Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
RevTibe wrote:Prowl4 wrote:They are all the same with the same traits I listed if you read what I said. Injured yes but has one even died even a throwaway fembot? No.
I'm not sure if this is genuine ignorance or willful ignorance. Either way, discussing your myopic view of characterization clearly won't have any benefit.
Many people have tried to explain to you that if female TFs are a smaller fraction of the cast than the male TFs, and haven't been around as long as the male TFs, some of them even less than a year, then of course there aren't going to be major female TF deaths yet. (Have there even been a dozen significant character deaths since female TFs were properly introduced in Dark Cybertron?) If you want to see female TFs die, you should really be pushing for a 50/50 gender split in the comics - much more likely you'll get what you want then.Prowl4 wrote:Mairghread Scott is a dreadful writer,
My ability to take you seriously in regards to anything regarding Scott was obliterated after your "She's only got the job because she's a woman!!!!!" spiel.I said your distaste for women in the franchise was your "most common theme", not your only theme. After all, who could forget your quote about James Roberts's "disturbing homosexual material"?Prowl4 wrote:If you think I don't criticize male writers, characters and toys I'm afraid you're deluded.
Bringing it back to the beginning, Arcee's been skillfully, perhaps even impressively, used in Sins of the Wreckers. SotW really needed to have an issue's downtime for Impactor and the once-comatose Springer - it would've felt a bit rushed/jarring if they showed up, ready and active on the first page. Arcee served to move issue #1's plot so the Wreckers could get their dramatic end-of-issue reveal, and gracefully switched to being a secondary/supporting character following the Wreckers' appearance.
Here, this page of Windblade displays the title character acting empathetically, yet somewhat coercively, towards Waspinator. I'd say this is one of the key aspects of the character - her morality leads her towards compassion/just treatment, yet she is willing to compromise that for a perceived greater good (after all, Waspinator is clearly afraid and unwilling to perform the favor she's persistently requesting).Prowl4 wrote:They are though prove they aren't.
Prowl4 wrote:Mairghread Scott is dreadful and largely in place because if she was removed would cry sexism. She seems the type.
Prowl4 wrote:Roberts use of homosexuality between transformers is disturbing, prove it otherwise.
RevTibe wrote:Here, this page of Windblade displays the title character acting empathetically, yet somewhat coercively, toward Waspinator. I'd say this is one of the key aspects of the character - her morality leads her towards compassion/just treatment, yet she is willing to compromise that for a perceived greater good (after all, Waspinator is clearly afraid and unwilling to perform the favor she's persistently requesting).Prowl4 wrote:They are though prove they aren't.
These are defining qualities of Windblade, and are not present in this form in other female Transformers.Prowl4 wrote:Mairghread Scott is dreadful and largely in place because if she was removed would cry sexism. She seems the type.
To quote a fellow from this thread; prove it.Prowl4 wrote:Roberts use of homosexuality between transformers is disturbing, prove it otherwise.
This statement is broken on many levels. "Disturbing" is subjective, and your use of it is indicative of certain... qualities of your character, not the qualities of the comic. If you think that the "homosexual material" is provably disturbing, then perhaps you yourself should provide that proof.
Prowl4 wrote:RevTibe wrote:Prowl4 wrote:They are all the same with the same traits I listed if you read what I said. Injured yes but has one even died even a throwaway fembot? No.
I'm not sure if this is genuine ignorance or willful ignorance. Either way, discussing your myopic view of characterization clearly won't have any benefit.
Many people have tried to explain to you that if female TFs are a smaller fraction of the cast than the male TFs, and haven't been around as long as the male TFs, some of them even less than a year, then of course there aren't going to be major female TF deaths yet. (Have there even been a dozen significant character deaths since female TFs were properly introduced in Dark Cybertron?) If you want to see female TFs die, you should really be pushing for a 50/50 gender split in the comics - much more likely you'll get what you want then.Prowl4 wrote:Mairghread Scott is a dreadful writer,
My ability to take you seriously in regards to anything regarding Scott was obliterated after your "She's only got the job because she's a woman!!!!!" spiel.I said your distaste for women in the franchise was your "most common theme", not your only theme. After all, who could forget your quote about James Roberts's "disturbing homosexual material"?Prowl4 wrote:If you think I don't criticize male writers, characters and toys I'm afraid you're deluded.
