Oilspill wrote:Read into it what you like,
I'm not reading anything into it other then what the definitions of the words used support.
You on the other hand are choosing to subscribe to only 1 definition of the words used.
Oilspill wrote: but it's "pretty clear" to me because that's how the english language works.
Actually its not how the English language works.Which is why its not pretty clear at all.The English language was set up in a way that cretin words had no clear cut definition and that each sentence would have to determined on the context of the conversation.
Oilspill wrote: If Megatron says he "built them" then it implies he built them in their entirety.
Have you looked up the definition of the word "Built"?????Or "Building"?????
It by no means "Solely implies" that the one "BUILDING" or the one who "BUILT" has done so in its entirety.
I can "BUILD" a plastic model but I did not "Build" it in its "ENTIRETY".
You, or a mechanic, can "BUILD" a car engine useing parts bought or salvaged but neither would be "BUILDING" in in its "ENTIRETY".
Oilspill wrote: If he was just building a part of them, like their bodies, then he would have specified that he built their bodies.
For that matter if he had "BUILT" them from scratch then he would have
"specified" that he
"CREATED" them.
Megatron was a braggart.......he had no problem pointing out his "CREATIONS".
Seems odd that he wouldnt have bragged about
"CREATING" the Constructicons.
Oilspill wrote:Anything else is just a retcon... which is fine, if that's how you want to interpret it, since it makes the whole thing make more sense.
How is it a "RETCON" when none of the dialog is changed?????Its not a "RETCON" because of the fact that nothing was ever
"specified" about how and why they first appeared.
HMW left it ambiguous in the air.The Dialog does not point to just one answer because the words used have multiple definitions.
A Retcon would be saying that the Dinibots were created by someone other then Wheeljack and Ratchet because that would be changing a "KNOWN" fact.
But there's not "KNOWN" fact about how the Constructicons were "Created".
The word "BUILT" could have been used as to say new bodies were "Built" or it could have been used as a
"METAPHOR".
Their are a few examples of TF's useing
"METAPHORS" in relation to how they came into being.
The long and short of the issue is that there's no "CLEAR" cut answer.
It may very well be that the writter intended the use of the words
"BUILT" to be taken as "Built entirely from scratch".But we are not talking about the writers intention nor can we.
And in the long run its not really relevant to the issue at hand since many changes are normally made from the time a episode is written till the time its completed.
What is relevant is the finished product, and in the episode "Heavy Metal War" there is no conclusive dialog that specified Megatron ""Built entirely from scratch".
So if you want to subscribe to only one definition of the word "BUILT" that is your choice but it's only an indication of you wanting to find fault with the series.