The Energon Pub

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:49 am

Man, now I realize that I never saw the humans getting rid of Bonecrusher. Is there hope of reviving him?

Sweet! That's the topic's 100-th post!

by **Deadpool.** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:50 am

Is there anything that is truely confirmed?

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:51 am

Nope.

News Credits: 11 · by **Robinson** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:19 am

Den-O wrote:
An_de wrote:
The Fallen. wrote:Oh by the way, Starscream apparently really was the one who launched missiles at Megatron in the city battle. Before that, Starscream was in jet mode and was chasing after 1 human jet, with the other jets behind him. The jet that launched the missiles at Megatron was the second one in line, which was Starscream.

I knew that Starscream betrayed him!

I was studying the movie again... and it turns out it was true.

No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No,No.

There were atleast 12 raptors in the sky, 3 squadrons of 4. There is not way to know that ss was the one that shot megs bacause they all look alike. You can't claim fanboy theory sa fact.

Stop looking more into the movie than what is really there.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:23 am

But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:27 am

An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

by **Deadpool.** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:29 am

Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

Because past SSs have been known for such treacheries.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:31 am

Den-O wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

Because past SSs have been known for such treacheries.

But not this Starscream.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:37 am

Leonardo wrote:
Den-O wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

Because past SSs have been known for such treacheries.

But not this Starscream.

On the contrary - SS is always pretending to be loyal to Megatron but he isn't. Maybe in the sequel we'll know the truth.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:37 am

An_de wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
Den-O wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

Because past SSs have been known for such treacheries.

But not this Starscream.

On the contrary - SS is always pretending to be loyal to Megatron.

When? He only said about two lines in the film. There was nothing to show he was betraying Megatron.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:42 am

Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
Den-O wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

Because past SSs have been known for such treacheries.

But not this Starscream.

On the contrary - SS is always pretending to be loyal to Megatron.

When? He only said about two lines in the film. There was nothing to show he was betraying Megatron.

I guess you're right. But the fact that he came to Earth to find Megatron, well I don't know what this means. What I do know is that it is logical if he betrays him because all the StarScreams do it all the time.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:45 am

An_de wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
Den-O wrote:
Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:But it's logical if StarScream attacked him.

Why?

Because past SSs have been known for such treacheries.

But not this Starscream.

On the contrary - SS is always pretending to be loyal to Megatron.

When? He only said about two lines in the film. There was nothing to show he was betraying Megatron.

I guess you're right. But the fact that he came to Earth to find Megatron, well I don't know what this means. What I do know is that it is logical if he betrays him because all the StarScreams do it all the time.

Ah, but the actions of a previous namesake do not dictate the actions of a new version. Movie Starscream has little, if anything, to do with any other Starscreams, save for the fact he transforms into a plane.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:49 am

I'd like if Bay sticks with the original story.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:50 am

I'd like if Bay sticks with the original story.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:52 am

An_de wrote:I'd like if Bay sticks with the original story.

A lot of people feel the same!

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:54 am

Leonardo wrote:
An_de wrote:I'd like if Bay sticks with the original story.

A lot of people feel the same!

Agree

News Credits: 11 · by **Robinson** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:26 am

An_de wrote:I'd like if Bay sticks with the original story.

The new timeline for this universe is done, its on film so it is the "original story". The time has come to stopp looking back and wishing for what will never be, but to look forward and hope for what is to come.

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:29 am

Robinson wrote:The time has come to stopp looking back and wishing for what will never be, but to look forward and hope for what is to come.

Are you talking about Transformers or life?

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:42 am

Leonardo wrote:
Robinson wrote:The time has come to stopp looking back and wishing for what will never be, but to look forward and hope for what is to come.

Are you talking about Transformers or life?

I ask the same question.

News Credits: 11 · by **Robinson** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:45 am

Leonardo wrote:
Robinson wrote:The time has come to stopp looking back and wishing for what will never be, but to look forward and hope for what is to come.

Are you talking about Transformers or life?

For some, Transformers is their life. Take what you will from that.

I really meant in terms of the movie, stop hoping for it to be just like what we had and embrace the change and hopefully it can lead to bigger and better. But it works for lif too.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:08 am

I realized something... What is the point if the movie sticks to the G1 story... I mean isn't it going to be more interesting if the story is new, not G1-based?

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:16 am

Exactly what Robinson was saying!

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:20 am

Leonardo wrote:Exactly what Robinson was saying!

Oh. He was right then

.

News Credits: 2 · by **An_de** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:57 am

As much as I remember from the movie, Bonecrusher only had his head off. I mean can't they repair him?

by **whats crackin lil bitches** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:34 pm

unicron is too difficult/fantastical for Bay to tackle in an action/comedy that needs to be grounded in quasi-scientific realism. an evil planet-sized robotic-killer that could grant dead robots life and swallow whole planets??? (after all the whole point of the movie was to show the allspark was the only thing that could give them life and now that was destroyed there was no point to the autobots to go home). like others said, bonecrusher is dead and will remain dead.

having said that, not sure how they are going to revive megatron or rebuild him into galvatron in the sequel.