more excited if they were going to use new molds with actual fembot bodies instead of repainted male bodies with fembot heads. Robobutch is not going to be very feminine in my opinion no matter what shade of pink or pastel easter egg colors they paint her.
I'm sure some third party will make a bunch of robo-boob add-ons so you're less confused about it all. Maybe wait untill those get knocked off so they can be cheap as well.
Thats a great idea !
I would love for all of them to be shaped like the girl in your signature that you glorify as being perfect !
I do?
Well if you dont, I challenge you to change your signature to Bridget Powers for a week.
My perception of one person (in my sig) does not equate me superimposing that bodytype on every female, nor does it prohibit me from speaking out against those who do demand it. A bet does not change that.
Well, your perception of one particular person with a supermodel body on a constant basis doesnt exactly show tons of support the less fortunate women you claim to be defending. Youre pretty much glorifying the same thing I am but in a digital form rather than plastic toys.
Pure assumption based on, again, one example. Never once do I state that every one should look like that. You have stated a few times over that 'females should look like females'. How does that make us the same?
LE0KING wrote:ctrlFrequency wrote:LE0KING wrote:
Seeing as how this first appears in a combiner hunters comic, I'd guess that when Victorion combines she hulks out and loses control. Or what if Victorion just hates herself. Just think about it, lock six women in a room and there will be fights and drama. Lock six women in one body...
That statement right there is what's wrong with this world. Knee jerk sexism.
Woah, sorry I set you off, ha ha. The joke was intended to be good humor, (my sister even laughed) I make the same types of jokes about everything, it wasn't meant to be cutting.
Plus I actually agree with you on most points, from the over sexualization of arcee to nautica being one of the best new characters yet. Please don't jump on the offensive so quickly, not everyone is trying to demean you. Honestly though, I am sorry.
Tsutsukakushi wrote:Think this is a great idea. It's a great way to give fans Six Fembots toys all at once.
Noticed some of the CW toys have feminine sculpts. Skinny thighs, slender abs stomach sections. bulky upper chest. skinny arms. Slender robot modes.
If done right, Think this could turn out perfect.
Burn wrote:Let it be known, I murdered Amelie.
Accidentally.
Rated X wrote:LE0KING wrote:ctrlFrequency wrote:LE0KING wrote:
Seeing as how this first appears in a combiner hunters comic, I'd guess that when Victorion combines she hulks out and loses control. Or what if Victorion just hates herself. Just think about it, lock six women in a room and there will be fights and drama. Lock six women in one body...
That statement right there is what's wrong with this world. Knee jerk sexism.
Woah, sorry I set you off, ha ha. The joke was intended to be good humor, (my sister even laughed) I make the same types of jokes about everything, it wasn't meant to be cutting.
Plus I actually agree with you on most points, from the over sexualization of arcee to nautica being one of the best new characters yet. Please don't jump on the offensive so quickly, not everyone is trying to demean you. Honestly though, I am sorry.
Well I thought it was funny.![]()
And it's kinda true. Have you ever watched WWE Total Divas ?
Va'al wrote:I'd like to hope, much like Diem and ctrlFrequency, that the new characters will be given non-conforming behaviour (as well as design, where possible), and as rich a backstory as Windblade's/the Camiens' is proving to be.
Burn wrote:Let it be known, I murdered Amelie.
Accidentally.
Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:I would be more excited if they were going to use new molds with actual fembot bodies instead of repainted male bodies with fembot heads. Robobutch is not going to be very feminine in my opinion no matter what shade of pink or pastel easter egg colors they paint her.
I'm sure some third party will make a bunch of robo-boob add-ons so you're less confused about it all. Maybe wait untill those get knocked off so they can be cheap as well.
Thats a great idea !
I would love for all of them to be shaped like the girl in your signature that you glorify as being perfect !
I do?
Well if you dont, I challenge you to change your signature to Bridget Powers for a week.
My perception of one person (in my sig) does not equate me superimposing that bodytype on every female, nor does it prohibit me from speaking out against those who do demand it. A bet does not change that.
Well, your perception of one particular person with a supermodel body on a constant basis doesnt exactly show tons of support the less fortunate women you claim to be defending. Youre pretty much glorifying the same thing I am but in a digital form rather than plastic toys.
Pure assumption based on, again, one example. Never once do I state that every one should look like that. You have stated a few times over that 'females should look like females'. How does that make us the same?
You ever heard the old expression "one picture speaks a thousand words" ?
You've been glorifying the same girl for years on you signature. It's all about perception. For all I know you could be attracted to a woman who is a 300 pound amputee missing ten teeth and blind in one eye. But she doesn't get a spot on your signature, does she ? You've made it very clear what type of woman deserves a spot on your signature. And if it makes you feel better, I'm totally down with that. I love hot adult film stars just as much as you.
Va'al wrote:Second and last warning - further posts not directly related to the topic of Victorion will be removed, and the poster will receive a board warning.
LE0KING wrote:ctrlFrequency wrote:LE0KING wrote:
Seeing as how this first appears in a combiner hunters comic, I'd guess that when Victorion combines she hulks out and loses control. Or what if Victorion just hates herself. Just think about it, lock six women in a room and there will be fights and drama. Lock six women in one body...
That statement right there is what's wrong with this world. Knee jerk sexism.
