Rated X wrote:I’m really trying to see how you see Hasbro Springer as being in scale with the other popular 1986 movie figures. But I’m just not seeing it…
... ... ...
Looks like Defender is perfectly in scale to me. Granted Hasbro Springer is a nice stand alone figure. I don’t regret buying him. The head is a lot better than Defender's head. But he scales with the rest of the classics line and 3rd party figures like crap. Same thing with Blitzwing.
Well, when it comes to the toyline, with rare exception we have never been able to have consistent scale, and it certainly has little bearing on how the characters appeared in the show. So when I talk about characters scaling well together, it is more a case of, "They are sizes that work well together, and look good grouped on the shelf." It does not mean, "They are exactly how they were in the show, and if they aren't, then oh my god, rage!"
And frankly, I think Hasbro's Springer looks damn good with his fellows. Stands a good height with Rodimus (in Protector armor) and Magnus. Towers over the Arcee I use a bit, but that actually works for a toy display to me. She can stand in front of her boys without looking
too short in comparison, but she doesn't block them from being viewed.
But I'm not going to debate that with you. 'Cause if you don't like how Springer looks on your shelf with the other toys you have, and would rather use Defender, that's your business and you're entitled to that opinion.
But I would argue you basing that opinion on rigid adherence to how scale was presented in the cartoon, especially since it was a cartoon with at times laughable quality control. Just as there was little regard to scale in the toyline, there was at the best of times just vague adherence to it in the cartoon. And at the worst of times... Well...
My argument:






