The Energon Pub

Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:43 pm

http://trekweb.com/articles/2008/10/15/First-Official-Photos-of-Star-Trek-Movie-Enterprise-Crew-Kirk-Spock-and-Nero.shtml

Thoughts?

Personally, I still feel this could go either way. Still, I don't mind not seeing Kirk in the gold tunic yet, and it's nice to see the skirts back :grin:

. And Quinto just looks wicked.

News Credits: 49 · Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:45 pm

So, in the Spock picture.

Who actually sees Spock doing that, or Sylar going ape-@#$% during a Trek Convention?

News Credits: 38 · Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:11 pm

For those too lazy to click a link:

News Credits: 14 · Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:01 pm

Definitely not feeling Quinto (Hero's Sylar) as Spock. He's just not giving off that, logical, and unshakable Nimoy vibe.

But we'll have to wait and see how well he does it.

Kirk look like he just stepped of the Academy School Bus.

Uhura looks hot. I'd let her Open Hailing frequencies for me any time.

Not too bad, though the final judgment will come the day of the premiere.

Anybody else feel the uncontrollable urge to sing Weird Al's Star Trek Rhapsody all of a sudden.

News Credits: 26 · Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:29 pm

Here is a full veiw of one in widescreen

Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:43 pm

GOD THEY KILLED NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I hate it except the command deck is sweet

Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:14 pm

For the record, I HATE remakes. They are a waste of time and rarely actually portray the original in a better lite.

I am not looking forward to this one.

However, whoever is playing "Bones" has got it to a T.

Every pic of him is perfect for a young Bones.

:DEVIL:

News Credits: 26 · Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:12 pm

Then you have missed a great show in the new Battlestar Galactica

Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:30 pm

To be honest, I've never really been into star trek. (ducks) however, this movie looks like a great starting point.

News Credits: 1 · Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:05 pm

Looking at these pictures makes me more and more excited for the new movie. Man it is really giving me that itch to watch the movies again. The only thing I want to see is the bridge as a whole and not what is just in that shot.

News Credits: 97 · Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:31 pm

Wheeljack35 wrote:Then you have missed a great show in the new Battlestar Galactica

Q.F.T.
(quoted for truth or quite ****ing true, take your pick)

BSG has been phenominal. They kept the ideas and values of the original story, and added a lot of new ideas, a complex captivating plot, and edge-of-your-seat storytelling. Anyone who hasn't watched BSG is doing themselves a grave mis-service.

On the subject of the pictures at hand, I like how the clothing styles are so reminiscent of the original series. The Command Deck looks sweet. I'm hoping for the best and reserving judgment til I see it onscreen.

Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:59 am

First pic I saw of the new Star Trek was the front of Entertainment
Weekly when I was at my hairdresser's. On that cover, the guy playing Spock (pardon me don't got the which actor is playing whom thing down yet). In that picture the two of us agreed he looked like Spock whereas the one as Kirk no, no, and no, and no.

I think it could be good but 4 me, yest waiting to see trailer attitude. My biggest beef in terms of exterior details though is that bridge--Could've handed it over to NCC-1701-E. It's too modern looking.

News Credits: 2 · Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:34 am

DREWCIFER wrote:However, whoever is playing "Bones" has got it to a T.

Karl Urban. He was Eomer in Lord of the Rings, and John "Reaper" Grimm in Doom. He's actually not a bad choice.

News Credits: 26 · Sun Oct 19, 2008 12:40 pm

Friend of Da Panda Symbol wrote:My biggest beef in terms of exterior details though is that bridge--Could've handed it over to NCC-1701-E. It's too modern looking.

I had this same feeling when Enerprise was on

The NX-01 was supposed to a 100 year behind the NCC-1701 Enterprise but it looked like it was more advanced

News Credits: 38 · Sun Oct 19, 2008 1:06 pm

Well honestly, how could they make it look even crappier than the bridge from the 60's? If they would have had the budget of the newer shows, the materials, the creation methods and the outlook on how technology would actually advance, it would have looked completely different. This is why the bridge doesn't matter to me. If this were the case, they should put the enterprise up on wires with Styrofoam planets in the background.

News Credits: 26 · Sun Oct 19, 2008 7:14 pm

If they thought about it they could of done someting to make it look old but futuristic

News Credits: 38 · Sun Oct 19, 2008 7:59 pm

If that isn't an oxymoron I don't know what is.

News Credits: 26 · Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:37 pm

Iron-Man wrote:If that isn't an oxymoron I don't know what is.

It cannot be an oxymoron both words are separated by the word "but"

News Credits: 1 · Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:44 pm

Spock and Kirk's hair annoy me.

Majorly.

It looks really fake.

News Credits: 2 · Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:07 pm

Original Sin wrote:Spock and Kirk's hair annoy me.

Majorly.

It looks really fake.

Because we all know William Shatner never had fake hair.

News Credits: 26 · Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:45 pm

**Looks around**

I wonder where sto-vo-kor is he is the biggest Trek fan on this board

Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:03 pm

More new pics at http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=23522

Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:59 pm

It looks interesting but I'm still not 100% sold on another Star Trek prequel movie/series again. You need to go forward not backwards.

Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:36 pm

Well folks, those of you who haven't liked what you've seen so far, you probably won't like what's coming next...

...the first confirmed, genuine, 100% real image of the new film version of the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701, as revealed at http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2008/11/star-trek-first.html

Eh...I would have preferred the fan design that Gabe Koerner did, frankly. I guess I'd have to see this thing on screen before I cast a solid judgement on it, but I can safely say I think the production designers got a wee bit too carried away with themselves.