Bringing it back to the beginning, Arcee's been skillfully, perhaps even impressively, used in Sins of the Wreckers. SotW really needed to have an issue's downtime for Impactor and the once-comatose Springer - it would've felt a bit rushed/jarring if they showed up, ready and active on the first page. Arcee served to move issue #1's plot so the Wreckers could get their dramatic end-of-issue reveal, and gracefully switched to being a secondary/supporting character following the Wreckers' appearance.
They are though prove they aren't.
Mairghread Scott is dreadful and largely in place because if she was removed would cry sexism. She seems the type.
Roberts use of homosexuality between transformers is disturbing, prove it otherwise.
What a silly thing to say that a 50/50 split for female deaths. Cabbage opinion that.
Yes, you're memorable, but trust me, that's nothing to be proud of here. While I would be genuinely happy to see you grow past a lot of what you've presented, that isn't my primary goal.Prowl4 wrote:Your third point is entirely from a personal point of view I think it's funny how you follow, read and respond to everything I say which is indicative of yourself because I'm going to have the same opinions and beliefs no matter what you say. Am I bothered with your thoughts and opinions, no.
Again, you present your own personal failing as universal fact. You tell me to "disprove" that they are disturbing without putting in effort to prove it.Prowl4 wrote:Homosexual transformers are disturbing, what of it?
RevTibe wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Your third point is entirely from a personal point of view I think it's funny how you follow, read and respond to everything I say which is indicative of yourself because I'm going to have the same opinions and beliefs no matter what you say. Am I bothered with your thoughts and opinions, no.[/quite]Yes, you're memorable, but trust me, that's nothing to be proud of here. While I would be genuinely happy to see you grow past a lot of what you've presented, that isn't my primary goal.
This thread is a group discussion of Sins of the Wreckers, you leveled what I consider to be incredibly flawed criticism at an aspect of SotW, and the most effective way to support my counterargument is to simply present your own critique in the context of what you've said in the past. Disassembling your arguments in such a manner is a useful thing in a group discussion.Again, you present your own personal failing as universal fact. You tell me to "disprove" that they are disturbing without putting in effort to prove it.Prowl4 wrote:Homosexual transformers are disturbing, what of it?
Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
ZeroWolf wrote:I I was wondering what you meant about arcee in the movieverse but them I remembered that they were in RotF for a combined screentime of...what? 10 minutes. Let's face it, they weren't characters, they were just cannon fodder to make it seem like the good guys actually had some casualties.
In fact comparing them to IDW is a bit of a fallacy as there is actually characters in IDW .
Also funny you mention g1 as no fembot is actually hurt in that either.
I'm going to assume it's only homosexual tfs you have a problem with, and not humans.
By the by, technically there isn't any homosexual transformers as until Dark Cybertron introduced the camiens, only Arcee had a gender, everyone else had no gender hence arcee being the only fembot.
Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
Freedom of speech to be disturbed by what I wish.
This is the first time I've seen the "you responded to me, therefore I win!" argument used by an adult. Bravo. Did I not already establish that my primary goal isn't to help you grow as a person? World doesn't revolve around you, mate.Prowl4 wrote:Lovely to be remembered and to have a fan it seems thanks.
...
We can go over this again and again but the fact remains my opinion and views won't change, you can continue to reply to me which is honestly pointless and a waste of what I'd imagine is your precious time.
It's funny - you called a page of evidence "insufficient", yet you offer nothing to support your own points. (I do enjoy G1 and, to an extent, the Bay flicks. Messy, but some fun moments and concepts.)Prowl4 wrote:No flaw to it it's pure fact. Obviously you like the characters and the agenda of idw. You must hate g1 and the bayverse lol.
Seriously, "homosexual agenda"? Acknowledging that gay romance exists is an agenda? The only agenda here is your belief that this should be censored.Prowl4 wrote:Homosexual agenda transformers are disturbing and have no place in these comics. Don't need a reason to not like something. If I don't like it I don't like it.
Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
Freedom of speech to be disturbed by what I wish.
Poor precious crumpet.
This is currently Seibertron.com's main page banner:
RevTibe wrote:This is the first time I've seen the "you responded to me, therefore I win!" argument used by an adult. Bravo. Did I not already establish that my primary goal isn't to help you grow as a person? World doesn't revolve around you, mate.Prowl4 wrote:Lovely to be remembered and to have a fan it seems thanks.
...
We can go over this again and again but the fact remains my opinion and views won't change, you can continue to reply to me which is honestly pointless and a waste of what I'd imagine is your precious time.
It's funny - you called a page of evidence "insufficient", yet you offer nothing to support your own points. (I do enjoy G1 and, to an extent, the Bay flicks. Messy, but some fun moments and concepts.)Prowl4 wrote:No flaw to it it's pure fact. Obviously you like the characters and the agenda of idw. You must hate g1 and the bayverse lol.
Seriously, "homosexual agenda"? Acknowledging that gay romance exists is an agenda? The only agenda here is your belief that this should be censored.Prowl4 wrote:Homosexual agenda transformers are disturbing and have no place in these comics. Don't need a reason to not like something. If I don't like it I don't like it.
---
Note how I didn't have anything to say about your thoughts on using Sideways+Armada instead of Tarantulas+Beasts - that's a fair comment on how SotW could be more thoroughly tied into the upcoming Titans Return narrative! (Personally, I like how this is more of an optional side story, but that's just a normal difference in taste.)
I comment and counter to those things I consider screwy, and if 75% of those things are coming from one person, then that person will receive more comment.
Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
Freedom of speech to be disturbed by what I wish.
Poor precious crumpet.
This is currently Seibertron.com's main page banner:
Name calling from a news admin how classy of you. Enforce your own rules.u
Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
Freedom of speech to be disturbed by what I wish.
Poor precious crumpet.
This is currently Seibertron.com's main page banner:
Name calling from a news admin how classy of you. Enforce your own rules.u
I find crumpets delicious actually, and in Yorkshire (where my family is from) they're a term of endearment for any gender.
Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
Freedom of speech to be disturbed by what I wish.
Poor precious crumpet.
This is currently Seibertron.com's main page banner:
Name calling from a news admin how classy of you. Enforce your own rules.u
I find crumpets delicious actually, and in Yorkshire (where my family is from) they're a term of endearment for any gender.
We both know you meant it as an insult, at the very least have the courage to admit it.
Prowl4 wrote:Glad to have a fan.
Prowl4 wrote:We both know you meant it as an insult, at the very least have the courage to admit it.
Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Prowl4 wrote:Dr Va'al wrote:Not like: one thing.
Calling it 'disturbing' is another altogether, as you have been told a number of times now.
(Also, how dare they be at least one female character in each book, it's unnatural, nothing like the real world, where it's almost a half split. Unnatural I tell you. Blasphemy even.)
Freedom of speech to be disturbed by what I wish.
Poor precious crumpet.
This is currently Seibertron.com's main page banner:
Name calling from a news admin how classy of you. Enforce your own rules.u
I find crumpets delicious actually, and in Yorkshire (where my family is from) they're a term of endearment for any gender.
- This is an opinion, no one needs to prove otherwise.Prowl4 wrote:Roberts use of homosexuality between transformers is disturbing, prove it otherwise.
- Again, your opinion, there's no need to have an attitude about it.Prowl4 wrote:Homosexual transformers are disturbing, what of it?
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Blastback, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], kuhlio, Lunatyk, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, sprockitz, Yahoo [Bot]