Koloth wrote:briggs wrote:Starscreams bad comedy wrote:Ya, its just too bad he dont know how to make an actual Transformers movie. One that actually gives something more beyond that of the flashy cg effects and spends some time with the actual subject matter.
This is all gibber jabber, give examples of what you mean, and examples as to why this is not a Transformers movie. Keep in mind, you better have brilliant points, or I'll rip your reply to shreds.
He does have some what of a point. We all know the primary focus of the movie was more on the humans than the Autobots. It was also very much an action movie with very little character developement. In 2.5hours you barely got to know the characters at all. Unless you are a long time fan I could see people having very little feeling for the death of Jazz. As such while poorly worded his argument is fair.
Heck even me a long time fan and one that gives Jazz some preferencial treatment didn't have much feeling for his death. Prime summed it up pretty well with his rather cold "Aw, poor Jazz." Really what are we supposed to be feeling for a character with less than 10 minutes screen time and about 4-5 lines of dialogue.
The movie was far from perfect. To even suggest it was perfect is simply ignoring the truth. Was it fun to watch? Heck yea.
Seibertron wrote:Enjoy the movie for what it is. Life is a lot more fun if you learn to accept the things that you can't change.
ZeroZero wrote:Man, if you hate Michael Bay so much, then why did you watch it?
Koloth wrote:briggs wrote:Starscreams bad comedy wrote:Ya, its just too bad he dont know how to make an actual Transformers movie. One that actually gives something more beyond that of the flashy cg effects and spends some time with the actual subject matter.
This is all gibber jabber, give examples of what you mean, and examples as to why this is not a Transformers movie. Keep in mind, you better have brilliant points, or I'll rip your reply to shreds.
He does have some what of a point. We all know the primary focus of the movie was more on the humans than the Autobots. It was also very much an action movie with very little character developement. In 2.5hours you barely got to know the characters at all. Unless you are a long time fan I could see people having very little feeling for the death of Jazz. As such while poorly worded his argument is fair.
Heck even me a long time fan and one that gives Jazz some preferencial treatment didn't have much feeling for his death. Prime summed it up pretty well with his rather cold "Aw, poor Jazz." Really what are we supposed to be feeling for a character with less than 10 minutes screen time and about 4-5 lines of dialogue.
The movie was far from perfect. To even suggest it was perfect is simply ignoring the truth. Was it fun to watch? Heck yea.
Jazz-935 wrote:So, i dunno man... people DO feel for Jazz, just not the way they did for bumblebee, i think thats obvious why, Bumblebee got to show emotions for his pains, almost looked like her was crying... unlike jazz, who ended up dead doing the heroic thing to do.
Conceptron wrote:I watched the movie because im a TF fan and because I thought that maybe Bay may actually be able to make somewhat of a decent film...that it could be fourth or fifth time lucky. I really didn't think he would subject me to his cheesy slo-mo shots and his ANNOYING editing and quick cuts to ensure that you can't follow the story.
BAY OUT, SPIELBERG IN
I really hope Spielberg can save this franchise before it goes down the tubes. Forget money, let's talk quality!
briggs wrote:This was a 2.5 hour movie with a budget and a new era of expensive CGI, not a movie with a pre-2 year primer of tv series'
Conceptron wrote:Guys, the fact that you can even BEGIN to defend this movie is very scary. Just look at what PROFESSIONAL CRITICS have said AGAINST this movie. They raise sensible points that you should take note of. A dumb, loud movie= rubbish. No two ways about it.
Conceptron wrote:Guys, I am not trying to force an opinion on anybody, but when guys start talking about how great Bayformers was...I just have to bite back.
Koloth wrote:briggs wrote:This was a 2.5 hour movie with a budget and a new era of expensive CGI, not a movie with a pre-2 year primer of tv series'
Don't get me wrong I'm not saying the character developement could have been any better than it was. But they could have made you feel more for the character. And the backstory could have been developed a little better. Ultimately I enjoyed the movie for what it is. But there are things that could have been done much better. And to ignore them isn't any better than to expect everyone to agree that the whole movie was garbage.
Conceptron wrote:I really hope Spielberg can save this franchise before it goes down the tubes. Forget money, let's talk quality!
Conceptron wrote:A bad film is a bad film. People can just say success is solely based on money made which I cannot agree on. But this Bayformers will not be remembered in the same way that T2 was remembered. Why? Because Bay is a rubbish director and should not be allowed to make anymore movies. He will run Transformers to the ground and make the sequels worse and worse.
briggs wrote:Some people just liek to come on here and say the movie sucks and continuously insult you for like it, and trying to change your mind. Unnecessary. And in some cases, try to insinuate that their opinions are indeed facts, even when proved wrong.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Bumblevivisector, Cheetron, Emerje, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Howya84, MSN [Bot], Omegatron., Psycho Warrior, Yahoo [Bot]