Woah, sorry I set you off, ha ha. The joke was intended to be good humor, (my sister even laughed) I make the same types of jokes about everything, it wasn't meant to be cutting.
Plus I actually agree with you on most points, from the over sexualization of arcee to nautica being one of the best new characters yet. Please don't jump on the offensive so quickly, not everyone is trying to demean you. Honestly though, I am sorry.
Burn wrote:P.S.
**** you CF.
And not only that, but it was an announcement that gave us no less than FIVE newsworthy pieces of information!Va'al wrote:But for my additional comment on the story - it was in USA Today!
PEOPLE - A Transformers announcement was made in mainstream media, and not about the live-action series! We're relevant again!![]()
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:And not only that, but it was an announcement that gave us no less than FIVE newsworthy pieces of information!Va'al wrote:But for my additional comment on the story - it was in USA Today!
PEOPLE - A Transformers announcement was made in mainstream media, and not about the live-action series! We're relevant again!![]()
![]()
1. A clip of Windblade's appearance in the RID cartoon.
2. Windblade's voice actress being Kristy Wu.
3. The fan-built combiner's name and gender
4. A clip of Blurr and Salvage's debut in Rescue Bots.
5. And a female Rescue Bot coming in season 4!
And, like you said, none of it is movie news! That is unheard of, and is AWESOME!
ctrlFrequency wrote:Back on topic so Va'al doesn't have to warn us again. If Roberts and Scott are responsible for their personalities, we might see this all come to a great conclusion. Both of them can write a good strong character That focuses less on gender more on personality. I don't care for Windblade's personality , but that is because she lacks one, and I don't fault the writing, I think she lacks clear direction. At least Nautica has a personality, though Chromia... she coulduse some depth.
RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:RhA wrote:Rated X wrote:I would be more excited if they were going to use new molds with actual fembot bodies instead of repainted male bodies with fembot heads. Robobutch is not going to be very feminine in my opinion no matter what shade of pink or pastel easter egg colors they paint her.
I'm sure some third party will make a bunch of robo-boob add-ons so you're less confused about it all. Maybe wait untill those get knocked off so they can be cheap as well.
Thats a great idea !
I would love for all of them to be shaped like the girl in your signature that you glorify as being perfect !
I do?
Well if you dont, I challenge you to change your signature to Bridget Powers for a week.
My perception of one person (in my sig) does not equate me superimposing that bodytype on every female, nor does it prohibit me from speaking out against those who do demand it. A bet does not change that.
Well, your perception of one particular person with a supermodel body on a constant basis doesnt exactly show tons of support the less fortunate women you claim to be defending. Youre pretty much glorifying the same thing I am but in a digital form rather than plastic toys.
Pure assumption based on, again, one example. Never once do I state that every one should look like that. You have stated a few times over that 'females should look like females'. How does that make us the same?
You ever heard the old expression "one picture speaks a thousand words" ?
You've been glorifying the same girl for years on you signature. It's all about perception. For all I know you could be attracted to a woman who is a 300 pound amputee missing ten teeth and blind in one eye. But she doesn't get a spot on your signature, does she ? You've made it very clear what type of woman deserves a spot on your signature. And if it makes you feel better, I'm totally down with that. I love hot adult film stars just as much as you.
You seem to write our won story to my picture.
What my sexual preference is in terms of body type is a personal choice. It doesn't matter what I think about one single person. It matters if I superimpose that woman's body as a standard for all women. If I did, I would complain about things not being exactly the way I want them, would I? That's the beauty of this combiner, Strongarm, Strika and whatever non-stereotypical female character is in the TF series. They break the mold (figuratively).
Why must they be shaped like an adult film star? I'd like it if they weren't, even if I use the same avatar over and over, I stand by my point.
Tsutsukakushi wrote:Would like the Six CW Fem Bots toys to be the most relevant ones. Currently appearing in the IDW TF comics. Windblade, Chromia, Nautica, Arcee, ? , ? .
Wondering which Fem Bot will be chosen as the leader and torso of the Combiner. Speculating it will be Windblade. Using a repurposed CW Silverbolt toy.
CW Chromia will probably use the Legends grove toy.
CW arcee might use a CW Stunticon toy.
Going to be weird seeing newer update toys for Arcee, Windblade and Chromia. As they got new toys last year.
Hoping the HasTak team will be able to turn one of the CW toys into a water vehicle for Nautica. Would be wrong if they gave Nautica a new land or air vehicle.
Rated X wrote:The more I think about the name "Victorion" the more it starts to get annoying. I keep thinking of old houses from the early 1800s. Yeah I know theres a one letter difference from "Victorian", but the history buff in me cant seem to associate any similar sounding word to futuristic robot warriors.
Rated X wrote:The more I think about the name "Victorion" the more it starts to get annoying. I keep thinking of old houses from the early 1800s. Yeah I know theres a one letter difference from "Victorian", but the history buff in me cant seem to associate any similar sounding word to futuristic robot warriors.
Editor wrote:Rated X wrote:The more I think about the name "Victorion" the more it starts to get annoying. I keep thinking of old houses from the early 1800s. Yeah I know theres a one letter difference from "Victorian", but the history buff in me cant seem to associate any similar sounding word to futuristic robot warriors.
How about Victory?
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: AdsBot [Google], Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Ikijigoku, MSN [Bot], Nemesis Destron, Silver Wind, Yahoo [Bot]